{
  "package_schema": "uw-local-author-geo/1",
  "catalog_id": "SYS-113",
  "route_id": "SYS-113",
  "material_id": "UW:SYS-113:en",
  "language": "en",
  "revision": 1,
  "article_file": "ARTICLE_EN.md",
  "article_sha256": "d32d417996a014b6879b39e7bf4358fbba2337c6ffe90a2c3709ad94ab252a9d",
  "title": "When several parts of local life depend on one organisation",
  "short_answer": "Dependence on one organisation can combine different relationships: work, housing, transport and family activities. Conditions and authority need distinguishing; real benefit does not justify every decision in advance. Change requires resources and participation by those affected. An answer, a review promise and a changed service are different outcomes; a small clarification is not complete departure.",
  "short_answer_evidence": [
    {
      "block_id": "s1.p1",
      "quote": "In a fictional town, Daria works at an enterprise, lives in employment-related housing and uses transport provided for employees. Her child attends a local activity supported by the same organisation. This is an invented scene, not information about a real employer. Start with the separate connections. Income, housing, transport and the child's activity meet different needs, even when a familiar business name appears in all four. The repeated name does not itself explain each relationship's conditions."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s3.p2",
      "quote": "Daria's supervisor also participates in the building council. A work instruction does not automatically become a housing decision, while a household request creates no production duty by itself. Actual powers need identifying in each domain. A job title may be insufficient. “I will arrange everything” can express willingness without establishing an available decision. Good intention replaces neither another participant's authority nor confirmation of a next action. Help may be useful within that limit rather than being considered either comprehensive or worthless."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s2.p1",
      "quote": "An organisation may genuinely provide work, maintain buildings and support local life. In the fictional town, many remember assistance and the work that produced useful things. Their memories need not be dismissed because a present decision raises questions. What was done can be acknowledged without becoming advance justification for every future action. Past assistance and a current condition have different subjects. Recognition of a benefit need not settle the appropriate scope of every later request made in its name."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s8.p1",
      "quote": "A job advertisement elsewhere is not an available transition. Travel, housing, a changed schedule and time between incomes may be needed. This is neither a financial assessment of an actual offer nor advice to resign. The fictional case makes relevant conditions visible. Higher advertised pay does not establish overall feasibility, while a difficult initial assessment does not prove every outside offer impossible. The transition needs its own information. A named option must still connect to the person's situation rather than being treated as a completed route."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s8.p2",
      "quote": "Daria can inquire without giving a prospective employer the entire local dispute. She also should not misrepresent when she can start. A preliminary question is not a signed contract or housing obtained. Another person's contribution cannot be assumed without agreement. Keep clear what is confirmed, what is offered and what remains unarranged. A possible route is not silently financed by someone else's time and promises. Accuracy about a limit need not prevent inquiry; it helps define what the inquiry has actually established so far."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s5.p1",
      "quote": "For one person the town primarily means work; for another, relatives and familiar routes; for a child, activities and friends. These connections need not have equal importance. One member's job change can affect others without making them obstacles to freedom. Shared life also does not give one family role unlimited authority to decide acceptable conditions for everyone. Different subjects need discussion. Dependence on a place can be shared while each participant's relationship with it remains particular, rather than identical by assumption."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s7.p4",
      "quote": "An answer, a promise of review and a changed service are different outcomes. Even a friendly conversation does not automatically produce the last. An unpleasant answer does not prove every future question pointless. Limited evidence of the present result can be retained without making it a verdict on the whole organisation. This scale recognises particular work and particular failure, instead of forcing a dependent participant to choose between total approval and severing every connection with the town. A bounded question can remain bounded even when the larger relationship matters greatly."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s9.p1",
      "quote": "Not every action must be complete departure. A fictional resident may clarify one housing condition, identify an available information route or agree specific travel assistance. These are not promised solutions or instructions to bypass conditions. Their value concerns what actually became possible. One transition can reduce part of a dependency while other relationships remain. A modest outcome need not call itself an independent life to have value. Its limit can be recorded alongside the improvement, rather than either erasing the other for a more dramatic account."
    }
  ],
  "machine_content": {
    "summary": [
      {
        "text": "Dependence on one organisation can combine different relationships: work, housing, transport and family activities. Conditions and authority need distinguishing; real benefit does not justify every decision in advance. Change requires resources and participation by those affected. An answer, a review promise and a changed service are different outcomes; a small clarification is not complete departure.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p1",
            "quote": "In a fictional town, Daria works at an enterprise, lives in employment-related housing and uses transport provided for employees. Her child attends a local activity supported by the same organisation. This is an invented scene, not information about a real employer. Start with the separate connections. Income, housing, transport and the child's activity meet different needs, even when a familiar business name appears in all four. The repeated name does not itself explain each relationship's conditions."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p2",
            "quote": "Daria's supervisor also participates in the building council. A work instruction does not automatically become a housing decision, while a household request creates no production duty by itself. Actual powers need identifying in each domain. A job title may be insufficient. “I will arrange everything” can express willingness without establishing an available decision. Good intention replaces neither another participant's authority nor confirmation of a next action. Help may be useful within that limit rather than being considered either comprehensive or worthless."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s2.p1",
            "quote": "An organisation may genuinely provide work, maintain buildings and support local life. In the fictional town, many remember assistance and the work that produced useful things. Their memories need not be dismissed because a present decision raises questions. What was done can be acknowledged without becoming advance justification for every future action. Past assistance and a current condition have different subjects. Recognition of a benefit need not settle the appropriate scope of every later request made in its name."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s8.p1",
            "quote": "A job advertisement elsewhere is not an available transition. Travel, housing, a changed schedule and time between incomes may be needed. This is neither a financial assessment of an actual offer nor advice to resign. The fictional case makes relevant conditions visible. Higher advertised pay does not establish overall feasibility, while a difficult initial assessment does not prove every outside offer impossible. The transition needs its own information. A named option must still connect to the person's situation rather than being treated as a completed route."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s8.p2",
            "quote": "Daria can inquire without giving a prospective employer the entire local dispute. She also should not misrepresent when she can start. A preliminary question is not a signed contract or housing obtained. Another person's contribution cannot be assumed without agreement. Keep clear what is confirmed, what is offered and what remains unarranged. A possible route is not silently financed by someone else's time and promises. Accuracy about a limit need not prevent inquiry; it helps define what the inquiry has actually established so far."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s5.p1",
            "quote": "For one person the town primarily means work; for another, relatives and familiar routes; for a child, activities and friends. These connections need not have equal importance. One member's job change can affect others without making them obstacles to freedom. Shared life also does not give one family role unlimited authority to decide acceptable conditions for everyone. Different subjects need discussion. Dependence on a place can be shared while each participant's relationship with it remains particular, rather than identical by assumption."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s7.p4",
            "quote": "An answer, a promise of review and a changed service are different outcomes. Even a friendly conversation does not automatically produce the last. An unpleasant answer does not prove every future question pointless. Limited evidence of the present result can be retained without making it a verdict on the whole organisation. This scale recognises particular work and particular failure, instead of forcing a dependent participant to choose between total approval and severing every connection with the town. A bounded question can remain bounded even when the larger relationship matters greatly."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s9.p1",
            "quote": "Not every action must be complete departure. A fictional resident may clarify one housing condition, identify an available information route or agree specific travel assistance. These are not promised solutions or instructions to bypass conditions. Their value concerns what actually became possible. One transition can reduce part of a dependency while other relationships remain. A modest outcome need not call itself an independent life to have value. Its limit can be recorded alongside the improvement, rather than either erasing the other for a more dramatic account."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "topics": [
      {
        "text": "Connected local dependencies on one organisation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p1",
            "quote": "In a fictional town, Daria works at an enterprise, lives in employment-related housing and uses transport provided for employees. Her child attends a local activity supported by the same organisation. This is an invented scene, not information about a real employer. Start with the separate connections. Income, housing, transport and the child's activity meet different needs, even when a familiar business name appears in all four. The repeated name does not itself explain each relationship's conditions."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p3",
            "quote": "Losing one resource can also change access to another. Without existing transport, a new job may be less accessible than its address suggested. Lost income affects housing affordability. These are conditional connections, not a claim that every departure triggers the same sequence. Considering only the first contract may nonetheless be insufficient. Someone can be ready to change work without yet being able to arrange the next transition for a home or family. Willingness does not by itself provide that missing resource."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p1",
            "quote": "In a small place, the same people may meet at work, at home, among parents and at a local celebration. Overlap does not itself establish abuse. It may bring help closer. It also complicates the question of a speaker's present role. A neighbour's request, a supervisor's instruction and a condition for using premises can come in one voice while remaining different actions with different grounds. Recognising familiarity does not identify which of those actions is occurring or what decision the speaker can make."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "claims": [
      {
        "text": "A repeated organisational name does not make work, housing, transport and a child’s activity one relationship.",
        "status": "author_observation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p1",
            "quote": "In a fictional town, Daria works at an enterprise, lives in employment-related housing and uses transport provided for employees. Her child attends a local activity supported by the same organisation. This is an invented scene, not information about a real employer. Start with the separate connections. Income, housing, transport and the child's activity meet different needs, even when a familiar business name appears in all four. The repeated name does not itself explain each relationship's conditions."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "The town is fictional, not a real employer or an established official company-town status.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s1.p1",
                "quote": "In a fictional town, Daria works at an enterprise, lives in employment-related housing and uses transport provided for employees. Her child attends a local activity supported by the same organisation. This is an invented scene, not information about a real employer. Start with the separate connections. Income, housing, transport and the child's activity meet different needs, even when a familiar business name appears in all four. The repeated name does not itself explain each relationship's conditions."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "A direct task, support for a project and informal influence do not establish identical powers.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p2",
            "quote": "A connection can be direct or indirect. An organisation may decide a particular work matter, support someone else's project or influence local acquaintances. These are not automatically equivalent powers. Helping to build a playground does not establish every supervisor's authority to decide who may enter it. Conversely, access to a resource may indeed have conditions. They need identifying separately, rather than being inferred from a general impression of the town's principal organisation. Association and authority require a connection of their own."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "A resource can have its own access conditions requiring separate clarification.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s1.p2",
                "quote": "A connection can be direct or indirect. An organisation may decide a particular work matter, support someone else's project or influence local acquaintances. These are not automatically equivalent powers. Helping to build a playground does not establish every supervisor's authority to decide who may enter it. Conversely, access to a resource may indeed have conditions. They need identifying separately, rather than being inferred from a general impression of the town's principal organisation. Association and authority require a connection of their own."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Past assistance can be recognised without justifying every future decision in advance.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s2.p1",
            "quote": "An organisation may genuinely provide work, maintain buildings and support local life. In the fictional town, many remember assistance and the work that produced useful things. Their memories need not be dismissed because a present decision raises questions. What was done can be acknowledged without becoming advance justification for every future action. Past assistance and a current condition have different subjects. Recognition of a benefit need not settle the appropriate scope of every later request made in its name."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "This gives no right to every resource on any terms or promise of a safe public assertion.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s2.p4",
                "quote": "Rejecting an unlimited debt does not entitle someone to every resource on any terms. Services, premises and joint activities can involve limits and costs. Ask whether they are known and relevant to the action discussed. Appropriate conditions can be followed without giving an organisation authority over every friendship, belief and family decision. This ethical boundary offers no promise that it is easy to maintain or that a dependent resident has a safe way to announce it publicly at once. Recognition and available action remain distinct."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Overlapping roles do not automatically turn a work instruction into a housing decision.",
        "status": "author_observation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p1",
            "quote": "In a small place, the same people may meet at work, at home, among parents and at a local celebration. Overlap does not itself establish abuse. It may bring help closer. It also complicates the question of a speaker's present role. A neighbour's request, a supervisor's instruction and a condition for using premises can come in one voice while remaining different actions with different grounds. Recognising familiarity does not identify which of those actions is occurring or what decision the speaker can make."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p2",
            "quote": "Daria's supervisor also participates in the building council. A work instruction does not automatically become a housing decision, while a household request creates no production duty by itself. Actual powers need identifying in each domain. A job title may be insufficient. “I will arrange everything” can express willingness without establishing an available decision. Good intention replaces neither another participant's authority nor confirmation of a next action. Help may be useful within that limit rather than being considered either comprehensive or worthless."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "The fictional example establishes no abuse from role overlap alone.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s1.p1",
                "quote": "In a fictional town, Daria works at an enterprise, lives in employment-related housing and uses transport provided for employees. Her child attends a local activity supported by the same organisation. This is an invented scene, not information about a real employer. Start with the separate connections. Income, housing, transport and the child's activity meet different needs, even when a familiar business name appears in all four. The repeated name does not itself explain each relationship's conditions."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s3.p1",
                "quote": "In a small place, the same people may meet at work, at home, among parents and at a local celebration. Overlap does not itself establish abuse. It may bring help closer. It also complicates the question of a speaker's present role. A neighbour's request, a supervisor's instruction and a condition for using premises can come in one voice while remaining different actions with different grounds. Recognising familiarity does not identify which of those actions is occurring or what decision the speaker can make."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Housing consequences of ending work require their particular documents and conditions.",
        "status": "practice",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s4.p1",
            "quote": "Employment-related accommodation can make ending work relevant to residence. Its consequences cannot be established from one label or another family's experience. Actual documents, country, time and the people affected matter. This article determines no right to remain, eviction or deadline in your case. It avoids treating such consequences as already known and identical in every building. A real connection deserves consideration precisely because a general word cannot establish how that connection operates or what would follow from a particular change."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No actual right to remain, eviction or deadline is determined.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s4.p1",
                "quote": "Employment-related accommodation can make ending work relevant to residence. Its consequences cannot be established from one label or another family's experience. Actual documents, country, time and the people affected matter. This article determines no right to remain, eviction or deadline in your case. It avoids treating such consequences as already known and identical in every building. A real connection deserves consideration precisely because a general word cannot establish how that connection operates or what would follow from a particular change."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "The ILO sheet considers dependence alongside potentially necessary employer housing and points to national rules.",
        "status": "tradition_claim",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s4.p2",
            "quote": "An official ILO Helpdesk housing sheet considers employer dependence alongside circumstances in which such accommodation may be necessary, and points to national rules. This is bounded institutional guidance, not a universal right to remain indefinitely or an obligation to leave immediately. The full Recommendation 115 is not claimed read here: the accessible sheet referencing it is the source used. [ILO, guidance sheet No. 6](https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40ed_emp/%40emp_ent/%40multi/documents/publication/wcms_116344.pdf)."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S3"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "The accessible sheet, not complete R115, is used; no universal permanent tenancy or immediate departure duty.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s4.p2",
                "quote": "An official ILO Helpdesk housing sheet considers employer dependence alongside circumstances in which such accommodation may be necessary, and points to national rules. This is bounded institutional guidance, not a universal right to remain indefinitely or an obligation to leave immediately. The full Recommendation 115 is not claimed read here: the accessible sheet referencing it is the source used. [ILO, guidance sheet No. 6](https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40ed_emp/%40emp_ent/%40multi/documents/publication/wcms_116344.pdf)."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Household attachments can differ and a change affect several participants.",
        "status": "author_observation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s5.p1",
            "quote": "For one person the town primarily means work; for another, relatives and familiar routes; for a child, activities and friends. These connections need not have equal importance. One member's job change can affect others without making them obstacles to freedom. Shared life also does not give one family role unlimited authority to decide acceptable conditions for everyone. Different subjects need discussion. Dependence on a place can be shared while each participant's relationship with it remains particular, rather than identical by assumption."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s5.p2",
            "quote": "Daria may want work elsewhere while someone close wants to remain at home. This is not yet a choice between loyalty to family and loyalty to the organisation. Clarify which actions really require a shared change. Is different transport possible, what time is needed, and what remains unknown? No option is assumed available. These questions avoid asking people to accept an entire life in one indivisible formula when they are considering a particular work transition. A difference in present preferences need not settle every later decision."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "The article decides neither custody nor what a household must choose; no new option is assumed available.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s5.p2",
                "quote": "Daria may want work elsewhere while someone close wants to remain at home. This is not yet a choice between loyalty to family and loyalty to the organisation. Clarify which actions really require a shared change. Is different transport possible, what time is needed, and what remains unknown? No option is assumed available. These questions avoid asking people to accept an entire life in one indivisible formula when they are considering a particular work transition. A difference in present preferences need not settle every later decision."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s5.p3",
                "quote": "Agreement does not require telling a child every adult dispute or making them an intermediary. Activities can matter without becoming leverage against a parent. Actual conditions need careful consideration; this article decides neither custody nor what a family must choose. A participant's need, a practical resource and a final decision remain distinct. Discussion should not quietly assign every consequence to the person who first named the difficulty. Noticing a dependency and causing it are different actions, even when the conversation begins with one person's concern."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Trust in one task is not automatic consent to circulate personal history across every other role.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p1",
            "quote": "A service worker may know a family as a neighbour; a neighbour may know them through work. One familiar context does not make all private information necessary to every other role. A repair, a work schedule and a child's activity can require different information. This is no universal data-law statement. It distinguishes why trust in one task is not automatic consent to circulate a whole history elsewhere. The same people can participate without every conversation acquiring the same purpose or permissible scope."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p2",
            "quote": "Daria can tell a supervisor her availability without authorising a family explanation at a parents' meeting. A message's content does not settle all later uses. Where information is necessary, recipient and scope can be considered separately. Complete secrecy is not guaranteed even in a friendly local setting. Nor must everything be withheld where accurate information is material. Limited transmission should not become deception, and neighbourly familiarity should not become unrestricted access. Relevant conditions still matter when the parties know each other well."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Neither a universal data-law conclusion nor a guarantee of complete secrecy.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s6.p1",
                "quote": "A service worker may know a family as a neighbour; a neighbour may know them through work. One familiar context does not make all private information necessary to every other role. A repair, a work schedule and a child's activity can require different information. This is no universal data-law statement. It distinguishes why trust in one task is not automatic consent to circulate a whole history elsewhere. The same people can participate without every conversation acquiring the same purpose or permissible scope."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s6.p2",
                "quote": "Daria can tell a supervisor her availability without authorising a family explanation at a parents' meeting. A message's content does not settle all later uses. Where information is necessary, recipient and scope can be considered separately. Complete secrecy is not guaranteed even in a friendly local setting. Nor must everything be withheld where accurate information is material. Limited transmission should not become deception, and neighbourly familiarity should not become unrestricted access. Relevant conditions still matter when the parties know each other well."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Another job advertisement does not arrange the transitions or other people’s resources.",
        "status": "practice",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s8.p1",
            "quote": "A job advertisement elsewhere is not an available transition. Travel, housing, a changed schedule and time between incomes may be needed. This is neither a financial assessment of an actual offer nor advice to resign. The fictional case makes relevant conditions visible. Higher advertised pay does not establish overall feasibility, while a difficult initial assessment does not prove every outside offer impossible. The transition needs its own information. A named option must still connect to the person's situation rather than being treated as a completed route."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s8.p2",
            "quote": "Daria can inquire without giving a prospective employer the entire local dispute. She also should not misrepresent when she can start. A preliminary question is not a signed contract or housing obtained. Another person's contribution cannot be assumed without agreement. Keep clear what is confirmed, what is offered and what remains unarranged. A possible route is not silently financed by someone else's time and promises. Accuracy about a limit need not prevent inquiry; it helps define what the inquiry has actually established so far."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No financial assessment, resignation advice or vacancy guarantee.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s8.p1",
                "quote": "A job advertisement elsewhere is not an available transition. Travel, housing, a changed schedule and time between incomes may be needed. This is neither a financial assessment of an actual offer nor advice to resign. The fictional case makes relevant conditions visible. Higher advertised pay does not establish overall feasibility, while a difficult initial assessment does not prove every outside offer impossible. The transition needs its own information. A named option must still connect to the person's situation rather than being treated as a completed route."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s8.p4",
                "quote": "Sometimes no outside route is found now. That differs from proof that none can ever exist. A question can remain open, or a current search be limited, without promising immediate escape. There is no instruction to investigate the market endlessly or guarantee of a suitable vacancy. Local dependence need become neither a destiny deciding every future activity nor something erased by a confident statement about choosing another job. An unknown future can remain unknown while present limits are described with the seriousness they deserve."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "The Confucian ideal, Christian partiality discussion and institutional sheet offer distinct grounds for questions.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s10.p1",
            "quote": "Legge's Analects 13:23 combines affability with absence of flattery in a moral ideal. It prompts a question about whether coexistence requires ingratiation. The ideal measures no present worker's character and guarantees no protection for disagreement. The selected neighbouring sayings do not become company law either. Applying the question to this town is the author's comparison, with the historical setting retained. [13:23, James Legge](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/3330/pg3330-images.html)."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s10.p2",
            "quote": "James 2:1–9 considers different treatment of rich and poor in a Christian assembly, in relation to faith and the sin of partiality. This describes neither every employer nor a fixed character determined by wealth. The question of the place given to someone has a theological basis here. It replaces no housing, work or transport process and imposes no required belief. [James 2:1–9, KJV](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James%202%3A1-9&version=KJV)."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s10.p3",
            "quote": "ILO's sheet concerns worker housing and applicable local rules. It acknowledges both function and dependence, without supplying a decision about Daria's contract. Historical moral characterisation, Christian partiality and institutional guidance do not form one legal programme. They offer different grounds for asking about relationships, a person's place and conditions of use. Their differences remain visible instead of all three being presented as confirmation of one universal answer. A comparison can illuminate an issue without changing what each source actually considers."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S1",
          "S2",
          "S3"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "They form no common legal programme and provide neither an apartment nor a safe exit.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s10.p3",
                "quote": "ILO's sheet concerns worker housing and applicable local rules. It acknowledges both function and dependence, without supplying a decision about Daria's contract. Historical moral characterisation, Christian partiality and institutional guidance do not form one legal programme. They offer different grounds for asking about relationships, a person's place and conditions of use. Their differences remain visible instead of all three being presented as confirmation of one universal answer. A comparison can illuminate an issue without changing what each source actually considers."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s10.p4",
                "quote": "No common spiritual vocabulary is required to describe an unusable bus or an unknown housing condition. Support within a tradition can coexist with accurate information about a current matter. A source need not solve another domain's task. Neither a quotation about affability without flattery nor sound reasoning about impartial treatment provides an apartment or safe exit. They can preserve the question's meaning while its practical conditions still require work. Understanding a boundary can matter without pretending to perform the missing material transition."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "limitations": [
      {
        "text": "No public confrontation, threat to test a boundary or disclosure of others’ data is required; immediate danger needs urgent help.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s7.p3",
            "quote": "Tone and safety cannot be prescribed remotely. No public confrontation, testing a boundary by threats or disclosure of others' data is required. Someone may choose a private approach, suitable assistance or no further inquiry for now. None establishes cowardice or complete freedom. Actual dependencies remain part of the decision. Immediate danger requires suitable local urgent help before an exercise about dialogue. The choice of a smaller action can recognise a limit without pretending that every available path has equal risk or consequence."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Secrecy and retrieval of material already transmitted are not guaranteed; private correspondence collection is not authorised.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p2",
            "quote": "Daria can tell a supervisor her availability without authorising a family explanation at a parents' meeting. A message's content does not settle all later uses. Where information is necessary, recipient and scope can be considered separately. Complete secrecy is not guaranteed even in a friendly local setting. Nor must everything be withheld where accurate information is material. Limited transmission should not become deception, and neighbourly familiarity should not become unrestricted access. Relevant conditions still matter when the parties know each other well."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p4",
            "quote": "Participation need not become a dispute about every acquaintance's reputation. Keep a specific subject: which information is required for this action and who received it in that role? This promises neither retrieval of material already transmitted nor permission to collect private correspondence. It avoids turning the entire neighbourhood into one administration supposedly possessing a single memory, intention and authority over every life decision. A network may connect people while its participants retain different knowledge, purposes and limits. Those differences should not be assumed away."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "A small outcome is not complete departure; no outside route found now does not establish permanent impossibility.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s9.p1",
            "quote": "Not every action must be complete departure. A fictional resident may clarify one housing condition, identify an available information route or agree specific travel assistance. These are not promised solutions or instructions to bypass conditions. Their value concerns what actually became possible. One transition can reduce part of a dependency while other relationships remain. A modest outcome need not call itself an independent life to have value. Its limit can be recorded alongside the improvement, rather than either erasing the other for a more dramatic account."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s8.p4",
            "quote": "Sometimes no outside route is found now. That differs from proof that none can ever exist. A question can remain open, or a current search be limited, without promising immediate escape. There is no instruction to investigate the market endlessly or guarantee of a suitable vacancy. Local dependence need become neither a destiny deciding every future activity nor something erased by a confident statement about choosing another job. An unknown future can remain unknown while present limits are described with the seriousness they deserve."
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "evidence_blocks": [
    {
      "block_id": "s1.p1",
      "section_id": "s1",
      "article_anchor": "#s1",
      "quote": "In a fictional town, Daria works at an enterprise, lives in employment-related housing and uses transport provided for employees. Her child attends a local activity supported by the same organisation. This is an invented scene, not information about a real employer. Start with the separate connections. Income, housing, transport and the child's activity meet different needs, even when a familiar business name appears in all four. The repeated name does not itself explain each relationship's conditions."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s3.p2",
      "section_id": "s3",
      "article_anchor": "#s3",
      "quote": "Daria's supervisor also participates in the building council. A work instruction does not automatically become a housing decision, while a household request creates no production duty by itself. Actual powers need identifying in each domain. A job title may be insufficient. “I will arrange everything” can express willingness without establishing an available decision. Good intention replaces neither another participant's authority nor confirmation of a next action. Help may be useful within that limit rather than being considered either comprehensive or worthless."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s2.p1",
      "section_id": "s2",
      "article_anchor": "#s2",
      "quote": "An organisation may genuinely provide work, maintain buildings and support local life. In the fictional town, many remember assistance and the work that produced useful things. Their memories need not be dismissed because a present decision raises questions. What was done can be acknowledged without becoming advance justification for every future action. Past assistance and a current condition have different subjects. Recognition of a benefit need not settle the appropriate scope of every later request made in its name."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s8.p1",
      "section_id": "s8",
      "article_anchor": "#s8",
      "quote": "A job advertisement elsewhere is not an available transition. Travel, housing, a changed schedule and time between incomes may be needed. This is neither a financial assessment of an actual offer nor advice to resign. The fictional case makes relevant conditions visible. Higher advertised pay does not establish overall feasibility, while a difficult initial assessment does not prove every outside offer impossible. The transition needs its own information. A named option must still connect to the person's situation rather than being treated as a completed route."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s8.p2",
      "section_id": "s8",
      "article_anchor": "#s8",
      "quote": "Daria can inquire without giving a prospective employer the entire local dispute. She also should not misrepresent when she can start. A preliminary question is not a signed contract or housing obtained. Another person's contribution cannot be assumed without agreement. Keep clear what is confirmed, what is offered and what remains unarranged. A possible route is not silently financed by someone else's time and promises. Accuracy about a limit need not prevent inquiry; it helps define what the inquiry has actually established so far."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s5.p1",
      "section_id": "s5",
      "article_anchor": "#s5",
      "quote": "For one person the town primarily means work; for another, relatives and familiar routes; for a child, activities and friends. These connections need not have equal importance. One member's job change can affect others without making them obstacles to freedom. Shared life also does not give one family role unlimited authority to decide acceptable conditions for everyone. Different subjects need discussion. Dependence on a place can be shared while each participant's relationship with it remains particular, rather than identical by assumption."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s7.p4",
      "section_id": "s7",
      "article_anchor": "#s7",
      "quote": "An answer, a promise of review and a changed service are different outcomes. Even a friendly conversation does not automatically produce the last. An unpleasant answer does not prove every future question pointless. Limited evidence of the present result can be retained without making it a verdict on the whole organisation. This scale recognises particular work and particular failure, instead of forcing a dependent participant to choose between total approval and severing every connection with the town. A bounded question can remain bounded even when the larger relationship matters greatly."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s9.p1",
      "section_id": "s9",
      "article_anchor": "#s9",
      "quote": "Not every action must be complete departure. A fictional resident may clarify one housing condition, identify an available information route or agree specific travel assistance. These are not promised solutions or instructions to bypass conditions. Their value concerns what actually became possible. One transition can reduce part of a dependency while other relationships remain. A modest outcome need not call itself an independent life to have value. Its limit can be recorded alongside the improvement, rather than either erasing the other for a more dramatic account."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s1.p3",
      "section_id": "s1",
      "article_anchor": "#s1",
      "quote": "Losing one resource can also change access to another. Without existing transport, a new job may be less accessible than its address suggested. Lost income affects housing affordability. These are conditional connections, not a claim that every departure triggers the same sequence. Considering only the first contract may nonetheless be insufficient. Someone can be ready to change work without yet being able to arrange the next transition for a home or family. Willingness does not by itself provide that missing resource."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s3.p1",
      "section_id": "s3",
      "article_anchor": "#s3",
      "quote": "In a small place, the same people may meet at work, at home, among parents and at a local celebration. Overlap does not itself establish abuse. It may bring help closer. It also complicates the question of a speaker's present role. A neighbour's request, a supervisor's instruction and a condition for using premises can come in one voice while remaining different actions with different grounds. Recognising familiarity does not identify which of those actions is occurring or what decision the speaker can make."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s1.p2",
      "section_id": "s1",
      "article_anchor": "#s1",
      "quote": "A connection can be direct or indirect. An organisation may decide a particular work matter, support someone else's project or influence local acquaintances. These are not automatically equivalent powers. Helping to build a playground does not establish every supervisor's authority to decide who may enter it. Conversely, access to a resource may indeed have conditions. They need identifying separately, rather than being inferred from a general impression of the town's principal organisation. Association and authority require a connection of their own."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s4.p1",
      "section_id": "s4",
      "article_anchor": "#s4",
      "quote": "Employment-related accommodation can make ending work relevant to residence. Its consequences cannot be established from one label or another family's experience. Actual documents, country, time and the people affected matter. This article determines no right to remain, eviction or deadline in your case. It avoids treating such consequences as already known and identical in every building. A real connection deserves consideration precisely because a general word cannot establish how that connection operates or what would follow from a particular change."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s4.p2",
      "section_id": "s4",
      "article_anchor": "#s4",
      "quote": "An official ILO Helpdesk housing sheet considers employer dependence alongside circumstances in which such accommodation may be necessary, and points to national rules. This is bounded institutional guidance, not a universal right to remain indefinitely or an obligation to leave immediately. The full Recommendation 115 is not claimed read here: the accessible sheet referencing it is the source used. [ILO, guidance sheet No. 6](https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40ed_emp/%40emp_ent/%40multi/documents/publication/wcms_116344.pdf)."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s5.p2",
      "section_id": "s5",
      "article_anchor": "#s5",
      "quote": "Daria may want work elsewhere while someone close wants to remain at home. This is not yet a choice between loyalty to family and loyalty to the organisation. Clarify which actions really require a shared change. Is different transport possible, what time is needed, and what remains unknown? No option is assumed available. These questions avoid asking people to accept an entire life in one indivisible formula when they are considering a particular work transition. A difference in present preferences need not settle every later decision."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s6.p1",
      "section_id": "s6",
      "article_anchor": "#s6",
      "quote": "A service worker may know a family as a neighbour; a neighbour may know them through work. One familiar context does not make all private information necessary to every other role. A repair, a work schedule and a child's activity can require different information. This is no universal data-law statement. It distinguishes why trust in one task is not automatic consent to circulate a whole history elsewhere. The same people can participate without every conversation acquiring the same purpose or permissible scope."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s6.p2",
      "section_id": "s6",
      "article_anchor": "#s6",
      "quote": "Daria can tell a supervisor her availability without authorising a family explanation at a parents' meeting. A message's content does not settle all later uses. Where information is necessary, recipient and scope can be considered separately. Complete secrecy is not guaranteed even in a friendly local setting. Nor must everything be withheld where accurate information is material. Limited transmission should not become deception, and neighbourly familiarity should not become unrestricted access. Relevant conditions still matter when the parties know each other well."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s10.p1",
      "section_id": "s10",
      "article_anchor": "#s10",
      "quote": "Legge's Analects 13:23 combines affability with absence of flattery in a moral ideal. It prompts a question about whether coexistence requires ingratiation. The ideal measures no present worker's character and guarantees no protection for disagreement. The selected neighbouring sayings do not become company law either. Applying the question to this town is the author's comparison, with the historical setting retained. [13:23, James Legge](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/3330/pg3330-images.html)."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s10.p2",
      "section_id": "s10",
      "article_anchor": "#s10",
      "quote": "James 2:1–9 considers different treatment of rich and poor in a Christian assembly, in relation to faith and the sin of partiality. This describes neither every employer nor a fixed character determined by wealth. The question of the place given to someone has a theological basis here. It replaces no housing, work or transport process and imposes no required belief. [James 2:1–9, KJV](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James%202%3A1-9&version=KJV)."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s10.p3",
      "section_id": "s10",
      "article_anchor": "#s10",
      "quote": "ILO's sheet concerns worker housing and applicable local rules. It acknowledges both function and dependence, without supplying a decision about Daria's contract. Historical moral characterisation, Christian partiality and institutional guidance do not form one legal programme. They offer different grounds for asking about relationships, a person's place and conditions of use. Their differences remain visible instead of all three being presented as confirmation of one universal answer. A comparison can illuminate an issue without changing what each source actually considers."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s7.p3",
      "section_id": "s7",
      "article_anchor": "#s7",
      "quote": "Tone and safety cannot be prescribed remotely. No public confrontation, testing a boundary by threats or disclosure of others' data is required. Someone may choose a private approach, suitable assistance or no further inquiry for now. None establishes cowardice or complete freedom. Actual dependencies remain part of the decision. Immediate danger requires suitable local urgent help before an exercise about dialogue. The choice of a smaller action can recognise a limit without pretending that every available path has equal risk or consequence."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s6.p4",
      "section_id": "s6",
      "article_anchor": "#s6",
      "quote": "Participation need not become a dispute about every acquaintance's reputation. Keep a specific subject: which information is required for this action and who received it in that role? This promises neither retrieval of material already transmitted nor permission to collect private correspondence. It avoids turning the entire neighbourhood into one administration supposedly possessing a single memory, intention and authority over every life decision. A network may connect people while its participants retain different knowledge, purposes and limits. Those differences should not be assumed away."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s8.p4",
      "section_id": "s8",
      "article_anchor": "#s8",
      "quote": "Sometimes no outside route is found now. That differs from proof that none can ever exist. A question can remain open, or a current search be limited, without promising immediate escape. There is no instruction to investigate the market endlessly or guarantee of a suitable vacancy. Local dependence need become neither a destiny deciding every future activity nor something erased by a confident statement about choosing another job. An unknown future can remain unknown while present limits are described with the seriousness they deserve."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s7.p1",
      "section_id": "s7",
      "article_anchor": "#s7",
      "quote": "If an employee bus no longer runs at a usable time, that is a particular transport question. Daria need not first declare opposition to the enterprise's entire history. Agreement that it matters locally does not explain how to travel tomorrow either. Different levels can become mixed when past achievements replace discussion of the timetable. Return to the subject without dismissing assistance or assuming a route change must be possible. Recognition of what was done and attention to what is needed now can remain compatible."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s4.p3",
      "section_id": "s4",
      "article_anchor": "#s4",
      "quote": "Daria may first need to know which particular relationship connects housing and work. Clarification need not mean resigning immediately or disclosing a whole plan to every acquaintance. The question has a scope. Where actual rights and significant risk are involved, competent local consideration differs from a friend's supposition. An international sheet does not replace it. Suitable help also is not considered already available merely because it would be useful. The need for another kind of assistance and its actual availability are different facts."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s5.p3",
      "section_id": "s5",
      "article_anchor": "#s5",
      "quote": "Agreement does not require telling a child every adult dispute or making them an intermediary. Activities can matter without becoming leverage against a parent. Actual conditions need careful consideration; this article decides neither custody nor what a family must choose. A participant's need, a practical resource and a final decision remain distinct. Discussion should not quietly assign every consequence to the person who first named the difficulty. Noticing a dependency and causing it are different actions, even when the conversation begins with one person's concern."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s9.p4",
      "section_id": "s9",
      "article_anchor": "#s9",
      "quote": "If a small change fails, the question's precision need not become worthless. Precision also must not be represented as improved conditions where none occurred. A result may be information received, a limit established or a next action agreed. These outcomes differ. They prevent unconfirmed promises accumulating or every step being asked to prove victory over territorial dependence. That dependence involves many participants' resources, work and decisions. A limited action can be described honestly without claiming it has resolved the whole arrangement or shown resolution forever impossible."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s2.p4",
      "section_id": "s2",
      "article_anchor": "#s2",
      "quote": "Rejecting an unlimited debt does not entitle someone to every resource on any terms. Services, premises and joint activities can involve limits and costs. Ask whether they are known and relevant to the action discussed. Appropriate conditions can be followed without giving an organisation authority over every friendship, belief and family decision. This ethical boundary offers no promise that it is easy to maintain or that a dependent resident has a safe way to announce it publicly at once. Recognition and available action remain distinct."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s10.p4",
      "section_id": "s10",
      "article_anchor": "#s10",
      "quote": "No common spiritual vocabulary is required to describe an unusable bus or an unknown housing condition. Support within a tradition can coexist with accurate information about a current matter. A source need not solve another domain's task. Neither a quotation about affability without flattery nor sound reasoning about impartial treatment provides an apartment or safe exit. They can preserve the question's meaning while its practical conditions still require work. Understanding a boundary can matter without pretending to perform the missing material transition."
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "q": "Does gratitude require an end to questions?",
      "a": "Past assistance can be recognised separately from a current condition. A timetable question need not become a vote on the entire organisation.",
      "article_sections": [
        "s2",
        "s7"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "s2.p1",
          "quote": "An organisation may genuinely provide work, maintain buildings and support local life. In the fictional town, many remember assistance and the work that produced useful things. Their memories need not be dismissed because a present decision raises questions. What was done can be acknowledged without becoming advance justification for every future action. Past assistance and a current condition have different subjects. Recognition of a benefit need not settle the appropriate scope of every later request made in its name."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s7.p1",
          "quote": "If an employee bus no longer runs at a usable time, that is a particular transport question. Daria need not first declare opposition to the enterprise's entire history. Agreement that it matters locally does not explain how to travel tomorrow either. Different levels can become mixed when past achievements replace discussion of the timetable. Return to the subject without dismissing assistance or assuming a route change must be possible. Recognition of what was done and attention to what is needed now can remain compatible."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Does leaving work automatically settle housing?",
      "a": "Actual documents, country, time and those affected matter. Competent local consideration differs from a friend’s supposition, and its availability is not assumed.",
      "article_sections": [
        "s4"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "s4.p1",
          "quote": "Employment-related accommodation can make ending work relevant to residence. Its consequences cannot be established from one label or another family's experience. Actual documents, country, time and the people affected matter. This article determines no right to remain, eviction or deadline in your case. It avoids treating such consequences as already known and identical in every building. A real connection deserves consideration precisely because a general word cannot establish how that connection operates or what would follow from a particular change."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s4.p3",
          "quote": "Daria may first need to know which particular relationship connects housing and work. Clarification need not mean resigning immediately or disclosing a whole plan to every acquaintance. The question has a scope. Where actual rights and significant risk are involved, competent local consideration differs from a friend's supposition. An international sheet does not replace it. Suitable help also is not considered already available merely because it would be useful. The need for another kind of assistance and its actual availability are different facts."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Is a close person who wants to stay obstructing freedom?",
      "a": "Different attachments can have different significance. A particular change, participants’ needs and a decision can be distinguished without making a child an intermediary or using a single label.",
      "article_sections": [
        "s5"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "s5.p1",
          "quote": "For one person the town primarily means work; for another, relatives and familiar routes; for a child, activities and friends. These connections need not have equal importance. One member's job change can affect others without making them obstacles to freedom. Shared life also does not give one family role unlimited authority to decide acceptable conditions for everyone. Different subjects need discussion. Dependence on a place can be shared while each participant's relationship with it remains particular, rather than identical by assumption."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s5.p2",
          "quote": "Daria may want work elsewhere while someone close wants to remain at home. This is not yet a choice between loyalty to family and loyalty to the organisation. Clarify which actions really require a shared change. Is different transport possible, what time is needed, and what remains unknown? No option is assumed available. These questions avoid asking people to accept an entire life in one indivisible formula when they are considering a particular work transition. A difference in present preferences need not settle every later decision."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s5.p3",
          "quote": "Agreement does not require telling a child every adult dispute or making them an intermediary. Activities can matter without becoming leverage against a parent. Actual conditions need careful consideration; this article decides neither custody nor what a family must choose. A participant's need, a practical resource and a final decision remain distinct. Discussion should not quietly assign every consequence to the person who first named the difficulty. Noticing a dependency and causing it are different actions, even when the conversation begins with one person's concern."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Can a small step matter without complete departure?",
      "a": "A clarified condition or particular assistance can have value. Information, an established limit and an agreed action differ from an improvement that has not happened.",
      "article_sections": [
        "s9"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "s9.p1",
          "quote": "Not every action must be complete departure. A fictional resident may clarify one housing condition, identify an available information route or agree specific travel assistance. These are not promised solutions or instructions to bypass conditions. Their value concerns what actually became possible. One transition can reduce part of a dependency while other relationships remain. A modest outcome need not call itself an independent life to have value. Its limit can be recorded alongside the improvement, rather than either erasing the other for a more dramatic account."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s9.p4",
          "quote": "If a small change fails, the question's precision need not become worthless. Precision also must not be represented as improved conditions where none occurred. A result may be information received, a limit established or a next action agreed. These outcomes differ. They prevent unconfirmed promises accumulating or every step being asked to prove victory over territorial dependence. That dependence involves many participants' resources, work and decisions. A limited action can be described honestly without claiming it has resolved the whole arrangement or shown resolution forever impossible."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "S1",
      "author": "Confucius; translation James Legge",
      "title": "Analects13:23, Project Gutenberg3330",
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/3330/pg3330-images.html",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "read_scope": "Author/translator/digitisation/outside-US notice0–24; complete13:23 at376; adjacent13:24 at377 and13:25 at378–379 read. Other sayings displayed, not adopted; Chinese original/full notes/book not read. Old /files/3330/3330-h address404 excluded.",
      "role": "Four-word affable/not-adulatory fragment as epigraph, own RU/TH translations; limited question of coexistence/flattery in X.",
      "limits": "Historical moral ideal, not present worker diagnosis, safe dissent guarantee, universal company law or silent substitution of another harmony/uniformity translation.",
      "rights_status": "GUTENBERG_OUTSIDE_US_WARNING_RETAINED_SHORT_ATTRIBUTED_USE",
      "rights_notes": "Very short English fragment and own translations, not full book/page/layout or global jurisdiction clearance.",
      "search_executor": "Codex web.run, branch F author"
    },
    {
      "id": "S2",
      "author": "Epistle of James",
      "title": "James2:1–9, King James Version",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James%202%3A1-9&version=KJV",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "read_scope": "All nine selected verses25–39 and KJV/public-domain information45–47 read. Not complete chapter.",
      "role": "Selected question clause2:4 as key; Christian assembly/faith/partiality context in X.",
      "limits": "Not a verdict on every employer or rich/poor person, modern tenancy/labour law, compulsory faith or guaranteed protection.",
      "rights_status": "KJV_PAGE_MARKED_PUBLIC_DOMAIN_GLOBAL_JURISDICTIONS_UNASSESSED",
      "rights_notes": "One short English clause and own RU/TH translations; no full passage reproduction.",
      "search_executor": "Codex web.run, branch F author"
    },
    {
      "id": "S3",
      "author": "ILO Helpdesk, Multinational Enterprises Programme",
      "title": "Guidance sheet No.6 on workers’ housing, undated in verified material",
      "url": "https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40ed_emp/%40emp_ent/%40multi/documents/publication/wcms_116344.pdf",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "read_scope": "Official2pagePDF: first-page introduction/guiding principles0–52; second-page freedoms/visits161–166, vacating after termination174–180, consultation181–186; references187–202 and issuing office202–209. Technical dimensions/whole health section not claimed reviewed or adopted.",
      "role": "Bounded work/housing relation, function/dependence and actual local conditions, IV/X.",
      "limits": "Not full R115 reading: NORMLEX endpoint failed400redirectloop. Guidance references Recommendation115,1961; no date guessed for sheet, local incorporation, grace period, perpetual tenancy, automatic eviction, technical standard or contact-number export.",
      "rights_status": "LIMITED_ATTRIBUTED_PARAPHRASE_NO_FULL_SOURCE_REPUBLICATION",
      "rights_notes": "No direct quotation, diagram/layout or full checklist reproduction; no global licence opinion.",
      "search_executor": "Codex web.run, branch F author"
    }
  ],
  "acceptance": {
    "author_semantic_review": "AUTHOR_REVIEWED_WITH_NOTES",
    "local_inner_schema": "PASS",
    "production_compatibility": "NOT_RUN",
    "independent_review": "NOT_RUN",
    "server_auto_acceptance": "NOT_RUN",
    "import": "NOT_RUN",
    "indexing": "NOT_RUN",
    "human_acceptance": "NOT_RUN",
    "publication": "NOT_RUN"
  }
}