{
  "package_schema": "uw-local-author-geo/1",
  "catalog_id": "SYS-127",
  "route_id": "SYS-127",
  "material_id": "UW:SYS-127:en",
  "language": "en",
  "revision": 1,
  "article_file": "ARTICLE_EN.md",
  "article_sha256": "7c1f052e1a5b7b41cf7635832f1733316ef74a3cdd020a094b1a81c9e2877636",
  "title": "Rest, the body and daily needs on someone else’s timetable",
  "short_answer": "Scheduled breaks differ from usable time after travel and queues. Hunger, thirst, fatigue and toilet needs are not one emotion and receive no medical assessment here. Resource presence, permission, reachability and timing differ. Rest opportunities guarantee neither sleep nor recovery. A controlled institution cannot presume free departure; need requires no dangerous deprivation test. Partial results establish no complete provision. Dignity depends neither on health, endurance nor productivity.",
  "short_answer_evidence": [
    {
      "block_id": "s1.p1",
      "quote": "Imagine Viktor at a work site with a twenty-minute break. Walking to the dining area and back takes eight minutes; queuing takes seven, leaving five for eating. This is fictional arithmetic, not an acceptable standard or advice to eat in five minutes. Following a timetable may still leave an inadequate opportunity. Announced duration, travel and remaining usable time differ; the label “break” makes them neither equal nor sufficient."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s2.p1",
      "quote": "Fatigue, hunger, thirst and needing a toilet are not one emotion met through one response. No particular sensation’s cause or medical severity is assessed here. Someone may name a need without a complete explanation. Asking for water need not become a public endurance test. An appropriate act may nevertheless depend on health, competent assistance and actual conditions rather than a general sentence. Naming the subject is not diagnosing or prescribing its solution."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s3.p1",
      "quote": "Water may be behind a locked door; meals available while a post cannot be left; a rest room occupied by a compulsory meeting. These fictional gaps differ. Resource presence, permission, reachability and usable timing do not coincide. One establishes none of the others. Specific wording can identify what is missing without promising change or making every restriction safe to test. A room’s existence does not say when or how someone can actually use it."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s4.p1",
      "quote": "Suitable time and space permit rest without guaranteeing immediate sleep or recovery. No sleep disorder is assessed or treated here. A break should not become a test requiring correct restoration. Conditions and results differ. Continued fatigue proves neither every pause useless, personal fault nor adequate external provision. Viktor’s actual state cannot be certified from the schedule or from knowing a room was provided. An opportunity can be real while a question about the result remains open."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s6.p1",
      "quote": "Consider another fictional scene. Nikolai is in a controlled institution and cannot independently leave for water or an item. The category or lawfulness of detention is not determined. “Choose another dining area” or “go home” cannot describe this situation. Controlled movement gives needs an institutional dimension. Asking, permission, accompaniment and delivered resources differ. Explaining the proper request establishes no complete access. The person’s dependency should remain visible rather than being treated as solved once the institution has supplied the correct wording to use."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s6.p3",
      "quote": "Nikolai need not prove missing access through deterioration, fasting, refusing water or another dangerous test. No control bypass or covert resource tactics are proposed. Immediate danger needs appropriate urgent assistance under actual conditions; availability is not presumed. Calm creates no object and transfers no institutional responsibility. Dependence may continue after a need is accurately named, without becoming a moral defect requiring greater endurance. No exercise should turn recognising a shortage into a reason to worsen it for more persuasive evidence."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s9.p1",
      "quote": "Part of a need may be met while fatigue remains. This neither erases the opportunity nor establishes everything necessary provided. Water received, eating, usable space and actual recovery differ. They should not merge into “everything is fine now.” No health assessment is made. Missing expected benefit is not ingratitude, and one favourable result certifies no adequate conditions overall. What has improved can retain its scope alongside a need that remains, without requiring either triumph or denial of the specific resource actually delivered."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s9.p4",
      "quote": "Dignity rewards neither health, endurance nor productivity. It remains when someone needs help, cannot recover quickly or cannot safely ask. This value does not promise water or suitable surroundings through respect alone: material needs remain material. Accurate naming matters without being sufficient. Spiritual support, caution and partial results may coexist with actual provision, without one resource replacing all absent others. A person’s worth should remain distinct from the practical question of what conditions and assistance have actually become accessible to them."
    }
  ],
  "machine_content": {
    "summary": [
      {
        "text": "Scheduled breaks differ from usable time after travel and queues. Hunger, thirst, fatigue and toilet needs are not one emotion and receive no medical assessment here. Resource presence, permission, reachability and timing differ. Rest opportunities guarantee neither sleep nor recovery. A controlled institution cannot presume free departure; need requires no dangerous deprivation test. Partial results establish no complete provision. Dignity depends neither on health, endurance nor productivity.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p1",
            "quote": "Imagine Viktor at a work site with a twenty-minute break. Walking to the dining area and back takes eight minutes; queuing takes seven, leaving five for eating. This is fictional arithmetic, not an acceptable standard or advice to eat in five minutes. Following a timetable may still leave an inadequate opportunity. Announced duration, travel and remaining usable time differ; the label “break” makes them neither equal nor sufficient."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s2.p1",
            "quote": "Fatigue, hunger, thirst and needing a toilet are not one emotion met through one response. No particular sensation’s cause or medical severity is assessed here. Someone may name a need without a complete explanation. Asking for water need not become a public endurance test. An appropriate act may nevertheless depend on health, competent assistance and actual conditions rather than a general sentence. Naming the subject is not diagnosing or prescribing its solution."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p1",
            "quote": "Water may be behind a locked door; meals available while a post cannot be left; a rest room occupied by a compulsory meeting. These fictional gaps differ. Resource presence, permission, reachability and usable timing do not coincide. One establishes none of the others. Specific wording can identify what is missing without promising change or making every restriction safe to test. A room’s existence does not say when or how someone can actually use it."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s4.p1",
            "quote": "Suitable time and space permit rest without guaranteeing immediate sleep or recovery. No sleep disorder is assessed or treated here. A break should not become a test requiring correct restoration. Conditions and results differ. Continued fatigue proves neither every pause useless, personal fault nor adequate external provision. Viktor’s actual state cannot be certified from the schedule or from knowing a room was provided. An opportunity can be real while a question about the result remains open."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p1",
            "quote": "Consider another fictional scene. Nikolai is in a controlled institution and cannot independently leave for water or an item. The category or lawfulness of detention is not determined. “Choose another dining area” or “go home” cannot describe this situation. Controlled movement gives needs an institutional dimension. Asking, permission, accompaniment and delivered resources differ. Explaining the proper request establishes no complete access. The person’s dependency should remain visible rather than being treated as solved once the institution has supplied the correct wording to use."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p3",
            "quote": "Nikolai need not prove missing access through deterioration, fasting, refusing water or another dangerous test. No control bypass or covert resource tactics are proposed. Immediate danger needs appropriate urgent assistance under actual conditions; availability is not presumed. Calm creates no object and transfers no institutional responsibility. Dependence may continue after a need is accurately named, without becoming a moral defect requiring greater endurance. No exercise should turn recognising a shortage into a reason to worsen it for more persuasive evidence."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s9.p1",
            "quote": "Part of a need may be met while fatigue remains. This neither erases the opportunity nor establishes everything necessary provided. Water received, eating, usable space and actual recovery differ. They should not merge into “everything is fine now.” No health assessment is made. Missing expected benefit is not ingratitude, and one favourable result certifies no adequate conditions overall. What has improved can retain its scope alongside a need that remains, without requiring either triumph or denial of the specific resource actually delivered."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s9.p4",
            "quote": "Dignity rewards neither health, endurance nor productivity. It remains when someone needs help, cannot recover quickly or cannot safely ask. This value does not promise water or suitable surroundings through respect alone: material needs remain material. Accurate naming matters without being sufficient. Spiritual support, caution and partial results may coexist with actual provision, without one resource replacing all absent others. A person’s worth should remain distinct from the practical question of what conditions and assistance have actually become accessible to them."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "topics": [
      {
        "text": "Rest, bodily and daily needs on another’s timetable, including actual access beyond the working-day boundary",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p1",
            "quote": "Imagine Viktor at a work site with a twenty-minute break. Walking to the dining area and back takes eight minutes; queuing takes seven, leaving five for eating. This is fictional arithmetic, not an acceptable standard or advice to eat in five minutes. Following a timetable may still leave an inadequate opportunity. Announced duration, travel and remaining usable time differ; the label “break” makes them neither equal nor sufficient."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s2.p1",
            "quote": "Fatigue, hunger, thirst and needing a toilet are not one emotion met through one response. No particular sensation’s cause or medical severity is assessed here. Someone may name a need without a complete explanation. Asking for water need not become a public endurance test. An appropriate act may nevertheless depend on health, competent assistance and actual conditions rather than a general sentence. Naming the subject is not diagnosing or prescribing its solution."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p1",
            "quote": "Water may be behind a locked door; meals available while a post cannot be left; a rest room occupied by a compulsory meeting. These fictional gaps differ. Resource presence, permission, reachability and usable timing do not coincide. One establishes none of the others. Specific wording can identify what is missing without promising change or making every restriction safe to test. A room’s existence does not say when or how someone can actually use it."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s4.p2",
            "quote": "External timing may continue off shift through transport, roll calls, shared housing, light and noise. No legal workday boundary is determined; actual days are considered. Formally free time need not mean control of the environment. Permission to lie down does not control lighting or others’ acts. This makes no neighbour automatically at fault. It shows why sleep cannot be described solely as choosing to turn off a phone or taking advice seriously enough."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s5.p1",
            "quote": "Toilets, washing and necessary clean items do not appear through “care for yourself.” An open door, time, water, accompaniment or permission to leave may matter. These examples are no universal institutional checklist. They show the material side of what is called personal responsibility. Where a resource is unavailable, demanding cleanliness does not explain feasibility. No actual sanitation or technical adequacy is certified through this general account; appropriate conditions still need actual provision and, where required, relevant competence."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p1",
            "quote": "Consider another fictional scene. Nikolai is in a controlled institution and cannot independently leave for water or an item. The category or lawfulness of detention is not determined. “Choose another dining area” or “go home” cannot describe this situation. Controlled movement gives needs an institutional dimension. Asking, permission, accompaniment and delivered resources differ. Explaining the proper request establishes no complete access. The person’s dependency should remain visible rather than being treated as solved once the institution has supplied the correct wording to use."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "claims": [
      {
        "text": "Announced breaks, travel, queues and remaining time differ.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p1",
            "quote": "Imagine Viktor at a work site with a twenty-minute break. Walking to the dining area and back takes eight minutes; queuing takes seven, leaving five for eating. This is fictional arithmetic, not an acceptable standard or advice to eat in five minutes. Following a timetable may still leave an inadequate opportunity. Announced duration, travel and remaining usable time differ; the label “break” makes them neither equal nor sufficient."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p3",
            "quote": "A break may include required acts: returning tools, reaching an exit, obtaining permission or changing clothes. This determines no jurisdiction’s working-time rules. The practical question is what remains under someone’s control. Identical timetable numbers can produce different access where one person is nearby and another passes several mandatory stages. Equal minutes alone cannot replace those circumstances. Available time therefore needs description alongside the route and requirements attached to using it."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Twenty minus eight minus seven equals five is fictional arithmetic, no standard or advice to eat in five minutes; no legal working-time calculation is performed.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s1.p1",
                "quote": "Imagine Viktor at a work site with a twenty-minute break. Walking to the dining area and back takes eight minutes; queuing takes seven, leaving five for eating. This is fictional arithmetic, not an acceptable standard or advice to eat in five minutes. Following a timetable may still leave an inadequate opportunity. Announced duration, travel and remaining usable time differ; the label “break” makes them neither equal nor sufficient."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s1.p3",
                "quote": "A break may include required acts: returning tools, reaching an exit, obtaining permission or changing clothes. This determines no jurisdiction’s working-time rules. The practical question is what remains under someone’s control. Identical timetable numbers can produce different access where one person is nearby and another passes several mandatory stages. Equal minutes alone cannot replace those circumstances. Available time therefore needs description alongside the route and requirements attached to using it."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "A specific access gap can be discussed without proving intended deprivation.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s1.p2",
            "quote": "A queue does not establish deliberate deprivation. Organisation, staffing, timing or coordination may be missing. The cause needs consideration, but unproved malice adds no minutes and supplies no meal. A gap between promised opportunity and available action can be discussed without declaring the whole site unsafe or proving someone intended deprivation first. Arrangement and intention need not coincide for an actual shortage to exist and deserve a concrete description."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "A queue establishes neither malice nor the whole site’s danger.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s1.p2",
                "quote": "A queue does not establish deliberate deprivation. Organisation, staffing, timing or coordination may be missing. The cause needs consideration, but unproved malice adds no minutes and supplies no meal. A gap between promised opportunity and available action can be discussed without declaring the whole site unsafe or proving someone intended deprivation first. Arrangement and intention need not coincide for an actual shortage to exist and deserve a concrete description."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Fatigue, hunger, thirst and toilet needs require different accounts.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s2.p1",
            "quote": "Fatigue, hunger, thirst and needing a toilet are not one emotion met through one response. No particular sensation’s cause or medical severity is assessed here. Someone may name a need without a complete explanation. Asking for water need not become a public endurance test. An appropriate act may nevertheless depend on health, competent assistance and actual conditions rather than a general sentence. Naming the subject is not diagnosing or prescribing its solution."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Cause, medical severity and individual solutions are not determined through a general text.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s2.p1",
                "quote": "Fatigue, hunger, thirst and needing a toilet are not one emotion met through one response. No particular sensation’s cause or medical severity is assessed here. Someone may name a need without a complete explanation. Asking for water need not become a public endurance test. An appropriate act may nevertheless depend on health, competent assistance and actual conditions rather than a general sentence. Naming the subject is not diagnosing or prescribing its solution."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Endured inconvenience does not establish disappeared need or adequate access.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s2.p2",
            "quote": "Enduring inconvenience differs from no longer needing a resource. Viktor’s repeated queues establish no adequate access. One difficult day establishes neither overall health nor an entire arrangement’s quality. Retain a specific observation: what was accessible, what failed and what repetition is actually known. No endurance limit should be tested for persuasive evidence, and deterioration should not be awaited before considering need. A concrete shortage can be described without manufacturing a more dramatic demonstration."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Endurance tests or awaited deterioration are unnecessary; one difficult day assesses neither overall health nor the arrangement.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s2.p2",
                "quote": "Enduring inconvenience differs from no longer needing a resource. Viktor’s repeated queues establish no adequate access. One difficult day establishes neither overall health nor an entire arrangement’s quality. Retain a specific observation: what was accessible, what failed and what repetition is actually known. No endurance limit should be tested for persuasive evidence, and deterioration should not be awaited before considering need. A concrete shortage can be described without manufacturing a more dramatic demonstration."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Presence, permission, reachability and suitability are distinct parts of access.",
        "status": "practice",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p1",
            "quote": "Water may be behind a locked door; meals available while a post cannot be left; a rest room occupied by a compulsory meeting. These fictional gaps differ. Resource presence, permission, reachability and usable timing do not coincide. One establishes none of the others. Specific wording can identify what is missing without promising change or making every restriction safe to test. A room’s existence does not say when or how someone can actually use it."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p2",
            "quote": "Physical reachability also varies. Distance, stairs, objects carried and individual limitations change practical possibility. No health or actual accommodation entitlement is determined. Identical instructions establish no identical access. The real route can matter alongside a door on a plan. Assistance is not arranged merely because someone could theoretically provide it or the space is formally for everyone. A possible helper and a person actually able and available to assist are different resources."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s3.p3",
            "quote": "Suitability differs from presence. A rest area may not offer sitting, quiet or its intended function. No universal room standard is prescribed. Ask whether use matches the promise. Opening a room and making it usable during an available interval are separate results. The first need not be dismissed; neither should a sign and unlocked door be reported as fully meeting the need. The actual task still depends on the circumstances in which the room can be used."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No automatically equal access, accommodation entitlement, sanitation certification or universal room standard; possible help is not arranged help.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s3.p2",
                "quote": "Physical reachability also varies. Distance, stairs, objects carried and individual limitations change practical possibility. No health or actual accommodation entitlement is determined. Identical instructions establish no identical access. The real route can matter alongside a door on a plan. Assistance is not arranged merely because someone could theoretically provide it or the space is formally for everyone. A possible helper and a person actually able and available to assist are different resources."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s3.p3",
                "quote": "Suitability differs from presence. A rest area may not offer sitting, quiet or its intended function. No universal room standard is prescribed. Ask whether use matches the promise. Opening a room and making it usable during an available interval are separate results. The first need not be dismissed; neither should a sign and unlocked door be reported as fully meeting the need. The actual task still depends on the circumstances in which the room can be used."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s5.p1",
                "quote": "Toilets, washing and necessary clean items do not appear through “care for yourself.” An open door, time, water, accompaniment or permission to leave may matter. These examples are no universal institutional checklist. They show the material side of what is called personal responsibility. Where a resource is unavailable, demanding cleanliness does not explain feasibility. No actual sanitation or technical adequacy is certified through this general account; appropriate conditions still need actual provision and, where required, relevant competence."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Time and space allow rest without requiring immediate sleep or recovery.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s4.p1",
            "quote": "Suitable time and space permit rest without guaranteeing immediate sleep or recovery. No sleep disorder is assessed or treated here. A break should not become a test requiring correct restoration. Conditions and results differ. Continued fatigue proves neither every pause useless, personal fault nor adequate external provision. Viktor’s actual state cannot be certified from the schedule or from knowing a room was provided. An opportunity can be real while a question about the result remains open."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Continued fatigue establishes neither fault, every break useless nor adequate conditions; sleep is not diagnosed.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s4.p1",
                "quote": "Suitable time and space permit rest without guaranteeing immediate sleep or recovery. No sleep disorder is assessed or treated here. A break should not become a test requiring correct restoration. Conditions and results differ. Continued fatigue proves neither every pause useless, personal fault nor adequate external provision. Viktor’s actual state cannot be certified from the schedule or from knowing a room was provided. An opportunity can be real while a question about the result remains open."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Off-shift transport, required acts, shared housing, light and noise can continue limiting rest.",
        "status": "author_observation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s4.p2",
            "quote": "External timing may continue off shift through transport, roll calls, shared housing, light and noise. No legal workday boundary is determined; actual days are considered. Formally free time need not mean control of the environment. Permission to lie down does not control lighting or others’ acts. This makes no neighbour automatically at fault. It shows why sleep cannot be described solely as choosing to turn off a phone or taking advice seriously enough."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No legal working-day boundary or automatic blame of every neighbour is determined.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s4.p2",
                "quote": "External timing may continue off shift through transport, roll calls, shared housing, light and noise. No legal workday boundary is determined; actual days are considered. Formally free time need not mean control of the environment. Permission to lie down does not control lighting or others’ acts. This makes no neighbour automatically at fault. It shows why sleep cannot be described solely as choosing to turn off a phone or taking advice seriously enough."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Hygiene needs material conditions, and a private request is not group-disclosure permission.",
        "status": "practice",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s5.p1",
            "quote": "Toilets, washing and necessary clean items do not appear through “care for yourself.” An open door, time, water, accompaniment or permission to leave may matter. These examples are no universal institutional checklist. They show the material side of what is called personal responsibility. Where a resource is unavailable, demanding cleanliness does not explain feasibility. No actual sanitation or technical adequacy is certified through this general account; appropriate conditions still need actual provision and, where required, relevant competence."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s5.p2",
            "quote": "A private need requires no announcement to everyone. Some information may be necessary for access, but recipients and scope matter. A toilet request grants no automatic permission to discuss health across a group. All legal exceptions and actual duties are not determined here. Request, needed clarification and wider disclosure differ. Kindness establishes no authority to hold data, prescribe actions or pass details to every interested person. Their role matters alongside the wish to be helpful."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Actual sanitation, every legal exception and a kind recipient’s authority are not established.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s5.p1",
                "quote": "Toilets, washing and necessary clean items do not appear through “care for yourself.” An open door, time, water, accompaniment or permission to leave may matter. These examples are no universal institutional checklist. They show the material side of what is called personal responsibility. Where a resource is unavailable, demanding cleanliness does not explain feasibility. No actual sanitation or technical adequacy is certified through this general account; appropriate conditions still need actual provision and, where required, relevant competence."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s5.p2",
                "quote": "A private need requires no announcement to everyone. Some information may be necessary for access, but recipients and scope matter. A toilet request grants no automatic permission to discuss health across a group. All legal exceptions and actual duties are not determined here. Request, needed clarification and wider disclosure differ. Kindness establishes no authority to hold data, prescribe actions or pass details to every interested person. Their role matters alongside the wish to be helpful."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Shortage authorises neither others’ property nor breaks, and one-off help is no inexhaustible stock.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s5.p3",
            "quote": "Needs may intersect in shared space. Viktor gains no automatic right to others’ possessions or breaks. That does not remove the need for organised access. Institutional provision and a participant’s conduct towards others are separate responsibilities. Shortage authorises no use of another’s vulnerability. A two-person conflict also need not explain the whole deficit: both may queue for a resource unsuited to the actual circumstances. Their disagreement does not automatically supply or identify the wider arrangement required."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s5.p4",
            "quote": "A one-off workaround should not become permanent duty. Someone’s help does not make time and energy inexhaustible shared stock. Both people may bear costs. Distinguish arranged access from chance participation, without reproaching a responsive helper. No complete reform is offered. A need should not be reported fully resolved because someone once compensated with personal resources. That episode can count as actual help while leaving unanswered how access will function when the helper is absent or cannot repeat the contribution."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Institutional responsibility does not disappear through a participant conflict; no complete reform is offered.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s5.p3",
                "quote": "Needs may intersect in shared space. Viktor gains no automatic right to others’ possessions or breaks. That does not remove the need for organised access. Institutional provision and a participant’s conduct towards others are separate responsibilities. Shortage authorises no use of another’s vulnerability. A two-person conflict also need not explain the whole deficit: both may queue for a resource unsuited to the actual circumstances. Their disagreement does not automatically supply or identify the wider arrangement required."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s5.p4",
                "quote": "A one-off workaround should not become permanent duty. Someone’s help does not make time and energy inexhaustible shared stock. Both people may bear costs. Distinguish arranged access from chance participation, without reproaching a responsive helper. No complete reform is offered. A need should not be reported fully resolved because someone once compensated with personal resources. That episode can count as actual help while leaving unanswered how access will function when the helper is absent or cannot repeat the contribution."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Institution-controlled movement and resources differ from being able simply to leave for necessities.",
        "status": "author_observation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p1",
            "quote": "Consider another fictional scene. Nikolai is in a controlled institution and cannot independently leave for water or an item. The category or lawfulness of detention is not determined. “Choose another dining area” or “go home” cannot describe this situation. Controlled movement gives needs an institutional dimension. Asking, permission, accompaniment and delivered resources differ. Explaining the proper request establishes no complete access. The person’s dependency should remain visible rather than being treated as solved once the institution has supplied the correct wording to use."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Category/lawfulness is undetermined; no cancellation of medical restrictions, dangerous need test or calm as an object’s substitute.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s6.p1",
                "quote": "Consider another fictional scene. Nikolai is in a controlled institution and cannot independently leave for water or an item. The category or lawfulness of detention is not determined. “Choose another dining area” or “go home” cannot describe this situation. Controlled movement gives needs an institutional dimension. Asking, permission, accompaniment and delivered resources differ. Explaining the proper request establishes no complete access. The person’s dependency should remain visible rather than being treated as solved once the institution has supplied the correct wording to use."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s6.p2",
                "quote": "Rules can have different grounds, including safety or individual care. This article authorises no cancellation of medical restrictions or prescribed arrangements through general language about need. An explanation called care is not automatically sufficient either. Where practicable, the restriction’s purpose, decision maker’s competence and actual provision matter. No legal or medical assessment is performed here. An author’s confidence in a fictional example cannot replace the particulars needed for a real decision about a person’s conditions or treatment."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s6.p3",
                "quote": "Nikolai need not prove missing access through deterioration, fasting, refusing water or another dangerous test. No control bypass or covert resource tactics are proposed. Immediate danger needs appropriate urgent assistance under actual conditions; availability is not presumed. Calm creates no object and transfers no institutional responsibility. Dependence may continue after a need is accurately named, without becoming a moral defect requiring greater endurance. No exercise should turn recognising a shortage into a reason to worsen it for more persuasive evidence."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Voluntary discipline and unavailable necessities may look similar but require different questions.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s7.p1",
            "quote": "People may choose early waking, dietary arrangements or religious discipline. Not every limit is coercion, but similar outward acts need not share conditions. Voluntary practice differs from missing necessities. Actual agreement, reconsideration and consequences of refusal matter. No particular religious practice is assessed or fasting prescribed. Another’s endurance establishes no suitable arrangement for someone else regardless of health and circumstances. A meaningful example can be respected without becoming a requirement for another person to repeat it or prove equivalent capacity."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s7.p2",
            "quote": "Shared meaning replaces no particular need. Work, community or discipline can matter alongside appropriate meal and rest time. Questioning conditions need not erase earlier value; gratitude grants no acceptance of every deprivation. Need also gives no general permission to breach actual duties or endanger others. These levels avoid a forced choice between endorsing the entire routine and declaring all experience false before a current need can be considered. One relevant obligation does not settle every different question concerning the conditions under which it is performed."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No fasting/regime prescription or practice assessment; prior agreement/gratitude does not amount to blanket acceptance of every later deprivation, and need cancels no real duties.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s7.p1",
                "quote": "People may choose early waking, dietary arrangements or religious discipline. Not every limit is coercion, but similar outward acts need not share conditions. Voluntary practice differs from missing necessities. Actual agreement, reconsideration and consequences of refusal matter. No particular religious practice is assessed or fasting prescribed. Another’s endurance establishes no suitable arrangement for someone else regardless of health and circumstances. A meaningful example can be respected without becoming a requirement for another person to repeat it or prove equivalent capacity."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s7.p2",
                "quote": "Shared meaning replaces no particular need. Work, community or discipline can matter alongside appropriate meal and rest time. Questioning conditions need not erase earlier value; gratitude grants no acceptance of every deprivation. Need also gives no general permission to breach actual duties or endanger others. These levels avoid a forced choice between endorsing the entire routine and declaring all experience false before a current need can be considered. One relevant obligation does not settle every different question concerning the conditions under which it is performed."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Spiritual support can matter without replacing water, sleep, safety or competent care.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s7.p3",
            "quote": "Spiritual language should not test whether someone has outgrown the body. Meaning guarantees neither water, sleep nor safety. This concerns explanatory limits, rather than rejecting spiritual life. Religious support can matter without replacing material provision or competent care. Its effect is not measured and abandonment is not advised. Correct faith, gratitude or calm should not become preliminary achievements before need deserves a suitable response. A source of meaning and a necessary external resource can remain valuable in different ways without either being assigned the other’s work."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Its effect is not measured or abandonment prescribed; correct faith/gratitude/calm is no preliminary examination.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s7.p3",
                "quote": "Spiritual language should not test whether someone has outgrown the body. Meaning guarantees neither water, sleep nor safety. This concerns explanatory limits, rather than rejecting spiritual life. Religious support can matter without replacing material provision or competent care. Its effect is not measured and abandonment is not advised. Correct faith, gratitude or calm should not become preliminary achievements before need deserves a suitable response. A source of meaning and a necessary external resource can remain valuable in different ways without either being assigned the other’s work."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Listener, decision maker and provider may differ; forwarding is not a resource delivered.",
        "status": "practice",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s8.p1",
            "quote": "Where conditions permit, ask about a concrete need: water, timing or room access. This is no universally safe complaint channel. Who hears, decides and provides may differ. “I will forward it” can be honest without being delivered water. A decision may still need a key, time and someone to act. Recognise actual steps without reporting resolution too soon or blaming every intermediary for lacking control over the whole arrangement. Their willingness and the resource’s availability need separate descriptions."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s8.p4",
            "quote": "Sometimes information is gained but access remains unchanged. Viktor knows where he asked, while meal times stay fixed; Nikolai names a need while the resource remains missing. Honest description should not blame insufficient politeness. A missing decision or object cannot be created through endless improvement of a request. Further contact, risk and suitable assistance remain separate questions, not verified possibilities for every reader. A person can have made a specific effort without either controlling the response or deserving the continued absence of the necessary resource."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No universal safe channel or answer guarantee; a missing decision/object cannot be supplied through endlessly improved politeness.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s8.p1",
                "quote": "Where conditions permit, ask about a concrete need: water, timing or room access. This is no universally safe complaint channel. Who hears, decides and provides may differ. “I will forward it” can be honest without being delivered water. A decision may still need a key, time and someone to act. Recognise actual steps without reporting resolution too soon or blaming every intermediary for lacking control over the whole arrangement. Their willingness and the resource’s availability need separate descriptions."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s8.p4",
                "quote": "Sometimes information is gained but access remains unchanged. Viktor knows where he asked, while meal times stay fixed; Nikolai names a need while the resource remains missing. Honest description should not blame insufficient politeness. A missing decision or object cannot be created through endless improvement of a request. Further contact, risk and suitable assistance remain separate questions, not verified possibilities for every reader. A person can have made a specific effort without either controlling the response or deserving the continued absence of the necessary resource."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Partial provision and one opportunity establish neither full recovery nor stable access.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s9.p1",
            "quote": "Part of a need may be met while fatigue remains. This neither erases the opportunity nor establishes everything necessary provided. Water received, eating, usable space and actual recovery differ. They should not merge into “everything is fine now.” No health assessment is made. Missing expected benefit is not ingratitude, and one favourable result certifies no adequate conditions overall. What has improved can retain its scope alongside a need that remains, without requiring either triumph or denial of the specific resource actually delivered."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s9.p2",
            "quote": "A resource may arrive once while regular access remains unknown. Today’s open room need not be fictitious help, but one opportunity and stable access differ. Viktor can value someone’s contribution while questioning arrangements. Neither gratitude nor questioning automatically settles every duty. Name what happened, how long a condition is known and what remains missing, without attaching a future promise to one successful episode. Acknowledging the actual help does not require reporting that its continuation has already been agreed or made practically reliable."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Specific help retains value; missing expected benefit is not ingratitude and no future promise is attached to one success.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s9.p1",
                "quote": "Part of a need may be met while fatigue remains. This neither erases the opportunity nor establishes everything necessary provided. Water received, eating, usable space and actual recovery differ. They should not merge into “everything is fine now.” No health assessment is made. Missing expected benefit is not ingratitude, and one favourable result certifies no adequate conditions overall. What has improved can retain its scope alongside a need that remains, without requiring either triumph or denial of the specific resource actually delivered."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s9.p2",
                "quote": "A resource may arrive once while regular access remains unknown. Today’s open room need not be fictitious help, but one opportunity and stable access differ. Viktor can value someone’s contribution while questioning arrangements. Neither gratitude nor questioning automatically settles every duty. Name what happened, how long a condition is known and what remains missing, without attaching a future promise to one successful episode. Acknowledging the actual help does not require reporting that its continuation has already been agreed or made practically reliable."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Dignity rewards neither health, endurance nor productivity.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s9.p4",
            "quote": "Dignity rewards neither health, endurance nor productivity. It remains when someone needs help, cannot recover quickly or cannot safely ask. This value does not promise water or suitable surroundings through respect alone: material needs remain material. Accurate naming matters without being sufficient. Spiritual support, caution and partial results may coexist with actual provision, without one resource replacing all absent others. A person’s worth should remain distinct from the practical question of what conditions and assistance have actually become accessible to them."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "This is a value boundary, not medical/legal finding or a promise that respect creates material conditions.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s9.p4",
                "quote": "Dignity rewards neither health, endurance nor productivity. It remains when someone needs help, cannot recover quickly or cannot safely ask. This value does not promise water or suitable surroundings through respect alone: material needs remain material. Accurate naming matters without being sufficient. Spiritual support, caution and partial results may coexist with actual provision, without one resource replacing all absent others. A person’s worth should remain distinct from the practical question of what conditions and assistance have actually become accessible to them."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s7.p4",
                "quote": "Illness, disability or limited energy do not diminish dignity when a shared regime does not fit. This is a value boundary, not medical assessment or a ruling on particular rights. Actual differences may need consideration even under identical demands. Someone else’s successful practice does not check an individual situation. Endurance comparison should not allocate necessities. Greater capacity gives no automatic authority over what another must withstand without help. A person’s limits require actual consideration rather than a verdict inferred from the most resilient participant’s experience."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Biblical sleep’s gift, Buddhist body/Nirvana context and institutional norms have distinct grounds.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s10.p1",
            "quote": "Psalm127 connects labour with trust in God and sleep as gift. [KJV](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%20127&version=KJV). The full text includes building, guarding and children. This is religious poetry, not a medical regime or judgement on early shifts. Sleeplessness does not mean God withholds love, and need requires no correct-faith test. The bounded comparison questions reducing life to uninterrupted effort. It promises no sleep and supplies no instruction replacing actual conditions or competent assistance where these are needed by the person involved."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s10.p2",
            "quote": "Dhammapada203–204 concerns hunger, body and health within Nirvana and spiritual life. [Selected197–208, Müller](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2017/pg2017-images.html). This is no medical classification or replacement of food through spiritual attitude. Valuing health diminishes no sick person’s dignity. The text should not require someone to cease needing or call deprivation useful. The comparison retains necessary conditions without promising clinical effects from reading, faith or inner agreement. It does not turn an ancient religious account of suffering and release into a treatment plan for a reader’s actual condition."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s10.p3",
            "quote": "Mandela Rules separately consider sleep conditions, sanitation, hygiene, bedding, food, water and clinical responsibility. [Selected Rules12–24 and27](https://cambodia.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/The%20Nelson%20Mandela%20Rules%20_%20Eng.pdf). This normative prisoner-treatment context is explicitly nonbinding in the resolution. It determines no local law or Nikolai’s category, inspects no institution and promises no enforcement. Numeric minima are not exported as individual prescriptions. Citation shows conditions should not wholly become personal discipline, but provides no verified remedy. The normative account and the reader’s actual means to obtain a resource remain separate."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S1",
          "S2",
          "S3"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No divine-love test through sleeplessness, diminished sick-person dignity, medical prescription, mandatory local enforcement or merged scientific model; numbers are not exported as individual regimes.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "s10.p1",
                "quote": "Psalm127 connects labour with trust in God and sleep as gift. [KJV](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%20127&version=KJV). The full text includes building, guarding and children. This is religious poetry, not a medical regime or judgement on early shifts. Sleeplessness does not mean God withholds love, and need requires no correct-faith test. The bounded comparison questions reducing life to uninterrupted effort. It promises no sleep and supplies no instruction replacing actual conditions or competent assistance where these are needed by the person involved."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s10.p2",
                "quote": "Dhammapada203–204 concerns hunger, body and health within Nirvana and spiritual life. [Selected197–208, Müller](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2017/pg2017-images.html). This is no medical classification or replacement of food through spiritual attitude. Valuing health diminishes no sick person’s dignity. The text should not require someone to cease needing or call deprivation useful. The comparison retains necessary conditions without promising clinical effects from reading, faith or inner agreement. It does not turn an ancient religious account of suffering and release into a treatment plan for a reader’s actual condition."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s10.p3",
                "quote": "Mandela Rules separately consider sleep conditions, sanitation, hygiene, bedding, food, water and clinical responsibility. [Selected Rules12–24 and27](https://cambodia.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/The%20Nelson%20Mandela%20Rules%20_%20Eng.pdf). This normative prisoner-treatment context is explicitly nonbinding in the resolution. It determines no local law or Nikolai’s category, inspects no institution and promises no enforcement. Numeric minima are not exported as individual prescriptions. Citation shows conditions should not wholly become personal discipline, but provides no verified remedy. The normative account and the reader’s actual means to obtain a resource remain separate."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "s10.p4",
                "quote": "The three grounds form no single instruction. Biblical gift, Buddhist spiritual context and institutional norms differ. This author’s comparison is no scientific health model or identity of traditions. No short passage checks a reader’s actual access. Material resource, ability to use it, individual condition and competent help remain distinct questions, not solved through a well-named need or quotation. Respect for the sources includes retaining their setting and limits, rather than presenting them as if they had already assessed or repaired the specific circumstances of the reader."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "limitations": [
      {
        "text": "No universal sleep/fluid/food/exertion/medicine prescription or cancellation of individual care.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s4.p3",
            "quote": "A personal habit may help where available and appropriate. No breathing, exertion, medicine or changed routine is prescribed as compulsory. Rest need not be earned through practice. Religious quotation and discipline replace no necessary assessment. Immediate health danger needs suitable urgent competent assistance; exercises should not delay it. No universal channel or always-available recipient is verified. General advice cannot establish whether a particular action is appropriate for the person’s actual condition and care arrangements."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p2",
            "quote": "Rules can have different grounds, including safety or individual care. This article authorises no cancellation of medical restrictions or prescribed arrangements through general language about need. An explanation called care is not automatically sufficient either. Where practicable, the restriction’s purpose, decision maker’s competence and actual provision matter. No legal or medical assessment is performed here. An author’s confidence in a fictional example cannot replace the particulars needed for a real decision about a person’s conditions or treatment."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s8.p2",
            "quote": "A request need not contain an entire health history where unnecessary. Actual medical or legal information requirements are not determined. Role and competence matter; willingness to advise is insufficient authority to prescribe. Necessary assistance should not become experimentation through a universal text. No doses, durations, fluid restrictions or exercise scheme are provided. Access clarification and individual health decisions differ, sometimes needing different people. One cannot be reported as completing the other merely because both concern the same bodily need or were discussed in a single conversation."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "No fasting, water refusal, dangerous test, control bypass or covert resource tactics; urgent help should not wait for exercises.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s6.p3",
            "quote": "Nikolai need not prove missing access through deterioration, fasting, refusing water or another dangerous test. No control bypass or covert resource tactics are proposed. Immediate danger needs appropriate urgent assistance under actual conditions; availability is not presumed. Calm creates no object and transfers no institutional responsibility. Dependence may continue after a need is accurately named, without becoming a moral defect requiring greater endurance. No exercise should turn recognising a shortage into a reason to worsen it for more persuasive evidence."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s4.p3",
            "quote": "A personal habit may help where available and appropriate. No breathing, exertion, medicine or changed routine is prescribed as compulsory. Rest need not be earned through practice. Religious quotation and discipline replace no necessary assessment. Immediate health danger needs suitable urgent competent assistance; exercises should not delay it. No universal channel or always-available recipient is verified. General advice cannot establish whether a particular action is appropriate for the person’s actual condition and care arrangements."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Practice is optional, with no compulsory notes or proof of correct self-care without means; it may be stopped.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "practice.p1",
            "quote": "If there is no immediate danger and reflection delays no needed help, choose one ordinary need with uncertain access. Do not test shortage through deprivation, await deterioration or deliberately break arrangements. Writing is optional and may be unavailable. This prescribes no regime and assesses no condition; skipping is allowed. The aim is one case’s circumstances, not proving correct self-care where resources are missing. The exercise should not turn a need into another opportunity to judge whether someone is sufficiently disciplined or able to manage everything alone."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "practice.p4",
            "quote": "Finish with what became clearer or arrived. A route obstacle may differ from reluctance to rest; a new resource may leave a larger question open. This is neither diagnosis nor fully changed conditions. Stop where strain increases or necessary tasks are obstructed, returning to an accessible action, rest or suitable help. Need is no shame; absent results diminish no dignity, and partial ones require no declaration that the whole arrangement is sufficient. The exercise can retain a modest use without being made responsible for resolving the wider circumstances."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Partial progress does not meet every need or transfer responsibility for the whole arrangement to the participant.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "s11.p1",
            "quote": "Viktor may gain a better interval without the whole day changing. That is improvement, not complete recovery. Nikolai may receive one item while other conditions remain. Partial progress need be neither total victory nor zero. Its value need not be denied for honesty about the whole; equally, it should not close every unconsidered question. The actual result keeps its scope rather than being assigned responsibility for justifying the entire arrangement or proving that no additional condition, decision or assistance remains necessary."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "s11.p3",
            "quote": "Caution may help once without making a participant sole organiser of rest under another’s control of time and surroundings. Actual duties remain; whole-system responsibility does not automatically transfer. Personal acts and external gaps can both be considered without one permanent explanation. Change is not guaranteed. This avoids assigning every shortage to personal failure or turning bodily respect into another standard someone must perform perfectly under every restriction. The point is a more accurate division of questions, not a certificate that either side is automatically correct about the whole situation."
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "evidence_blocks": [
    {
      "block_id": "s1.p1",
      "section_id": "s1",
      "article_anchor": "#s1",
      "quote": "Imagine Viktor at a work site with a twenty-minute break. Walking to the dining area and back takes eight minutes; queuing takes seven, leaving five for eating. This is fictional arithmetic, not an acceptable standard or advice to eat in five minutes. Following a timetable may still leave an inadequate opportunity. Announced duration, travel and remaining usable time differ; the label “break” makes them neither equal nor sufficient."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s2.p1",
      "section_id": "s2",
      "article_anchor": "#s2",
      "quote": "Fatigue, hunger, thirst and needing a toilet are not one emotion met through one response. No particular sensation’s cause or medical severity is assessed here. Someone may name a need without a complete explanation. Asking for water need not become a public endurance test. An appropriate act may nevertheless depend on health, competent assistance and actual conditions rather than a general sentence. Naming the subject is not diagnosing or prescribing its solution."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s3.p1",
      "section_id": "s3",
      "article_anchor": "#s3",
      "quote": "Water may be behind a locked door; meals available while a post cannot be left; a rest room occupied by a compulsory meeting. These fictional gaps differ. Resource presence, permission, reachability and usable timing do not coincide. One establishes none of the others. Specific wording can identify what is missing without promising change or making every restriction safe to test. A room’s existence does not say when or how someone can actually use it."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s4.p1",
      "section_id": "s4",
      "article_anchor": "#s4",
      "quote": "Suitable time and space permit rest without guaranteeing immediate sleep or recovery. No sleep disorder is assessed or treated here. A break should not become a test requiring correct restoration. Conditions and results differ. Continued fatigue proves neither every pause useless, personal fault nor adequate external provision. Viktor’s actual state cannot be certified from the schedule or from knowing a room was provided. An opportunity can be real while a question about the result remains open."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s6.p1",
      "section_id": "s6",
      "article_anchor": "#s6",
      "quote": "Consider another fictional scene. Nikolai is in a controlled institution and cannot independently leave for water or an item. The category or lawfulness of detention is not determined. “Choose another dining area” or “go home” cannot describe this situation. Controlled movement gives needs an institutional dimension. Asking, permission, accompaniment and delivered resources differ. Explaining the proper request establishes no complete access. The person’s dependency should remain visible rather than being treated as solved once the institution has supplied the correct wording to use."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s6.p3",
      "section_id": "s6",
      "article_anchor": "#s6",
      "quote": "Nikolai need not prove missing access through deterioration, fasting, refusing water or another dangerous test. No control bypass or covert resource tactics are proposed. Immediate danger needs appropriate urgent assistance under actual conditions; availability is not presumed. Calm creates no object and transfers no institutional responsibility. Dependence may continue after a need is accurately named, without becoming a moral defect requiring greater endurance. No exercise should turn recognising a shortage into a reason to worsen it for more persuasive evidence."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s9.p1",
      "section_id": "s9",
      "article_anchor": "#s9",
      "quote": "Part of a need may be met while fatigue remains. This neither erases the opportunity nor establishes everything necessary provided. Water received, eating, usable space and actual recovery differ. They should not merge into “everything is fine now.” No health assessment is made. Missing expected benefit is not ingratitude, and one favourable result certifies no adequate conditions overall. What has improved can retain its scope alongside a need that remains, without requiring either triumph or denial of the specific resource actually delivered."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s9.p4",
      "section_id": "s9",
      "article_anchor": "#s9",
      "quote": "Dignity rewards neither health, endurance nor productivity. It remains when someone needs help, cannot recover quickly or cannot safely ask. This value does not promise water or suitable surroundings through respect alone: material needs remain material. Accurate naming matters without being sufficient. Spiritual support, caution and partial results may coexist with actual provision, without one resource replacing all absent others. A person’s worth should remain distinct from the practical question of what conditions and assistance have actually become accessible to them."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s4.p2",
      "section_id": "s4",
      "article_anchor": "#s4",
      "quote": "External timing may continue off shift through transport, roll calls, shared housing, light and noise. No legal workday boundary is determined; actual days are considered. Formally free time need not mean control of the environment. Permission to lie down does not control lighting or others’ acts. This makes no neighbour automatically at fault. It shows why sleep cannot be described solely as choosing to turn off a phone or taking advice seriously enough."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s5.p1",
      "section_id": "s5",
      "article_anchor": "#s5",
      "quote": "Toilets, washing and necessary clean items do not appear through “care for yourself.” An open door, time, water, accompaniment or permission to leave may matter. These examples are no universal institutional checklist. They show the material side of what is called personal responsibility. Where a resource is unavailable, demanding cleanliness does not explain feasibility. No actual sanitation or technical adequacy is certified through this general account; appropriate conditions still need actual provision and, where required, relevant competence."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s1.p3",
      "section_id": "s1",
      "article_anchor": "#s1",
      "quote": "A break may include required acts: returning tools, reaching an exit, obtaining permission or changing clothes. This determines no jurisdiction’s working-time rules. The practical question is what remains under someone’s control. Identical timetable numbers can produce different access where one person is nearby and another passes several mandatory stages. Equal minutes alone cannot replace those circumstances. Available time therefore needs description alongside the route and requirements attached to using it."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s1.p2",
      "section_id": "s1",
      "article_anchor": "#s1",
      "quote": "A queue does not establish deliberate deprivation. Organisation, staffing, timing or coordination may be missing. The cause needs consideration, but unproved malice adds no minutes and supplies no meal. A gap between promised opportunity and available action can be discussed without declaring the whole site unsafe or proving someone intended deprivation first. Arrangement and intention need not coincide for an actual shortage to exist and deserve a concrete description."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s2.p2",
      "section_id": "s2",
      "article_anchor": "#s2",
      "quote": "Enduring inconvenience differs from no longer needing a resource. Viktor’s repeated queues establish no adequate access. One difficult day establishes neither overall health nor an entire arrangement’s quality. Retain a specific observation: what was accessible, what failed and what repetition is actually known. No endurance limit should be tested for persuasive evidence, and deterioration should not be awaited before considering need. A concrete shortage can be described without manufacturing a more dramatic demonstration."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s3.p2",
      "section_id": "s3",
      "article_anchor": "#s3",
      "quote": "Physical reachability also varies. Distance, stairs, objects carried and individual limitations change practical possibility. No health or actual accommodation entitlement is determined. Identical instructions establish no identical access. The real route can matter alongside a door on a plan. Assistance is not arranged merely because someone could theoretically provide it or the space is formally for everyone. A possible helper and a person actually able and available to assist are different resources."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s3.p3",
      "section_id": "s3",
      "article_anchor": "#s3",
      "quote": "Suitability differs from presence. A rest area may not offer sitting, quiet or its intended function. No universal room standard is prescribed. Ask whether use matches the promise. Opening a room and making it usable during an available interval are separate results. The first need not be dismissed; neither should a sign and unlocked door be reported as fully meeting the need. The actual task still depends on the circumstances in which the room can be used."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s5.p2",
      "section_id": "s5",
      "article_anchor": "#s5",
      "quote": "A private need requires no announcement to everyone. Some information may be necessary for access, but recipients and scope matter. A toilet request grants no automatic permission to discuss health across a group. All legal exceptions and actual duties are not determined here. Request, needed clarification and wider disclosure differ. Kindness establishes no authority to hold data, prescribe actions or pass details to every interested person. Their role matters alongside the wish to be helpful."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s5.p3",
      "section_id": "s5",
      "article_anchor": "#s5",
      "quote": "Needs may intersect in shared space. Viktor gains no automatic right to others’ possessions or breaks. That does not remove the need for organised access. Institutional provision and a participant’s conduct towards others are separate responsibilities. Shortage authorises no use of another’s vulnerability. A two-person conflict also need not explain the whole deficit: both may queue for a resource unsuited to the actual circumstances. Their disagreement does not automatically supply or identify the wider arrangement required."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s5.p4",
      "section_id": "s5",
      "article_anchor": "#s5",
      "quote": "A one-off workaround should not become permanent duty. Someone’s help does not make time and energy inexhaustible shared stock. Both people may bear costs. Distinguish arranged access from chance participation, without reproaching a responsive helper. No complete reform is offered. A need should not be reported fully resolved because someone once compensated with personal resources. That episode can count as actual help while leaving unanswered how access will function when the helper is absent or cannot repeat the contribution."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s7.p1",
      "section_id": "s7",
      "article_anchor": "#s7",
      "quote": "People may choose early waking, dietary arrangements or religious discipline. Not every limit is coercion, but similar outward acts need not share conditions. Voluntary practice differs from missing necessities. Actual agreement, reconsideration and consequences of refusal matter. No particular religious practice is assessed or fasting prescribed. Another’s endurance establishes no suitable arrangement for someone else regardless of health and circumstances. A meaningful example can be respected without becoming a requirement for another person to repeat it or prove equivalent capacity."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s7.p2",
      "section_id": "s7",
      "article_anchor": "#s7",
      "quote": "Shared meaning replaces no particular need. Work, community or discipline can matter alongside appropriate meal and rest time. Questioning conditions need not erase earlier value; gratitude grants no acceptance of every deprivation. Need also gives no general permission to breach actual duties or endanger others. These levels avoid a forced choice between endorsing the entire routine and declaring all experience false before a current need can be considered. One relevant obligation does not settle every different question concerning the conditions under which it is performed."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s7.p3",
      "section_id": "s7",
      "article_anchor": "#s7",
      "quote": "Spiritual language should not test whether someone has outgrown the body. Meaning guarantees neither water, sleep nor safety. This concerns explanatory limits, rather than rejecting spiritual life. Religious support can matter without replacing material provision or competent care. Its effect is not measured and abandonment is not advised. Correct faith, gratitude or calm should not become preliminary achievements before need deserves a suitable response. A source of meaning and a necessary external resource can remain valuable in different ways without either being assigned the other’s work."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s8.p1",
      "section_id": "s8",
      "article_anchor": "#s8",
      "quote": "Where conditions permit, ask about a concrete need: water, timing or room access. This is no universally safe complaint channel. Who hears, decides and provides may differ. “I will forward it” can be honest without being delivered water. A decision may still need a key, time and someone to act. Recognise actual steps without reporting resolution too soon or blaming every intermediary for lacking control over the whole arrangement. Their willingness and the resource’s availability need separate descriptions."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s8.p4",
      "section_id": "s8",
      "article_anchor": "#s8",
      "quote": "Sometimes information is gained but access remains unchanged. Viktor knows where he asked, while meal times stay fixed; Nikolai names a need while the resource remains missing. Honest description should not blame insufficient politeness. A missing decision or object cannot be created through endless improvement of a request. Further contact, risk and suitable assistance remain separate questions, not verified possibilities for every reader. A person can have made a specific effort without either controlling the response or deserving the continued absence of the necessary resource."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s9.p2",
      "section_id": "s9",
      "article_anchor": "#s9",
      "quote": "A resource may arrive once while regular access remains unknown. Today’s open room need not be fictitious help, but one opportunity and stable access differ. Viktor can value someone’s contribution while questioning arrangements. Neither gratitude nor questioning automatically settles every duty. Name what happened, how long a condition is known and what remains missing, without attaching a future promise to one successful episode. Acknowledging the actual help does not require reporting that its continuation has already been agreed or made practically reliable."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s10.p1",
      "section_id": "s10",
      "article_anchor": "#s10",
      "quote": "Psalm127 connects labour with trust in God and sleep as gift. [KJV](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%20127&version=KJV). The full text includes building, guarding and children. This is religious poetry, not a medical regime or judgement on early shifts. Sleeplessness does not mean God withholds love, and need requires no correct-faith test. The bounded comparison questions reducing life to uninterrupted effort. It promises no sleep and supplies no instruction replacing actual conditions or competent assistance where these are needed by the person involved."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s10.p2",
      "section_id": "s10",
      "article_anchor": "#s10",
      "quote": "Dhammapada203–204 concerns hunger, body and health within Nirvana and spiritual life. [Selected197–208, Müller](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2017/pg2017-images.html). This is no medical classification or replacement of food through spiritual attitude. Valuing health diminishes no sick person’s dignity. The text should not require someone to cease needing or call deprivation useful. The comparison retains necessary conditions without promising clinical effects from reading, faith or inner agreement. It does not turn an ancient religious account of suffering and release into a treatment plan for a reader’s actual condition."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s10.p3",
      "section_id": "s10",
      "article_anchor": "#s10",
      "quote": "Mandela Rules separately consider sleep conditions, sanitation, hygiene, bedding, food, water and clinical responsibility. [Selected Rules12–24 and27](https://cambodia.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/The%20Nelson%20Mandela%20Rules%20_%20Eng.pdf). This normative prisoner-treatment context is explicitly nonbinding in the resolution. It determines no local law or Nikolai’s category, inspects no institution and promises no enforcement. Numeric minima are not exported as individual prescriptions. Citation shows conditions should not wholly become personal discipline, but provides no verified remedy. The normative account and the reader’s actual means to obtain a resource remain separate."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s4.p3",
      "section_id": "s4",
      "article_anchor": "#s4",
      "quote": "A personal habit may help where available and appropriate. No breathing, exertion, medicine or changed routine is prescribed as compulsory. Rest need not be earned through practice. Religious quotation and discipline replace no necessary assessment. Immediate health danger needs suitable urgent competent assistance; exercises should not delay it. No universal channel or always-available recipient is verified. General advice cannot establish whether a particular action is appropriate for the person’s actual condition and care arrangements."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s6.p2",
      "section_id": "s6",
      "article_anchor": "#s6",
      "quote": "Rules can have different grounds, including safety or individual care. This article authorises no cancellation of medical restrictions or prescribed arrangements through general language about need. An explanation called care is not automatically sufficient either. Where practicable, the restriction’s purpose, decision maker’s competence and actual provision matter. No legal or medical assessment is performed here. An author’s confidence in a fictional example cannot replace the particulars needed for a real decision about a person’s conditions or treatment."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s8.p2",
      "section_id": "s8",
      "article_anchor": "#s8",
      "quote": "A request need not contain an entire health history where unnecessary. Actual medical or legal information requirements are not determined. Role and competence matter; willingness to advise is insufficient authority to prescribe. Necessary assistance should not become experimentation through a universal text. No doses, durations, fluid restrictions or exercise scheme are provided. Access clarification and individual health decisions differ, sometimes needing different people. One cannot be reported as completing the other merely because both concern the same bodily need or were discussed in a single conversation."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "practice.p1",
      "section_id": "practice",
      "article_anchor": "#practice",
      "quote": "If there is no immediate danger and reflection delays no needed help, choose one ordinary need with uncertain access. Do not test shortage through deprivation, await deterioration or deliberately break arrangements. Writing is optional and may be unavailable. This prescribes no regime and assesses no condition; skipping is allowed. The aim is one case’s circumstances, not proving correct self-care where resources are missing. The exercise should not turn a need into another opportunity to judge whether someone is sufficiently disciplined or able to manage everything alone."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "practice.p4",
      "section_id": "practice",
      "article_anchor": "#practice",
      "quote": "Finish with what became clearer or arrived. A route obstacle may differ from reluctance to rest; a new resource may leave a larger question open. This is neither diagnosis nor fully changed conditions. Stop where strain increases or necessary tasks are obstructed, returning to an accessible action, rest or suitable help. Need is no shame; absent results diminish no dignity, and partial ones require no declaration that the whole arrangement is sufficient. The exercise can retain a modest use without being made responsible for resolving the wider circumstances."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s11.p1",
      "section_id": "s11",
      "article_anchor": "#s11",
      "quote": "Viktor may gain a better interval without the whole day changing. That is improvement, not complete recovery. Nikolai may receive one item while other conditions remain. Partial progress need be neither total victory nor zero. Its value need not be denied for honesty about the whole; equally, it should not close every unconsidered question. The actual result keeps its scope rather than being assigned responsibility for justifying the entire arrangement or proving that no additional condition, decision or assistance remains necessary."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s11.p3",
      "section_id": "s11",
      "article_anchor": "#s11",
      "quote": "Caution may help once without making a participant sole organiser of rest under another’s control of time and surroundings. Actual duties remain; whole-system responsibility does not automatically transfer. Personal acts and external gaps can both be considered without one permanent explanation. Change is not guaranteed. This avoids assigning every shortage to personal failure or turning bodily respect into another standard someone must perform perfectly under every restriction. The point is a more accurate division of questions, not a certificate that either side is automatically correct about the whole situation."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s4.p4",
      "section_id": "s4",
      "article_anchor": "#s4",
      "quote": "Quiet time is not necessarily complete recovery. Some relief may coexist with inadequate overall rest; suitable surroundings may produce no noticed change now. Neither requires one character judgement. Name what happened rather than demanding expected positive feedback. Pause, access, resting and result relate without coinciding. No formula converts quiet minutes into guaranteed health or energy. These distinctions preserve an opportunity’s actual value without making a person responsible for reporting a result that has not yet occurred."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s7.p4",
      "section_id": "s7",
      "article_anchor": "#s7",
      "quote": "Illness, disability or limited energy do not diminish dignity when a shared regime does not fit. This is a value boundary, not medical assessment or a ruling on particular rights. Actual differences may need consideration even under identical demands. Someone else’s successful practice does not check an individual situation. Endurance comparison should not allocate necessities. Greater capacity gives no automatic authority over what another must withstand without help. A person’s limits require actual consideration rather than a verdict inferred from the most resilient participant’s experience."
    },
    {
      "block_id": "s10.p4",
      "section_id": "s10",
      "article_anchor": "#s10",
      "quote": "The three grounds form no single instruction. Biblical gift, Buddhist spiritual context and institutional norms differ. This author’s comparison is no scientific health model or identity of traditions. No short passage checks a reader’s actual access. Material resource, ability to use it, individual condition and competent help remain distinct questions, not solved through a well-named need or quotation. Respect for the sources includes retaining their setting and limits, rather than presenting them as if they had already assessed or repaired the specific circumstances of the reader."
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "q": "Does a twenty-minute break already establish food access?",
      "a": "No: fictional travel of eight minutes and queuing of seven leave five. This is no standard; required stages and actual time differ, and no legal calculation is performed.",
      "article_sections": [
        "s1"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "s1.p1",
          "quote": "Imagine Viktor at a work site with a twenty-minute break. Walking to the dining area and back takes eight minutes; queuing takes seven, leaving five for eating. This is fictional arithmetic, not an acceptable standard or advice to eat in five minutes. Following a timetable may still leave an inadequate opportunity. Announced duration, travel and remaining usable time differ; the label “break” makes them neither equal nor sufficient."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s1.p3",
          "quote": "A break may include required acts: returning tools, reaching an exit, obtaining permission or changing clothes. This determines no jurisdiction’s working-time rules. The practical question is what remains under someone’s control. Identical timetable numbers can produce different access where one person is nearby and another passes several mandatory stages. Equal minutes alone cannot replace those circumstances. Available time therefore needs description alongside the route and requirements attached to using it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Does a provided place require immediate recovery?",
      "a": "No: conditions and result differ. Continued fatigue establishes neither personal fault nor a useless break; minutes do not become guaranteed health.",
      "article_sections": [
        "s4"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "s4.p1",
          "quote": "Suitable time and space permit rest without guaranteeing immediate sleep or recovery. No sleep disorder is assessed or treated here. A break should not become a test requiring correct restoration. Conditions and results differ. Continued fatigue proves neither every pause useless, personal fault nor adequate external provision. Viktor’s actual state cannot be certified from the schedule or from knowing a room was provided. An opportunity can be real while a question about the result remains open."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s4.p4",
          "quote": "Quiet time is not necessarily complete recovery. Some relief may coexist with inadequate overall rest; suitable surroundings may produce no noticed change now. Neither requires one character judgement. Name what happened rather than demanding expected positive feedback. Pause, access, resting and result relate without coinciding. No formula converts quiet minutes into guaranteed health or energy. These distinctions preserve an opportunity’s actual value without making a person responsible for reporting a result that has not yet occurred."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Does forwarding a request mean water has arrived?",
      "a": "No: listener, decision maker and provider may differ. Forwarding and a named decision can still need a key, time and someone to act; polite wording alone supplies no missing object.",
      "article_sections": [
        "s8"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "s8.p1",
          "quote": "Where conditions permit, ask about a concrete need: water, timing or room access. This is no universally safe complaint channel. Who hears, decides and provides may differ. “I will forward it” can be honest without being delivered water. A decision may still need a key, time and someone to act. Recognise actual steps without reporting resolution too soon or blaming every intermediary for lacking control over the whole arrangement. Their willingness and the resource’s availability need separate descriptions."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s8.p4",
          "quote": "Sometimes information is gained but access remains unchanged. Viktor knows where he asked, while meal times stay fixed; Nikolai names a need while the resource remains missing. Honest description should not blame insufficient politeness. A missing decision or object cannot be created through endless improvement of a request. Further contact, risk and suitable assistance remain separate questions, not verified possibilities for every reader. A person can have made a specific effort without either controlling the response or deserving the continued absence of the necessary resource."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Can prescribed arrangements be changed through this article?",
      "a": "No treatment, durations, fluid amounts or exertion are prescribed. Individual decisions and access clarification differ; necessary competent help is not replaced by a general text.",
      "article_sections": [
        "s4",
        "s8"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "s4.p3",
          "quote": "A personal habit may help where available and appropriate. No breathing, exertion, medicine or changed routine is prescribed as compulsory. Rest need not be earned through practice. Religious quotation and discipline replace no necessary assessment. Immediate health danger needs suitable urgent competent assistance; exercises should not delay it. No universal channel or always-available recipient is verified. General advice cannot establish whether a particular action is appropriate for the person’s actual condition and care arrangements."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "s8.p2",
          "quote": "A request need not contain an entire health history where unnecessary. Actual medical or legal information requirements are not determined. Role and competence matter; willingness to advise is insufficient authority to prescribe. Necessary assistance should not become experimentation through a universal text. No doses, durations, fluid restrictions or exercise scheme are provided. Access clarification and individual health decisions differ, sometimes needing different people. One cannot be reported as completing the other merely because both concern the same bodily need or were discussed in a single conversation."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "S1",
      "author": "Psalm127, King James Version",
      "title": "Psalm127, complete five verses",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%20127&version=KJV",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "read_scope": "Allfiveverses49–56 and edition/publicdomain60–62 actually read successfulturn90view0. Initialturn89view0metadataonly notcountedasreading. Not original/commentary/Psalter.",
      "role": "Six-wordverse2epigraph and bounded trust/labour/sleepgiftcomparison in X.",
      "limits": "Divinebuilding/guarding/trust andchildren/arrowsfullcontext, not insomnia meansunloved, wrongfaith/earlyshiftblame, medicalsleepregime or violenceinstruction. No sleepguarantee.",
      "rights_status": "KJV_PAGE_MARKED_PUBLIC_DOMAIN_GLOBAL_JURISDICTIONS_UNASSESSED",
      "rights_notes": "Brief attributed English quote, own RU/TH translations; no fullpsalm/page or worldwideclearance.",
      "search_executor": "Codex web.run, branch F author"
    },
    {
      "id": "S2",
      "author": "F.MaxMüller, translator from Pali",
      "title": "Dhammapada, ChapterXV,197–208",
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2017/pg2017-images.html",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "read_scope": "CompleteChapterXV400–421 actually read turn89view2 fornewscope, notearlier125visiblecontextsubstitution. Hunger/body/health/rest/Nirvana/spiritualcompany considered. Samepreviouslycheckededitionmetadatareused. Not Pali/wholebook/commentaries.",
      "role": "Six-word204key and bounded bodily/spiritualcontextcomparison in X.",
      "limits": "Not medicalclassification/diet/clinicalefficacy, lower sick/disabled dignity, ignoringneeds orspiritualsubstituteforfood/water/care. No individualregime.",
      "rights_status": "HISTORICAL_TRANSLATION_US_PUBLIC_DOMAIN_GLOBAL_RIGHTS_UNASSESSED",
      "rights_notes": "Six English quoted words, own RU/TH translations; no fullpassage/page or globalclearance.",
      "search_executor": "Codex web.run, branch F author"
    },
    {
      "id": "S3",
      "author": "United Nations General Assembly",
      "title": "A/RES/70/175, Mandela Rules12–24/27; earlier checked1–5/preliminary/nonbindingcontext",
      "url": "https://cambodia.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/The%20Nelson%20Mandela%20Rules%20_%20Eng.pdf",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20",
      "read_scope": "OfficialOHCHR34pagecopy: completeRules12–23,477–552;Rule24complete554–562;Rule27complete581–588 actually read turn89view1. Other visibleRulesnotadopted. Reuse125verifiedpreliminaryobservations/Rules1–5 andresolutionpara8nonbinding257–262 turn85view0. Not fullPDF, actualinstitution/local law/case/channel/implementation.",
      "role": "Brief normative comparison of actual provision and clinical responsibility in X.",
      "limits": "Prisoner-treatment scope/nonbinding qualification, notlocalentitlement, Nikolai’slegalcategoryorlawfulness, inspection/remedy/enforcement. Numericminimumsnotexportedasindividualprescriptions; clinicaldecisionsnottransferredtolayreaders.",
      "rights_status": "LIMITED_ATTRIBUTED_PARAPHRASE",
      "rights_notes": "No directquote/fullrules/PDFrepublication or globalclearance.",
      "search_executor": "Codex web.run, branch F author"
    }
  ],
  "acceptance": {
    "author_semantic_review": "AUTHOR_REVIEWED_WITH_NOTES",
    "local_inner_schema": "PASS",
    "production_compatibility": "NOT_RUN",
    "independent_review": "NOT_RUN",
    "server_auto_acceptance": "NOT_RUN",
    "import": "NOT_RUN",
    "indexing": "NOT_RUN",
    "human_acceptance": "NOT_RUN",
    "publication": "NOT_RUN"
  }
}