# When work is used for unlawful transportation For a warehouse or transport worker who discovers unlawful use of their work and then faces a demand to continue with a stated threat. Fictional adult Vera works in a warehouse: the shipment’s illegality and the new demand are given, while initial knowledge, actual coercion, a later act and legal outcomes remain unestablished. - Why does learning now prove neither earlier knowledge nor initial ignorance? - How does a demand with a threat differ from established coercion? - Why does pressure not justify every harm, while an act alone does not prove freedom? - What limits the named non-punishment principle? The [full article](ARTICLE_EN.md) distinguishes roles, knowledge, timing, pressure and responsibility. It supplies no cargo-inspection, continuing-for-evidence, concealment or interview-account instructions. Safe action, help and legal outcomes are unselected; contact is not help. The later stage is conditional and promises no rapid restoration. Earlier help does not make every connection safe or require immediate contact. ---