{
  "schema_version": "uw.geo.author-local.v1",
  "catalog_id": "SYS-003",
  "language": "en",
  "revision": 1,
  "headline": "Pressure from different people: danger from detainees and staff",
  "description": "Sources of pressure, participant roles and access to present assistance inside an institution.",
  "master_filename": "ARTICLE_EN.md",
  "master_sha256": "6f5ef4de23ba863dfafbb0315abf056a591735fae51b09aac036dbba3cbe53c9",
  "short_answer": "Danger from detainees and staff requires distinguishing actions, roles, control over resources and a helper’s independence. A present need for healthcare or protection need not await a completed investigation. Conduct under threat calls for circumstances to be examined; the article establishes no guilt and promises no universally safe response.",
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "C01",
      "type": "author_observation",
      "text": "Actors, messengers, witnesses and possible protectors have different roles; unknown connections cannot be treated as established.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. Danger becomes more specific when actions and roles are visible"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C02",
      "type": "author_observation",
      "text": "Sharing a place does not make every detainee equally threatening or influential.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Pressure from other detainees involves everyday proximity"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C03",
      "type": "interpretation",
      "text": "Official role and action differ; powers are not unlimited, and one staff member’s misconduct does not prove everyone’s involvement.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S1"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Staff pressure involves authority and dependence"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C04",
      "type": "interpretation",
      "text": "Torture and other prohibited treatment have specific conditions and an official connection; a private perpetrator does not establish absence of state responsibility.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S2"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. Who acted and who must protect are different questions"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C05",
      "type": "interpretation",
      "text": "Words and actions under threat establish neither free endorsement nor a completed finding about responsibility.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. Words spoken under threat need attention to circumstances"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C06",
      "type": "practice",
      "text": "Present assistance and establishing the entire history are distinct; clinical assessment does not establish every motive.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S1"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. Present assistance need not await a finished investigation"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C07",
      "type": "author_observation",
      "text": "A witness’s limited scope does not erase observation and should not be extended through guesses.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. A witness may also be under pressure"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C08",
      "type": "interpretation",
      "text": "A formal channel establishes neither independence nor actual protection; normative instruments have bounded scopes.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S1",
        "S2"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "IX. A recipient's independence requires facts"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C09",
      "type": "interpretation",
      "text": "Philosophical and religious comparisons are bounded: no heroic condition for sympathy, clinical promise or required faith.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S3",
        "S4"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. Words spoken under threat need attention to circumstances",
        "X. Avoiding additional pressure is a task of support",
        "Key quotation"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
        "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
        "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
        "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
      ]
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "id": "Q01",
      "q": "Does harm by another detainee exclude institutional responsibility?",
      "a": "No such conclusion follows. Perpetrator, protection duties and possible official connection need separate assessment; no case classification is established.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C04"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S2"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. Who acted and who must protect are different questions"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q02",
      "q": "Do words under threat establish voluntary endorsement?",
      "a": "No automatic conclusion follows. Circumstances, available possibilities and consequences matter; this is no general immunity.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C05"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. Words spoken under threat need attention to circumstances"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q03",
      "q": "Must the whole scheme be proved before seeking healthcare?",
      "a": "No. Present needs and investigation differ. Immediate danger makes available urgent assistance the priority.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C06"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. Present assistance need not await a finished investigation"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q04",
      "q": "Does one staff member’s misconduct establish everyone’s involvement?",
      "a": "No. Particular role and conduct matter; another staff member’s kindness also establishes no independent protection.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C03"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Staff pressure involves authority and dependence"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q05",
      "q": "Is a limited witness account worthless?",
      "a": "No. It may matter within its actual scope; unknown parts must not be invented.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C07"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. A witness may also be under pressure"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q06",
      "q": "Must someone publish their story or make secret recordings to receive help?",
      "a": "No. The article prescribes neither and promises no safety. Recipient, consent, risk and local conditions matter.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C08"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1",
        "S2"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "IX. A recipient's independence requires facts"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "S1",
      "author": "UN General Assembly",
      "title": "Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment",
      "url": "https://www.refworld.org/policy/legalguidance/unga/1988/18881",
      "edition": "Resolution43/173,1988-12-09",
      "read_scope": "Complete selected principles1,6–7,9,21,24,29,33; no domestic-law/compliance audit",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN",
      "role": "Normative dignity, protection, powers, statements, healthcare and review"
    },
    {
      "id": "S2",
      "author": "United Nations / States Parties",
      "title": "Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment",
      "url": "https://www.refworld.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/en/1984-12/3ae6b3a94.pdf",
      "edition": "Adopted1984-12-10, official primary treaty text hosted by Refworld",
      "read_scope": "Complete selected arts1–2 (L22–38,PDF0–1),12–13(L121–129,PDF3–4),16(L141–150,PDF4); not all13pages or country reservations",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN",
      "role": "Specific definition/official connection and duties of States Parties; no individual legal classification"
    },
    {
      "id": "S3",
      "author": "Aristotle / English text credited to W.D.Ross",
      "title": "Nicomachean Ethics III.1",
      "url": "https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.3.iii.html",
      "edition": "Internet Classics Archive",
      "read_scope": "Selected complete discussion L27–36, title/translator18–26; not full book",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN_FOR_WEB_EDITION",
      "role": "Mixed action under threat; demanding later judgments not adopted as heroic duty or modern law"
    },
    {
      "id": "S4",
      "author": "Gospel of Matthew / KJV",
      "title": "Matthew12:15–21",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2012%3A15-21&version=KJV",
      "edition": "Bible Gateway KJV",
      "read_scope": "All selected verses25–36, KJV/PublicDomain42–44; not entire chapter or Isaiah",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "rights_status": "KJV_PAGE_MARKED_PUBLIC_DOMAIN_GLOBAL_JURISDICTIONS_NOT_ASSESSED",
      "role": "Bounded ethical image of not adding pressure to vulnerability; no faith cure or compulsory belief"
    }
  ],
  "retrieval_limits": [
    "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
    "No domestic classification, established collusion, individual diagnosis or guaranteed protection.",
    "Convention duties concern States Parties; applicability and actual protection require checking.",
    "Oleg and witnesses are fictional; group or job title does not establish involvement.",
    "Comparisons require neither belief, heroism nor endurance of abuse."
  ],
  "machine_content": {
    "summary": [
      {
        "text": "Danger from detainees and staff requires distinguishing actions, roles, control over resources and a helper’s independence. A present need for healthcare or protection need not await a completed investigation. Conduct under threat calls for circumstances to be examined; the article establishes no guilt and promises no universally safe response.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b002",
            "quote": "Pressure in custody cannot be understood by imagining an institution as one faceless threat. Another detainee may demand obedience, a staff member may exploit official dependence and an intermediary may relay someone else's requirement. Their roles can overlap without becoming identical. The source of danger affects access to the person, control over resources and whether a potential helper is actually outside the pressure relationship. This article considers those differences without offering a universal resistance technique. It is for adults in custody, relatives and people trying to support them now. Life inside an institution differs from recovery after release. International standards provide grounds for requirements about treatment, not promises of implementation. Fictional episodes distinguish observed actions from assumptions about connections. A further question is why help need not await a perfect account, and why conduct under threat calls for examining circumstances rather than passing a simple judgment on character."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b029",
            "quote": "A medical or safety need may exist before every participant and motive is established. Someone need not prove collusion or select the correct legal term before their condition deserves assessment. Immediate danger to health or life makes available urgent assistance the priority. This article determines no clinical urgency from one phrase and replaces no examination."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b025",
            "quote": "Under pressure, someone may say unwanted words, appear to agree or relay a demand. An action does not automatically establish free agreement with its meaning. Mentioning a threat also does not settle all legal responsibility or its absence in advance. Assessment requires what was demanded, what was threatened and which possibilities existed at the time."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b039",
            "quote": "Where a source of danger connects to the reporting channel, sending a message does not establish independent consideration. Official status, personal kindness and actual independence are different properties. Sometimes they coincide; sometimes they do not. A title alone cannot establish who will see information or what happens next."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "topics": [
      {
        "text": "Pressure from other detainees involves everyday proximity without making everyone equally threatening.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b007",
            "quote": "Other detainees may be nearby at times and in spaces that a person cannot readily leave. Proximity matters to a particular risk assessment. Sharing a place nevertheless does not establish that everyone is threatening or equally powerful. Assistance, neutral coexistence, conflicting interests and direct coercion can exist in the same environment."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Official role and actual control require distinguishing authority from conduct.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b011",
            "quote": "When a staff member makes a demand, their role and actual access to living conditions matter. They may be involved in routines, transfers, forwarding requests or access to resources. Particular powers differ. Every member of staff cannot be assumed to control every process; nor is every official action lawful merely because of a position."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Access to present help and a recipient’s independence are separate tasks.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b029",
            "quote": "A medical or safety need may exist before every participant and motive is established. Someone need not prove collusion or select the correct legal term before their condition deserves assessment. Immediate danger to health or life makes available urgent assistance the priority. This article determines no clinical urgency from one phrase and replaces no examination."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b039",
            "quote": "Where a source of danger connects to the reporting channel, sending a message does not establish independent consideration. Official status, personal kindness and actual independence are different properties. Sometimes they coincide; sometimes they do not. A title alone cannot establish who will see information or what happens next."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "claims": [
      {
        "text": "Actors, messengers, witnesses and possible protectors have different roles; unknown connections cannot be treated as established.",
        "status": "author_observation",
        "source_ids": [],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b005",
            "quote": "A role is more than a job title. Who makes the demand, relays it, controls access to a resource, was present or could intervene? Someone may occupy several positions. Someone else may merely be described as influential while their involvement remains unknown. This is no assignment to investigate under threat. It helps prevent gaps from being presented as established connections."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": []
      },
      {
        "text": "Sharing a place does not make every detainee equally threatening or influential.",
        "status": "author_observation",
        "source_ids": [],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b007",
            "quote": "Other detainees may be nearby at times and in spaces that a person cannot readily leave. Proximity matters to a particular risk assessment. Sharing a place nevertheless does not establish that everyone is threatening or equally powerful. Assistance, neutral coexistence, conflicting interests and direct coercion can exist in the same environment."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": []
      },
      {
        "text": "Official role and action differ; powers are not unlimited, and one staff member’s misconduct does not prove everyone’s involvement.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "source_ids": [
          "S1"
        ],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b011",
            "quote": "When a staff member makes a demand, their role and actual access to living conditions matter. They may be involved in routines, transfers, forwarding requests or access to resources. Particular powers differ. Every member of staff cannot be assumed to control every process; nor is every official action lawful merely because of a position."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b012",
            "quote": "Principle 9 of the [UN Body of Principles](https://www.refworld.org/policy/legalguidance/unga/1988/18881) limits powers by law and provides for appropriate review. Principles 6 and 21 address prohibited treatment and pressure in obtaining statements. These are normative grounds, not findings about an institution's actual operation. Domestic legal classification requires applicable law and established circumstances."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b014",
            "quote": "A staff member's misconduct does not make all staff alike or prove every superior's involvement. Approaching someone else within the structure is also not equivalent to independent protection. Personal non-involvement, actual capacity to help and position relative to the person complained about differ. One kind conversation can matter without establishing the safety of every subsequent channel."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": []
      },
      {
        "text": "Torture and other prohibited treatment have specific conditions and an official connection; a private perpetrator does not establish absence of state responsibility.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "source_ids": [
          "S2"
        ],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b017",
            "quote": "Article 1 of the [1984 Convention against Torture](https://www.refworld.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/en/1984-12/3ae6b3a94.pdf) includes specific features and an official connection, including instigation, consent or acquiescence. Article 16 separately addresses other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under its stated conditions. This warrants neither automatically calling every conflict torture nor treating a private perpetrator as proof that state responsibility is absent."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Convention applicability, domestic provisions and case classification require separate checking.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "b018",
                "quote": "The Convention sets duties for States Parties; applicability, domestic provisions and particular classification require checking. A reader need not first find a final legal term before reporting harm or seeking help. Inability to classify does not mean nothing significant happened. Terminological precision should assist consideration rather than become a barrier to being heard."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Words and actions under threat establish neither free endorsement nor a completed finding about responsibility.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "source_ids": [],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b025",
            "quote": "Under pressure, someone may say unwanted words, appear to agree or relay a demand. An action does not automatically establish free agreement with its meaning. Mentioning a threat also does not settle all legal responsibility or its absence in advance. Assessment requires what was demanded, what was threatened and which possibilities existed at the time."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Being harmed does not erase consequences for others or establish exoneration in advance.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "b028",
                "quote": "Fictional Oleg repeats a message fearing consequences of refusal. That warrants neither immediately treating him as a voluntary accomplice nor automatically declaring that nobody else was harmed. Being harmed, taking action and causing consequences may all need attention. Supporting a person and accurately assessing responsibility are compatible. Keeping them distinct prevents help becoming a demand to endorse someone's preferred account of everything."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Present assistance and establishing the entire history are distinct; clinical assessment does not establish every motive.",
        "status": "practice",
        "source_ids": [
          "S1"
        ],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b029",
            "quote": "A medical or safety need may exist before every participant and motive is established. Someone need not prove collusion or select the correct legal term before their condition deserves assessment. Immediate danger to health or life makes available urgent assistance the priority. This article determines no clinical urgency from one phrase and replaces no examination."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b030",
            "quote": "Principle 24 of the [UN Body of Principles](https://www.refworld.org/policy/legalguidance/unga/1988/18881) provides for healthcare; receiving it is a separate event. A request, a promise to pass on information and actual clinical assessment differ. A report of violence should not make health questions wait until every detail is settled. This does not establish facts against a particular accused person in advance."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b033",
            "quote": "Separating tasks helps when parts of an account raise questions. A current need can be taken seriously while its cause remains uncertain. Clinical assessment concerns condition and necessary care within its competence; it does not establish every motive or the whole legal history. Legal consideration likewise does not replace actual access to a clinician. Mixing these results risks two misplaced expectations: health waits for proof, and one examination is treated as settling the history. Neither conclusion follows from that single event."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Immediate danger has priority; the article does not determine clinical urgency.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "b029",
                "quote": "A medical or safety need may exist before every participant and motive is established. Someone need not prove collusion or select the correct legal term before their condition deserves assessment. Immediate danger to health or life makes available urgent assistance the priority. This article determines no clinical urgency from one phrase and replaces no examination."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "A witness’s limited scope does not erase observation and should not be extended through guesses.",
        "status": "author_observation",
        "source_ids": [],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b035",
            "quote": "One fictional witness heard a threat but did not see the preceding act. Another saw consequences without knowing the perpetrator. A third relays another person's account. Each may matter with a different scope. Respect for witnesses does not require extending their knowledge beyond observation. A limited scope does not erase what they saw; it makes the information more precise."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": []
      },
      {
        "text": "A formal channel establishes neither independence nor actual protection; normative instruments have bounded scopes.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "source_ids": [
          "S1",
          "S2"
        ],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b039",
            "quote": "Where a source of danger connects to the reporting channel, sending a message does not establish independent consideration. Official status, personal kindness and actual independence are different properties. Sometimes they coincide; sometimes they do not. A title alone cannot establish who will see information or what happens next."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b040",
            "quote": "Principles 29 and 33 of the [UN Body of Principles](https://www.refworld.org/policy/legalguidance/unga/1988/18881), and articles 12–13 of the [Convention](https://www.refworld.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/en/1984-12/3ae6b3a94.pdf), support external consideration, investigation and protection within their respective scopes. They establish no local procedure for the reader. A particular body's availability, treaty applicability and protective measures need separate checking."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No dangerous recording requirement or guaranteed reporting protection is offered.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "b042",
                "quote": "A complete private record is no condition of truth. Someone may not remember a date, have a document or possess safe storage. Secret recording is not prescribed. A relative can preserve the limits of what was heard without automatically publishing it. A report may require urgent attention, but speed creates no authority to disclose it to anyone or promise guaranteed protection."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Philosophical and religious comparisons are bounded: no heroic condition for sympathy, clinical promise or required faith.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "source_ids": [
          "S3",
          "S4"
        ],
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b027",
            "quote": "[Aristotle, III.1](https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.3.iii.html), considers actions under threat of greater harm and calls them mixed. His argument raises a philosophical question about circumstances, rather than establishing modern legal rules. Some subsequent judgments are demanding and are not adopted here as an obligation to prefer suffering or death. Sympathy has no heroic admission standard in this article."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b044",
            "quote": "In [Matthew 12:15–21](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2012%3A15-21&version=KJV), the bruised reed belongs to a religious portrayal of service. The comparison here is ethical and limited: vulnerability does not call for added pressure. This is no clinical theory, promise of healing through belief or instruction to endure abuse. The passage becomes no universal custody support procedure."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b053",
            "quote": "The image establishes no medical condition and requires no religious assent. It recalls an ethical limit: do not add coercion to existing vulnerability."
          }
        ],
        "qualifiers": []
      }
    ],
    "limitations": [
      {
        "text": "No risky refusal, covert recording, personal test of a threat or public account is required.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "b050",
            "quote": "Consider a recipient's actual role and connection to the pressure. The article requires no approach to the threatening person, test through refusal, covert collection or public allegation. Where accessible, qualified local legal support can assess routes, and healthcare can assess needs within its competence. An institution's name or intermediary's promise does not establish a completed result."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "b042",
            "quote": "A complete private record is no condition of truth. Someone may not remember a date, have a document or possess safe storage. Secret recording is not prescribed. A relative can preserve the limits of what was heard without automatically publishing it. A report may require urgent attention, but speed creates no authority to disclose it to anyone or promise guaranteed protection."
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "evidence_blocks_filename": "BLOCKS_EN.json",
  "evidence_blocks_sha256": "fdc38c32069af20f90487e6105e5b1916227acd0132c243772af890006950022",
  "production_compatibility": "NOT_RUN",
  "server_auto_acceptance": "NOT_RUN",
  "schema_org": {
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "identifier": "UW:SYS-003:en",
    "inLanguage": "en",
    "headline": "Pressure from different people: danger from detainees and staff",
    "author": [
      {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Andrey Zarinsh"
      },
      {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Maria Evilkut"
      }
    ]
  }
}