{
  "article_index": "P-18-N01",
  "catalog_id": "P-18-N01",
  "claims": [
    {
      "article_sections": [
        "I. What exactly needs preserving",
        "II. A group changes its meeting format",
        "VI. A change is considered through what it does"
      ],
      "attribution": "Editorial distinction; Dewey VI.3 on reconstruction of experience is used within its educational limits.",
      "id": "C01",
      "source_ids": [
        "B31-P-18-N01-S2"
      ],
      "text": "A familiar method and the purpose of an undertaking are not the same condition of preservation.",
      "type": "editorial interpretation"
    },
    {
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Experience is passed on with reasons",
        "V. Understanding is not a test of loyalty"
      ],
      "attribution": "Original example; Dewey I.2 on communication and shared understanding, without a loyalty test.",
      "id": "C02",
      "source_ids": [
        "B31-P-18-N01-S2"
      ],
      "text": "A successor asking for reasons does not establish disloyalty to an undertaking.",
      "type": "editorial interpretation"
    },
    {
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. Accepted promises differ from personal expectations",
        "What this means in practice"
      ],
      "attribution": "Editorial boundary concerning consent; no legal conclusion about a particular commitment.",
      "id": "C03",
      "source_ids": [
        "B31-P-18-N01-S2"
      ],
      "text": "A former leader’s personal expectation does not automatically become another person’s accepted promise.",
      "type": "editorial interpretation"
    },
    {
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. One undertaking can contain different contributions",
        "X. Continuation promises no complete immutability"
      ],
      "attribution": "Bounded comparison of Laozi 2.4 in Legge and 1 Corinthians 3:5–9 KJV, retaining the distinction between Tao and God.",
      "id": "C04",
      "source_ids": [
        "B31-P-18-N01-S1",
        "B31-P-18-N01-S3"
      ],
      "text": "Distinct contributions do not entitle one participant to claim the entire result.",
      "type": "editorial interpretation"
    }
  ],
  "description": "Passing on an undertaking with an understood purpose and actual conditions while allowing successors to change how they participate.",
  "headline": "Passing on an undertaking without demanding complete immutability",
  "language": "en",
  "master_sha256": "62bbb55542b08309472dcd07be3cc023a65752d93018dafb3857325315bc11f4",
  "questions": [
    {
      "a": "Not automatically. What changes, why, and its effects on those concerned matter; novelty and immutability provide no assessment by themselves.",
      "article_sections": [
        "II. A group changes its meeting format",
        "VI. A change is considered through what it does"
      ],
      "q": "Does a new method establish betrayal?",
      "source_ids": [
        "B31-P-18-N01-S2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "a": "There is no universal requirement. Available help, decision-making authority, and limits of further involvement can be discussed separately without preserving concealed leadership.",
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. Helping need not mean remaining in charge",
        "IX. Departure can include a sense of incompleteness"
      ],
      "q": "Must a former participant disappear entirely after handover?",
      "source_ids": [
        "B31-P-18-N01-S1",
        "B31-P-18-N01-S2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "a": "No. What was actually accepted, by whom, and under what conditions needs to be established first. The article determines no legal outcome for a particular case.",
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. Accepted promises differ from personal expectations",
        "What this means in practice"
      ],
      "q": "Does independence remove previous promises?",
      "source_ids": [
        "B31-P-18-N01-S2",
        "B31-P-18-N01-S3"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "retrieval_limits": "Editorial examination of handing over a particular undertaking through a fictional example. No guarantee of successful continuation, calm, or improvement through change; no legal, financial, or clinical instructions. Independence removes no accepted conditions, authorship, or consequences. Tao, God, and secular education form no common doctrine.",
  "revision": 1,
  "schema_version": "uw.editorial_geo.v1",
  "short_answer": "Handover distinguishes purpose, method, an accepted commitment, and a personal wish. Successors may understand and change a form, but changes require discussion of reasons, affected people, and consequences; they do not erase authorship or actual promises.",
  "sources": [
    {
      "author": "Lao-tse / Laozi attribution",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-11",
      "edition": "Tao Teh King translated by James Legge, Project Gutenberg ebook216; actual title/translator lines25–33",
      "id": "B31-P-18-N01-S1",
      "limitations": "Ancient Daoist text in translator's interpretive rendering, not contemporary efficacy evidence or instruction for hidden control. Political hierarchy, knowledge-denial in nearby3 and universal nonaction not adopted. Tao is not identified with biblicalGod or secular social mechanism.",
      "locator": "Chapter 17 paragraphs 1–2; Chapter 2 paragraphs 1–4, Legge divisions; epigraph 17.2",
      "provenance": "Actual selected reading before original draft, precisely recorded in SOURCE_CONCEPT_GATE.json; Dewey I.2 genuinely reused from P40 same continuous task, no fresh whole-work claim.",
      "raw_source_import_allowed": false,
      "raw_source_vectorization_allowed": false,
      "read_scope": "Complete chapter17 paragraphs1–2 lines130–131, complete chapter2 paragraphs1–4 lines56–62 with prose/verse. Nearby chapters3/16/18/19 displayed as context, not contemporary governance endorsement. Header/translator actually read.",
      "rights_note": "Short exact attributed fragments only; no global licence or raw-ingestion permission inferred.",
      "rights_status": "Historical text in specified edition; jurisdiction-specific rights retained",
      "source_type": "primary philosophical work in historical English translation",
      "title": "Tao Teh King, Chapters 17 and 2",
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/files/216/216-h/216-h.htm",
      "year": "Historical translation by James Legge; digital dates not treated as translation publication dates"
    },
    {
      "author": "John Dewey",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-11",
      "edition": "Democracy and Education, original English, Project Gutenberg ebook852",
      "id": "B31-P-18-N01-S2",
      "limitations": "Philosophical educational argument, no controlledstudy of businesshandover or universal psychological efficacy. Historical developmental/civilizational assumptions not adopted, newness not guaranteedbetter.",
      "locator": "Chapter I.2 Education and Communication; Chapter VI.3 Education as Reconstruction",
      "provenance": "Actual selected reading before original draft, precisely recorded in SOURCE_CONCEPT_GATE.json; Dewey I.2 genuinely reused from P40 same continuous task, no fresh whole-work claim.",
      "raw_source_import_allowed": false,
      "raw_source_vectorization_allowed": false,
      "read_scope": "Complete ChapterVI.3 Education as Reconstruction lines587–605 freshly actually read via find output; ChapterI.2 full142–156 genuinely read earlier in this same continuous task for P40 and reused without new wholework reading claim. ChapterVI summary and surrounding previoussection context displayed, not primary adopted scope.",
      "rights_note": "Short exact attributed fragments only; no global licence or raw-ingestion permission inferred.",
      "rights_status": "Historical text in specified edition; jurisdiction-specific rights retained",
      "source_type": "primary philosophical work in original English",
      "title": "Democracy and Education, I.2 and VI.3",
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/files/852/852-h/852-h.htm",
      "year": "Original English; historical philosophical work"
    },
    {
      "author": "Paul / FirstEpistle to Corinthians",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-11",
      "edition": "King James Version, Bible Gateway",
      "id": "B31-P-18-N01-S3",
      "limitations": "Christian ministry and God-given growth retained, not proof all organizations succeed, not permission to neglect practical duties or replaceGodwithmanagementmodel. No legal/financial advice.",
      "locator": "1 Corinthians 3:5–9; key quotation 3:6",
      "provenance": "Actual selected reading before original draft, precisely recorded in SOURCE_CONCEPT_GATE.json; Dewey I.2 genuinely reused from P40 same continuous task, no fresh whole-work claim.",
      "raw_source_import_allowed": false,
      "raw_source_vectorization_allowed": false,
      "read_scope": "Complete3:5–9 lines49–56 with KJV/version62 and PublicDomain64 labels; Paul's ministers, planting/watering, God's increase, labour/reward and building/husbandry context.",
      "rights_note": "Short exact attributed fragments only; no global licence or raw-ingestion permission inferred.",
      "rights_status": "Historical text in specified edition; jurisdiction-specific rights retained",
      "source_type": "primary religious text in named English translation",
      "title": "First Epistle to the Corinthians 3:5–9",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+3%3A5-9&version=KJV",
      "year": "KJV 1611; composition date not inferred"
    }
  ],
  "inherited_verification": null,
  "master_revision": 1,
  "verification": {
    "author_correspondence": "PASS",
    "independent_review": "NOT_RUN",
    "production_machine_publisher_compatibility": "NOT_RUN",
    "production_acceptance": "NOT_RUN"
  }
}
