{
  "schema_version": "uw.editorial_geo.v1",
  "article_index": "SYS-184",
  "catalog_id": "SYS-184",
  "language": "en",
  "revision": "systems-20261020.1",
  "revision_scope": "local_editorial_only",
  "headline": "Nominee director, signatory and scapegoat: authority, knowledge and personal responsibility",
  "master_filename": "ARTICLE_EN.md",
  "master_sha256": "64dcd870d99aa58c8725a688b43f478072d89a7453582878bbca7dd3722a8fa8",
  "short_answer": "Formal role, powers, practical influence and benefit need distinction; nominal is neither a ready sentence nor release. Company, document and transaction knowledge, and particular signatory acts, differ. Another person's promise transfers no responsibility automatically. Pressure and possible participation need consideration together; scapegoat is no completed legal finding. Changed records, influence and legal outcomes differ.",
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "C01",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Formal role, powers and practical influence do not automatically coincide; nominee directors, shareholders and individual signatories are not one role.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S1"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Role, powers and practical influence"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B04",
          "quote": "Formal role, actual powers and practical influence do not automatically coincide."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B04",
          "quote": "Nominee directors, nominee shareholders and people signing one document do not become one role because they acted at someone else's request."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "FATF recognizes legitimate purposes for some nominee arrangements; its transparency framework decides no appointment legality and identifies no beneficial owner by impressions.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B04",
              "quote": "FATF's 2023 guidance distinguishes a nominee from the party directing them and expressly recognizes legitimate purposes for some nominee arrangements."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B04",
              "quote": "This is an international transparency framework, not a ruling on an appointment's legality."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B04",
              "quote": "No beneficial owner is identified here from impressions about a person's confidence, wealth or influence in a conversation."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "FATF recognizes legitimate purposes for some nominee arrangements; its transparency framework decides no appointment legality and identifies no beneficial owner by impressions."
    },
    {
      "id": "C02",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Company, document and transaction knowledge differ; ignorance is no universal protection and title cannot establish knowledge of everything.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. What was known and what was inaccessible"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B05",
          "quote": "Knowing a company's name, knowing a document's content and understanding a transaction are different levels."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B05",
          "quote": "Ignorance is no universal protection; assuming a title establishes knowledge of everything is equally insufficient."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Legal effects of missing information, inaccessibility, unclarified questions and intentional avoidance unestablished; understanding role permits no access bypass.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B05",
              "quote": "Missing information, inability to access it, an unclarified question and an intention not to know also differ. Their legal consequences are not determined here."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B05",
              "quote": "Understanding one's role permits no access bypass, another person's credentials or removal of work materials."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Legal effects of missing information, inaccessibility, unclarified questions and intentional avoidance unestablished; understanding role permits no access bypass."
    },
    {
      "id": "C03",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Receipt, forwarding, acknowledging receipt, endorsement and decision differ; name, authentic signature and consent are distinct.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. What a signature confirms"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B06",
          "quote": "Receiving, forwarding, acknowledging receipt, endorsing content and deciding are distinct acts."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B06",
          "quote": "A visible name, authentic signature and consent are also distinct."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "No guaranteed consequence-free signing; possible pressure, data misuse and different purpose cannot establish themselves.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B06",
              "quote": "No method of signing with guaranteed absence of consequences is supplied."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B06",
              "quote": "Data might have been used without knowledge, signing might have occurred under pressure, or the explained purpose might differ from the actual one. These possibilities cannot establish themselves, however."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "No guaranteed consequence-free signing; possible pressure, data misuse and different purpose cannot establish themselves."
    },
    {
      "id": "C04",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Another person's promise establishes no automatic responsibility transfer; help, expenses and reimbursement do not determine each participant's duties.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S2"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "V. Someone else's promise and personal duties"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B07",
          "quote": "Another person's promise establishes no automatic responsibility transfer. Arrangements for assistance, expenses or reimbursement are not determinations of each participant's duties and consequences."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Agreement validity unassessed; OECD board reference establishes no particular director immunity or universal signatory rule.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B07",
              "quote": "No particular agreement's validity is assessed here."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B07",
              "quote": "This corporate-governance reference establishes no immunity for a particular director and supplies no universal rule for signatories."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Agreement validity unassessed; OECD board reference establishes no particular director immunity or universal signatory rule."
    },
    {
      "id": "C05",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Pressure and possible participation do not automatically exclude each other; considering acts should not erase threats, deception or restricted options.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. Pressure and possible participation"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B08",
          "quote": "Pressure and possible participation nevertheless do not automatically exclude each other. Considering conditions need not erase a person's act; considering the act should not erase threats, deception or restricted options."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Coercion label determines no legal protection; help need not wait for proof of complete innocence.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B08",
              "quote": "The word coercion determines no legal protection here. A person need not first prove complete innocence to receive help and careful attention to present circumstances."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Coercion label determines no legal protection; help need not wait for proof of complete innocence."
    },
    {
      "id": "C06",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Scapegoat describes experience or alleged blame transfer, not a legal finding; the word cannot establish every allegation false.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. When someone becomes the scapegoat"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B09",
          "quote": "Scapegoat describes an experience or alleged transfer of blame; it is no completed legal finding."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B09",
          "quote": "But describing oneself as scapegoat cannot establish every allegation false."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Management allegations, internal findings, authority referral and legal outcomes differ; defending oneself gives no universal distribution right over others' information.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B09",
              "quote": "Management allegations, an organization's internal finding, referral to an authority and a legal outcome are different states."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B09",
              "quote": "Others' information still matters: defending oneself establishes no universal right to distribute it."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Management allegations, internal findings, authority referral and legal outcomes differ; defending oneself gives no universal distribution right over others' information."
    },
    {
      "id": "C07",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Changed records, practical influence and legal outcomes differ; ending part of a role cannot rewrite the past or establish all earlier duties ended.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IX. Changed records and the end of a role"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B11",
          "quote": "Changed records, changed practical influence and a legal outcome do not automatically coincide. A role genuinely ended in a particular respect has significance. It cannot rewrite the past or establish that all earlier duties disappeared."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Real role termination matters; a remaining question creates no lifelong obedience, and no universal expiry period is supplied.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B11",
              "quote": "A role genuinely ended in a particular respect has significance."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B11",
              "quote": "Conversely, a remaining question creates no lifelong obedience to the former requester."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B11",
              "quote": "No technical registration procedure or universal expiry period is provided here."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Real role termination matters; a remaining question creates no lifelong obedience, and no universal expiry period is supplied."
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "id": "F01",
      "q": "Does a title mean the person controlled everything?",
      "a": "No automatic correspondence. Role, powers and influence differ; nominee directors, shareholders and individual signatories are distinct. FATF decides no particular appointment legality.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C01"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Role, powers and practical influence"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F02",
      "q": "Does ignorance mean automatic protection?",
      "a": "No universal ignorance protection; title also cannot establish knowledge of everything. Missing information, inaccessibility and intentional avoidance need consideration without a ready legal result.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C02"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. What was known and what was inaccessible"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F03",
      "q": "Are name, signature and consent identical?",
      "a": "No. Receipt, forwarding, endorsement and decision differ; possible data misuse or pressure cannot establish themselves. No consequence-free signature is offered.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C03"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. What a signature confirms"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F04",
      "q": "Does another person's promise transfer responsibility?",
      "a": "Not automatically. Help or reimbursement cannot determine each person's duties. No agreement is assessed; OECD principles establish no immunity here.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C04"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S2"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "V. Someone else's promise and personal duties"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F05",
      "q": "Does removal from a record end everything?",
      "a": "No such general outcome is established. Records, practical influence and legal determination differ; actual role termination matters without establishing all earlier duties ended.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C07"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IX. Changed records and the end of a role"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "S1",
      "author": "FATF",
      "title": "Guidance on Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons, March2023",
      "url": "https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.pdf.coredownload.pdf",
      "read_scope": "Metadata0–17/TOC18–74; selected124–128/Box8 1784–1826,140–142 and context1961–2010; not64pages",
      "rights_status": "COPYRIGHT_FATF_OECD_2023; REPRODUCTION_TRANSLATION_PERMISSION_REQUIRED",
      "role": "Brief nominee/nominator, legitimate arrangements/misuse distinction; no operational concealment method or local finding",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S2",
      "author": "OECD",
      "title": "G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance2023,V.A",
      "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/g20-oecd-principles-of-corporate-governance-2023_ed750b30-en/full-report/component-8.html",
      "read_scope": "SelectedV.A/commentary/V.A.1 3846–3855 read; not chapter. Article briefV.A reference; safeharbour not established",
      "rights_status": "OECD_COPYRIGHT_2023; OTHER_TERMS_UNKNOWN",
      "role": "Board informed good-faith care; not universal signatory rule or personal immunity",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S3",
      "author": "Aristotle; W.D.Ross",
      "title": "Nicomachean EthicsIII.1",
      "url": "https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.3.iii.html",
      "read_scope": "Metadata18–24; complete selectedIII.1 26–51; beginningIII.2 52–57 displayed but unused; not bookIII",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN",
      "role": "Short7word key quote, circumstances/pressure/knowledge; severe historical judgments not self-sacrifice requirement",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S4",
      "author": "Ezekiel; KJV",
      "title": "Ezekiel18:20",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+18%3A20&version=KJV",
      "read_scope": "Complete verse49; version57/rights59; not chapter",
      "rights_status": "PAGE_MARKED_PUBLIC_DOMAIN; WORLDWIDE_NOT_ASSESSED",
      "role": "Short11word epigraph fragment; no transferred guilt, deserved-suffering explanation or contemporary punishment",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    }
  ],
  "retrieval_limits": [
    "Hypothetical scenes: signature authenticity, guilt, beneficial ownership, applicable law and protected disclosure unestablished. International materials replace no local advice. No concealment, consequence-free signing, access bypass, deletion, false dates, coordinated accounts or provocation; safe refusal, secrecy and favourable outcomes not promised. Immediate danger gives urgent help priority. Moral comparisons are not used here to require self-sacrifice or decide legal liability."
  ],
  "article_blocks": [
    {
      "id": "B01",
      "heading": "Epigraph"
    },
    {
      "id": "B02",
      "heading": "What this article is about"
    },
    {
      "id": "B03",
      "heading": "I. Only a name: for which particular task?"
    },
    {
      "id": "B04",
      "heading": "II. Role, powers and practical influence"
    },
    {
      "id": "B05",
      "heading": "III. What was known and what was inaccessible"
    },
    {
      "id": "B06",
      "heading": "IV. What a signature confirms"
    },
    {
      "id": "B07",
      "heading": "V. Someone else's promise and personal duties"
    },
    {
      "id": "B08",
      "heading": "VI. Pressure and possible participation"
    },
    {
      "id": "B09",
      "heading": "VII. When someone becomes the scapegoat"
    },
    {
      "id": "B10",
      "heading": "VIII. Then, later and the new request"
    },
    {
      "id": "B11",
      "heading": "IX. Changed records and the end of a role"
    },
    {
      "id": "B12",
      "heading": "X. Personal responsibility without transferred guilt"
    },
    {
      "id": "B13",
      "heading": "What this means in practice"
    },
    {
      "id": "B14",
      "heading": "Key quotation"
    },
    {
      "id": "B15",
      "heading": "Connections between traditions"
    },
    {
      "id": "B16",
      "heading": "Primary texts and sources"
    },
    {
      "id": "B17",
      "heading": "Tags"
    },
    {
      "id": "B18",
      "heading": "About the authors"
    }
  ],
  "machine_content": {
    "summary": [
      {
        "text": "Formal role, powers, practical influence and benefit need distinction; nominal is neither a ready sentence nor release. Company, document and transaction knowledge, and particular signatory acts, differ. Another person's promise transfers no responsibility automatically. Pressure and possible participation need consideration together; scapegoat is no completed legal finding. Changed records, influence and legal outcomes differ.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B13",
            "quote": "Separate formal role, powers, practical influence and benefit. Nominee arrangements are not declared inherently criminal; a title supplies no automatic release from duties."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Knowing a company's name, knowing a document's content and understanding a transaction are different levels."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "Receiving, forwarding, acknowledging receipt, endorsing content and deciding are distinct acts."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Another person's promise establishes no automatic responsibility transfer."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Pressure and possible participation nevertheless do not automatically exclude each other."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Scapegoat describes an experience or alleged transfer of blame; it is no completed legal finding."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B11",
            "quote": "Changed records, changed practical influence and a legal outcome do not automatically coincide."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "topics": [
      {
        "text": "Formal role, powers and practical influence",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "Formal role, actual powers and practical influence do not automatically coincide."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Nominee directors, nominee shareholders and individual signatories",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "Nominee directors, nominee shareholders and people signing one document do not become one role because they acted at someone else's request."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Knowledge, inaccessible information and intentional avoidance",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Missing information, inability to access it, an unclarified question and an intention not to know also differ."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Receipt, endorsement, signatures and consent",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "Receiving, forwarding, acknowledging receipt, endorsing content and deciding are distinct acts."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "A visible name, authentic signature and consent are also distinct."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Promises, expenses, reimbursement and personal duties",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Another person's promise establishes no automatic responsibility transfer. Arrangements for assistance, expenses or reimbursement are not determinations of each participant's duties and consequences."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Pressure and possible participation together",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Pressure and possible participation nevertheless do not automatically exclude each other."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Scapegoating, allegations and legal outcomes",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Scapegoat describes an experience or alleged transfer of blame; it is no completed legal finding."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Management allegations, an organization's internal finding, referral to an authority and a legal outcome are different states."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Changed records, influence and ending duties",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B11",
            "quote": "Changed records, changed practical influence and a legal outcome do not automatically coincide."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B11",
            "quote": "A role genuinely ended in a particular respect has significance. It cannot rewrite the past or establish that all earlier duties disappeared."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "claims": [
      {
        "text": "Formal role, powers and practical influence do not automatically coincide; nominee directors, shareholders and individual signatories are not one role.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "Formal role, actual powers and practical influence do not automatically coincide."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "Nominee directors, nominee shareholders and people signing one document do not become one role because they acted at someone else's request."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S1"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "FATF recognizes legitimate purposes for some nominee arrangements; its transparency framework decides no appointment legality and identifies no beneficial owner by impressions.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B04",
                "quote": "FATF's 2023 guidance distinguishes a nominee from the party directing them and expressly recognizes legitimate purposes for some nominee arrangements."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B04",
                "quote": "This is an international transparency framework, not a ruling on an appointment's legality."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B04",
                "quote": "No beneficial owner is identified here from impressions about a person's confidence, wealth or influence in a conversation."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Company, document and transaction knowledge differ; ignorance is no universal protection and title cannot establish knowledge of everything.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Knowing a company's name, knowing a document's content and understanding a transaction are different levels."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Ignorance is no universal protection; assuming a title establishes knowledge of everything is equally insufficient."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Legal effects of missing information, inaccessibility, unclarified questions and intentional avoidance unestablished; understanding role permits no access bypass.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B05",
                "quote": "Missing information, inability to access it, an unclarified question and an intention not to know also differ. Their legal consequences are not determined here."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B05",
                "quote": "Understanding one's role permits no access bypass, another person's credentials or removal of work materials."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Receipt, forwarding, acknowledging receipt, endorsement and decision differ; name, authentic signature and consent are distinct.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "Receiving, forwarding, acknowledging receipt, endorsing content and deciding are distinct acts."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "A visible name, authentic signature and consent are also distinct."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No guaranteed consequence-free signing; possible pressure, data misuse and different purpose cannot establish themselves.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B06",
                "quote": "No method of signing with guaranteed absence of consequences is supplied."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B06",
                "quote": "Data might have been used without knowledge, signing might have occurred under pressure, or the explained purpose might differ from the actual one. These possibilities cannot establish themselves, however."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Another person's promise establishes no automatic responsibility transfer; help, expenses and reimbursement do not determine each participant's duties.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Another person's promise establishes no automatic responsibility transfer. Arrangements for assistance, expenses or reimbursement are not determinations of each participant's duties and consequences."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S2"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Agreement validity unassessed; OECD board reference establishes no particular director immunity or universal signatory rule.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B07",
                "quote": "No particular agreement's validity is assessed here."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B07",
                "quote": "This corporate-governance reference establishes no immunity for a particular director and supplies no universal rule for signatories."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Pressure and possible participation do not automatically exclude each other; considering acts should not erase threats, deception or restricted options.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Pressure and possible participation nevertheless do not automatically exclude each other. Considering conditions need not erase a person's act; considering the act should not erase threats, deception or restricted options."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Coercion label determines no legal protection; help need not wait for proof of complete innocence.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B08",
                "quote": "The word coercion determines no legal protection here. A person need not first prove complete innocence to receive help and careful attention to present circumstances."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Scapegoat describes experience or alleged blame transfer, not a legal finding; the word cannot establish every allegation false.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Scapegoat describes an experience or alleged transfer of blame; it is no completed legal finding."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "But describing oneself as scapegoat cannot establish every allegation false."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Management allegations, internal findings, authority referral and legal outcomes differ; defending oneself gives no universal distribution right over others' information.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B09",
                "quote": "Management allegations, an organization's internal finding, referral to an authority and a legal outcome are different states."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B09",
                "quote": "Others' information still matters: defending oneself establishes no universal right to distribute it."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Changed records, practical influence and legal outcomes differ; ending part of a role cannot rewrite the past or establish all earlier duties ended.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B11",
            "quote": "Changed records, changed practical influence and a legal outcome do not automatically coincide. A role genuinely ended in a particular respect has significance. It cannot rewrite the past or establish that all earlier duties disappeared."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Real role termination matters; a remaining question creates no lifelong obedience, and no universal expiry period is supplied.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B11",
                "quote": "A role genuinely ended in a particular respect has significance."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B11",
                "quote": "Conversely, a remaining question creates no lifelong obedience to the former requester."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B11",
                "quote": "No technical registration procedure or universal expiry period is provided here."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "limitations": [
      {
        "text": "Hypothetical scenes: signature authenticity, guilt, beneficial ownership, applicable law and protected disclosure unestablished. International materials replace no local advice. No concealment, consequence-free signing, access bypass, deletion, false dates, coordinated accounts or provocation; safe refusal, secrecy and favourable outcomes not promised. Immediate danger gives urgent help priority. Moral comparisons are not used here to require self-sacrifice or decide legal liability.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B02",
            "quote": "All scenes are hypothetical. Signature authenticity, guilt, particular beneficial ownership, applicable law and protected disclosure are unestablished. International materials cannot replace suitable local advice. No methods of concealing control or consequence-free signing are offered."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Understanding one's role permits no access bypass, another person's credentials or removal of work materials."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B10",
            "quote": "Do not delete information, falsify dates, coordinate a convenient account or conceal practical control."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B13",
            "quote": "Do not test promises through trial involvement, provoke confession, delete information or coordinate convenient accounts. Safe refusal, absolute secrecy and favourable outcomes are not promised."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B02",
            "quote": "Immediate danger to life and safety gives appropriate urgent local help priority over reading and preparing explanations."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B12",
            "quote": "In Nicomachean Ethics III.1, Aristotle considers action, compulsion, ignorance and differences between particular circumstances.[3] This historical account is no contemporary guilt test. Its severe judgments create no demand here to endure threats at any cost or sacrifice life."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B12",
            "quote": "Ezekiel 18:20 resists transferring one person's guilt to another.[4] Religious framing and philosophical analysis have different grounds; the comparison is editorial. Neither determines director or signature liability or explains suffering as deserved."
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "machine_schema_local_validation": "PASS",
  "evidence_policy": "semantic-explicit-v2",
  "production_compatibility": "NOT_RUN",
  "server_auto_acceptance": "NOT_RUN",
  "publication": "NOT_RUN"
}