# When you are asked to participate in prohibited treatment

Your act has content and grounds. Refusal, stopped harm and a legal outcome differ. The article retains dignity and bounded support without a universally safe route.

For adults in law enforcement or a closed profession, and relatives offering agreed, bounded help.

- What exactly am I being asked to do?
- Why does nonparticipation not yet mean stopped harm?
- How does an independent role differ from an outside label?
- Why does required protection not prove protection delivered?
- How can adult voice and helper limits remain?

Sergey is fictional. No ready classification, immunity, departure permission or required risky confrontation is supplied. Immediate danger needs appropriate local urgent help without a perfect legal account first; this creates no new powers. Historical/religious images require neither martyrdom nor shared belief.

## Service passport

catalog_id: SYS-015
language: en
revision: 1
article_file: ARTICLE_EN.md
article_sha256: 94c1a405921140eb7fdfa1e40c6ee252436a54cabfc132241309302f0d693b54