{
  "schema_version": "uw.editorial_geo.v1",
  "article_index": "SYS-177",
  "catalog_id": "SYS-177",
  "language": "en",
  "revision": "systems-20261020.1",
  "revision_scope": "local_editorial_only",
  "headline": "A company with violations and a business built around crime: different employee positions",
  "master_filename": "ARTICLE_EN.md",
  "master_sha256": "bdf4fe8463e3a486581b833f743c572db65056b2ada11cca9d2966b582b1da23",
  "short_answer": "A business's character does not exhaust an employee's position. A violation within activity, crime as its purpose and mixed operations need distinguishing; title, action and knowledge at a particular time are also distinct. An organisational assessment cannot automatically become the same answer for every worker.",
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "C01",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "A violation within activity differs from crime as its purpose through the practice's function.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. A violation within a business and crime as its purpose"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B03",
          "quote": "But examining that violation differs from examining a supposed service designed to produce a criminal result."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B03",
          "quote": "The distinction concerns a practice's function rather than an attractive signboard."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "These are analytical distinctions rather than completed legal classifications.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B03",
              "quote": "These are analytical distinctions, not ready-made legal classifications."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "These are analytical distinctions rather than completed legal classifications."
    },
    {
      "id": "C02",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "An office, uniform, contract and regular wages cannot establish every instruction's lawfulness.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S3"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Outward normality cannot answer for an activity's contents"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B04",
          "quote": "An office, uniform, employment contract and regular wages explain some aspects of work."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B04",
          "quote": "They cannot establish every instruction's lawfulness."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "A small new firm or imperfect administration also establishes no criminal scheme.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B04",
              "quote": "Equally, its absence proves no crime: a small new firm or imperfect administration is not an established criminal scheme."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "A small new firm or imperfect administration also establishes no criminal scheme."
    },
    {
      "id": "C03",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Job title, act, knowledge then and powers need distinguishing.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Job title, action and knowledge are different questions"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B05",
          "quote": "A title says less than an instruction's contents."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B05",
          "quote": "What someone did, what they knew then and what authority they had need distinguishing."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "These questions provide no ready-made legal test or automatic minor-role exoneration.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B05",
              "quote": "These questions are not a ready-made legal test; their relevance needs case-specific assessment."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B05",
              "quote": "They grant neither automatic exoneration through a minor role nor grounds to accuse everyone whose work benefits an organisation."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "These questions provide no ready-made legal test or automatic minor-role exoneration."
    },
    {
      "id": "C04",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Alongside the drug trade, proximity, ordinary service, knowledge and participation are not one position.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "V. Mixed operations and work alongside the drug trade"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B07",
          "quote": "Work and income alongside the drug trade form a distinct context."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B07",
          "quote": "Proximity, ordinary service, knowledge of others' activity and particular participation are not one position."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "An ordinary occupation grants no immunity; substance status, authorisation and national offences remain undetermined.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B07",
              "quote": "An ordinary occupation nevertheless grants no personal immunity."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B07",
              "quote": "This article determines no substance's status, authorisation or offence in a particular country."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "An ordinary occupation grants no immunity; substance status, authorisation and national offences remain undetermined."
    },
    {
      "id": "C05",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "A company and an individual are different subjects; outcomes cannot simply be transferred between these levels.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S3"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. Corporate and individual responsibility differ"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B09",
          "quote": "A legal entity and an individual are different subjects."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B09",
          "quote": "Outcomes cannot simply be transferred between these levels."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Neither treaty applicability nor a reader's position is established.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B09",
              "quote": "This establishes neither treaty applicability nor a reader's position."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Neither treaty applicability nor a reader's position is established."
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "id": "F01",
      "q": "Is a company violation the same as business for a criminal result?",
      "a": "The article distinguishes a practice's function. This is an analytical framework, not an organisational legal classification.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C01"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. A violation within a business and crime as its purpose"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F02",
      "q": "Do an office and normal wages validate an entire instruction?",
      "a": "No. Outward normality cannot answer for every act; a lack of outward order also proves no crime.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C02"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S3"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Outward normality cannot answer for an activity's contents"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F03",
      "q": "Does a minor job title automatically exclude responsibility?",
      "a": "No such guarantee is supplied. Acts, knowledge and powers need assessment for the actual place and case.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C03"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Job title, action and knowledge are different questions"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F04",
      "q": "Does work alongside the drug trade mean everyone participates identically?",
      "a": "Proximity, service, knowledge and participation differ. This grants no personal immunity or national legal finding.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C04"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "V. Mixed operations and work alongside the drug trade"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F05",
      "q": "Does a company outcome determine every employee's position?",
      "a": "No automatic transfer joins a legal entity to an individual. Applicability and personal assessment need separate consideration.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C05"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S3"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. Corporate and individual responsibility differ"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "S1",
      "author": "Proverbs,KJV",
      "title": "Proverbs18:13",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs+18%3A13&version=KJV",
      "read_scope": "Complete verse49 and version/rights57–59; not whole chapter",
      "rights_status": "PAGE_MARKED_PUBLIC_DOMAIN; WORLDWIDE_NOT_ASSESSED",
      "role": "Brief opening fragment; no mandatory private investigation",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S2",
      "author": "Immanuel Kant; T.K.Abbott",
      "title": "Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals,II",
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/5682/pg5682-images.html",
      "read_scope": "Selected430–450, especially434/440/447–448; SYS173 edition verification reused; not entire work",
      "rights_status": "US_PUBLIC_DOMAIN_LABEL; WORLDWIDE_NOT_ASSESSED",
      "role": "Short humanity-formula fragment; lying-promise comparison not legal test",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S3",
      "author": "UNODC",
      "title": "Organized Crime Module4:Liability of Legal Persons",
      "url": "https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/en/education/tertiary/organized-crime/module-4/key-issues/liability-legal-persons.html",
      "read_scope": "Selected main1343–1366 including reproduced UNTOC10; article uses1345–1358, not full convention/all modules",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN",
      "role": "Legal structures, individual/legal person and differing national models",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S4",
      "author": "OECD",
      "title": "Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct,2023",
      "url": "https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/06/oecd-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-on-responsible-business-conduct_a0b49990/81f92357-en.pdf",
      "read_scope": "Selected I.1–2 lines237–250 P13; II.A.11–13 lines331–343 P15–16; also selected IV754–833, not all79pages",
      "rights_status": "OECD_COPYRIGHT_2023; OTHER_TERMS_UNKNOWN",
      "role": "Enterprise caused/contributed/directly linked distinction; no individual criminal exemption",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    }
  ],
  "retrieval_limits": [
    "Hypothetical scenes; no legal classification of an organisation, personal guilt, immunity or safe way to resign established. No absolute confidentiality, protected-report status or general right to refuse every official question established. No private company investigation, others' access or dangerous test recommended. Immediate danger gives urgent assistance priority."
  ],
  "article_blocks": [
    {
      "id": "B01",
      "heading": "Epigraph"
    },
    {
      "id": "B02",
      "heading": "What this article is about"
    },
    {
      "id": "B03",
      "heading": "I. A violation within a business and crime as its purpose"
    },
    {
      "id": "B04",
      "heading": "II. Outward normality cannot answer for an activity's contents"
    },
    {
      "id": "B05",
      "heading": "III. Job title, action and knowledge are different questions"
    },
    {
      "id": "B06",
      "heading": "IV. A guard, driver or assistant whose work gradually changes"
    },
    {
      "id": "B07",
      "heading": "V. Mixed operations and work alongside the drug trade"
    },
    {
      "id": "B08",
      "heading": "VI. Wages, dependency and coercion are different explanations"
    },
    {
      "id": "B09",
      "heading": "VII. Corporate and individual responsibility differ"
    },
    {
      "id": "B10",
      "heading": "VIII. Understanding participation does not require investigating everything alone"
    },
    {
      "id": "B11",
      "heading": "IX. Loyalty to work and obedience to every instruction"
    },
    {
      "id": "B12",
      "heading": "X. A particular next position rather than one collective role"
    },
    {
      "id": "B13",
      "heading": "What this means in practice"
    },
    {
      "id": "B14",
      "heading": "Key quotation"
    },
    {
      "id": "B15",
      "heading": "Connections between traditions"
    },
    {
      "id": "B16",
      "heading": "Primary texts and sources"
    },
    {
      "id": "B17",
      "heading": "Tags"
    },
    {
      "id": "B18",
      "heading": "About the authors"
    }
  ],
  "machine_content": {
    "summary": [
      {
        "text": "A business's character does not exhaust an employee's position. A violation within activity, crime as its purpose and mixed operations need distinguishing; title, action and knowledge at a particular time are also distinct. An organisational assessment cannot automatically become the same answer for every worker.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B12",
            "quote": "A business's character matters without exhausting an employee's position."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B13",
            "quote": "Distinguish a violation within activity, a criminal result as its purpose and mixed operations."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "What someone did, what they knew then and what authority they had need distinguishing."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "An organisational assessment therefore should not automatically become the same answer for every employee."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "A title says less than an instruction's contents."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "The limited point is that organisational sanctions cannot answer for every employee, while using a company does not erase individual acts."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "topics": [
      {
        "text": "A violation's function within activity",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B03",
            "quote": "But examining that violation differs from examining a supposed service designed to produce a criminal result."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B03",
            "quote": "The distinction concerns a practice's function rather than an attractive signboard."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Outward normality and instruction contents",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "An office, uniform, employment contract and regular wages explain some aspects of work."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "They cannot establish every instruction's lawfulness."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Changing guards', drivers' and assistants' tasks",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "A guard might be asked to move from protecting property to preventing a particular person leaving."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "A driver's journey might be presented as ordinary service before requirements depart from the initial job."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "An assistant might be asked to confirm a fact they never observed."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Mixed operations and work alongside the drug trade",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "In a mixed business, real services may coexist with unlawful activity."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Work and income alongside the drug trade form a distinct context."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Wages, dependency, coercion and different subjects of responsibility",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Receiving wages does not make coercion impossible; missing wages cannot automatically establish a criminal business."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Economic dependency, particular threats and participation's contents need distinguishing."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "A legal entity and an individual are different subjects."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "claims": [
      {
        "text": "A violation within activity differs from crime as its purpose through the practice's function.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B03",
            "quote": "But examining that violation differs from examining a supposed service designed to produce a criminal result."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B03",
            "quote": "The distinction concerns a practice's function rather than an attractive signboard."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "These are analytical distinctions rather than completed legal classifications.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B03",
                "quote": "These are analytical distinctions, not ready-made legal classifications."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "An office, uniform, contract and regular wages cannot establish every instruction's lawfulness.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "An office, uniform, employment contract and regular wages explain some aspects of work."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "They cannot establish every instruction's lawfulness."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S3"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "A small new firm or imperfect administration also establishes no criminal scheme.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B04",
                "quote": "Equally, its absence proves no crime: a small new firm or imperfect administration is not an established criminal scheme."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Job title, act, knowledge then and powers need distinguishing.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "A title says less than an instruction's contents."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "What someone did, what they knew then and what authority they had need distinguishing."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "These questions provide no ready-made legal test or automatic minor-role exoneration.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B05",
                "quote": "These questions are not a ready-made legal test; their relevance needs case-specific assessment."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B05",
                "quote": "They grant neither automatic exoneration through a minor role nor grounds to accuse everyone whose work benefits an organisation."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Alongside the drug trade, proximity, ordinary service, knowledge and participation are not one position.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Work and income alongside the drug trade form a distinct context."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Proximity, ordinary service, knowledge of others' activity and particular participation are not one position."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "An ordinary occupation grants no immunity; substance status, authorisation and national offences remain undetermined.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B07",
                "quote": "An ordinary occupation nevertheless grants no personal immunity."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B07",
                "quote": "This article determines no substance's status, authorisation or offence in a particular country."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "A company and an individual are different subjects; outcomes cannot simply be transferred between these levels.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "A legal entity and an individual are different subjects."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Outcomes cannot simply be transferred between these levels."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S3"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Neither treaty applicability nor a reader's position is established.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B09",
                "quote": "This establishes neither treaty applicability nor a reader's position."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "limitations": [
      {
        "text": "Hypothetical scenes; no legal classification of an organisation, personal guilt, immunity or safe way to resign established. No absolute confidentiality, protected-report status or general right to refuse every official question established. No private company investigation, others' access or dangerous test recommended. Immediate danger gives urgent assistance priority.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B02",
            "quote": "All scenes are hypothetical."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B02",
            "quote": "This article gives no legal classification of an organisation. It determines no personal guilt, immunity or safe way to resign."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B10",
            "quote": "The article establishes neither absolute confidentiality nor protected-report status nor a general right to refuse every official question."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B10",
            "quote": "It need not require evidence against an entire organisation."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B10",
            "quote": "Others' access, unauthorised data removal and dangerous tests of a criminal plan are not recommended here."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B13",
            "quote": "Immediate danger gives appropriate urgent local assistance priority."
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "machine_schema_local_validation": "PASS",
  "evidence_policy": "semantic-explicit-v2",
  "production_compatibility": "NOT_RUN",
  "server_auto_acceptance": "NOT_RUN",
  "publication": "NOT_RUN"
}
