{
  "schema_version": "uw.editorial_geo.v1",
  "article_index": "SYS-186",
  "catalog_id": "SYS-186",
  "language": "en",
  "revision": "systems-20261020.1",
  "revision_scope": "local_editorial_only",
  "headline": "Using someone else's account, identity or access: an offer to just help",
  "master_filename": "ARTICLE_EN.md",
  "master_sha256": "82a70f5c7006d132e4dc0d0b6051d4bd12b0f1e5e42d76c4478395d62be87f78",
  "short_answer": "Providing your account/access and using another's differ. Owner consent, technical capability and authority differ. A document copy is no general consent; successful login alone cannot establish legality or owner awareness. Another person's promise transfers no responsibility automatically. Deception, pressure and possible participation are considered together; ended access, corrected records, restored control and legal outcomes differ.",
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "C01",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Providing your account/access and using another's differ; account holder, sender, recipient and person directing need not coincide.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S1"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. What must be supplied or done?",
        "II. Your account for someone else's purpose"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B03",
          "quote": "Providing your account for another's acts and using someone else's account are different positions. Handing over your access and receiving another's are distinct too."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B04",
          "quote": "Account holder, sender, recipient and person issuing instructions need not coincide."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Difference alone establishes no crime; Europol concerns a particular scheme, not every family/joint/representative arrangement, and consequences cannot be transplanted to everyone.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B04",
              "quote": "Account holder, sender, recipient and person issuing instructions need not coincide. Difference alone establishes no crime: lawful relationships and business grounds exist."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B04",
              "quote": "Europol's leaflet describes paid use of an account for others' money movements presented as risk-free earnings, and warns of possible threats.[1] This concerns a particular scheme, not every relative's assistance, joint account or representation. Stated consequences cannot be transplanted mechanically to each country or person."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Difference alone establishes no crime; Europol concerns a particular scheme, not every family/joint/representative arrangement, and consequences cannot be transplanted to everyone."
    },
    {
      "id": "C02",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Owner consent, technical capability and proper authority differ; particular permission does not automatically expand to every later act.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Acting through another person's account"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B05",
          "quote": "Owner consent, technical capability and proper authority differ. Authentic permission for particular help should not automatically expand to every later act."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Service rules/law unestablished here; lawful forms of help remain possible and suspicion establishes no deception.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B05",
              "quote": "Service rules and applicable law may impose conditions of their own; their content for a particular person is undetermined here."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B05",
              "quote": "Assistance for someone struggling with a service may have lawful forms; they are not declared impossible."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B05",
              "quote": "Suspicion cannot establish deception either."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Service rules/law unestablished here; lawful forms of help remain possible and suspicion establishes no deception."
    },
    {
      "id": "C03",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Identity information, documents, roles and confirmation differ; copies are no general consent and a name cannot establish informed participation in every act.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. Identity is not a document copy"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B06",
          "quote": "Providing identity information, showing a document, accepting a role and confirming an act differ. A document copy is no general consent to everything done under a person's name."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B06",
          "quote": "A name in an account or document cannot establish informed participation in every act."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Unknowing use, incomplete explanation, limited consent and pressure are possibilities, not established themselves; copy provision gets no universal classification.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B06",
              "quote": "Data may have been used without knowledge, explanations may be incomplete, consent limited or participation pressured. These possibilities cannot establish themselves."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B06",
              "quote": "Possession or provision of a copy receives no universal legal classification here either."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Unknowing use, incomplete explanation, limited consent and pressure are possibilities, not established themselves; copy provision gets no universal classification."
    },
    {
      "id": "C04",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Authenticator, account control and lawfulness differ; successful login alone does not establish proper authority, legality or owner awareness.",
      "source_ids": [
        "S2"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "V. A successful login answers which question?"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B07",
          "quote": "An authenticator, account control and the lawfulness of a particular act differ."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B07",
          "quote": "Successful login alone cannot establish proper authority, operation legality or the owner's awareness of purpose."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "NIST is technical framing, not banking law/consent finding; technical failure alone cannot prove unlawful intent, and official help is not a guarantee of instant recovery or legal completion.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B07",
              "quote": "NIST 2025's introduction describes authentication through control of means associated with an account and notes limits where secrets are deliberately shared.[2] This is technical framing, not banking law or a decision on Ilya's consent."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B07",
              "quote": "A technical failure likewise cannot prove unlawful intent by someone seeking ordinary help."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B07",
              "quote": "Where access is used without consent, appropriate official bank or service help may matter; it is no promise of instant recovery or legal completion."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "NIST is technical framing, not banking law/consent finding; technical failure alone cannot prove unlawful intent, and official help is not a guarantee of instant recovery or legal completion."
    },
    {
      "id": "C05",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Trust differs from unlimited means; promises do not transfer responsibility automatically, payment alone does not determine the nature of participation, while no payment does not establish absence of one's own role.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. Trust while retaining your own role"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B08",
          "quote": "Trusting someone differs from providing every means to act in one's name."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B08",
          "quote": "A promise to take every consequence establishes no automatic responsibility transfer."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B08",
          "quote": "Payment cannot automatically classify participation. Small rewards do not make an act harmless; no payment does not establish absence of one's own role."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "No agreement validity assessed; a promise can matter without becoming release, and income is not inherently suspect.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B08",
              "quote": "No particular agreement's validity is assessed here."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B08",
              "quote": "The promise may nevertheless matter to the relationship and the person's understanding. It should neither disappear from history nor become completed release."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B08",
              "quote": "This article treats neither earnings as inherently suspect nor money as a measure of virtue."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "No agreement validity assessed; a promise can matter without becoming release, and income is not inherently suspect."
    },
    {
      "id": "C06",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Deception, pressure and possible participation need consideration together; support need not wait for complete innocence, and then/later/new requests differ.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. Deception, pressure and possible participation"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B09",
          "quote": "Deception, pressure and possible participation need distinct and connected attention."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B09",
          "quote": "Complete innocence need not be proved before help with threats and present circumstances becomes available."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B09",
          "quote": "Distinguish conduct then, knowledge later and the request now."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Particular coercion protection unestablished; safe refusal/secrecy/every-disclosure protection not promised; genuine correction remains possible.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B09",
              "quote": "This article establishes no coercion-based legal protection in a particular case."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B09",
              "quote": "Safe refusal, absolute secrecy and protection for every disclosure are not promised."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B09",
              "quote": "Genuine correction nevertheless remains possible; a broken earlier promise need not prove every future correction impossible."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Particular coercion protection unestablished; safe refusal/secrecy/every-disclosure protection not promised; genuine correction remains possible."
    },
    {
      "id": "C07",
      "type": "bounded_editorial_interpretation",
      "text": "Report receipt is not restored control or legal determination; ending access, corrected records, restored control and legal outcomes differ.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. If an act already occurred",
        "IX. Ending access and obtaining a result"
      ],
      "evidence": [
        {
          "block_id": "B10",
          "quote": "Confirmed receipt of a report is not restored control; restored control is no legal finding about earlier acts."
        },
        {
          "block_id": "B11",
          "quote": "Ending access, correcting records, restoring control and legal outcomes do not automatically coincide."
        }
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        {
          "text": "Actual cessation matters without rewriting the past or establishing every duty/consequence gone; remaining questions create no lifelong obedience.",
          "evidence": [
            {
              "block_id": "B11",
              "quote": "Actual cessation matters without rewriting the past or establishing every duty and consequence gone."
            },
            {
              "block_id": "B11",
              "quote": "Conversely, a remaining question creates no lifelong obedience to the former requester or new helper."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "limitations": "Actual cessation matters without rewriting the past or establishing every duty/consequence gone; remaining questions create no lifelong obedience."
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "id": "F01",
      "q": "Are providing your account and using another's one role?",
      "a": "No. These directions and handing over/receiving access differ. Holder, sender, recipient and person issuing instructions may differ without an established crime.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C01"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S1"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. What must be supplied or done?",
        "II. Your account for someone else's purpose"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F02",
      "q": "Does owner permission establish authority?",
      "a": "Not automatically. Consent, technical capability and authority differ; particular permission does not cover every later act. Lawful help remains possible; local rules are undetermined here.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C02"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Acting through another person's account"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F03",
      "q": "Do document copies or names confirm every act?",
      "a": "No. A document copy is no general consent and a name does not establish informed participation in every step. Possible deception, limited consent or pressure cannot establish themselves.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C03"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. Identity is not a document copy"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F04",
      "q": "Does successful login establish legality?",
      "a": "No automatic result follows. Technical login alone cannot establish authority, legality or owner awareness. NIST is not local banking law; seeking official service help does not itself establish instant recovery.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C04"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S2"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "V. A successful login answers which question?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "F05",
      "q": "Does ended access or report receipt settle everything?",
      "a": "No general automatic outcome. Receipt, access, records, control and legal determination differ. Actual cessation matters without establishing every duty ended.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C07"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. If an act already occurred",
        "IX. Ending access and obtaining a result"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "S1",
      "author": "Europol",
      "title": "Don't be a Mule!, leaflet for people experiencing economic hardship",
      "url": "https://www.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/emma_flyer_people_ec_hardship.pdf",
      "read_scope": "Complete2pageleaflet0–44 read; mainwebpage JSloader/bodyUNAVAILABLE. No90percent statistic or universal consequence transplant",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN",
      "role": "Brief account-use paid-riskfree offer/threat warning, no verdict on every family/joint/representative arrangement",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S2",
      "author": "NIST",
      "title": "SP800-63B-4: Authentication and Authenticator Management,2025,Introduction",
      "url": "https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b/introduction/",
      "read_scope": "Complete informativeIntroduction0–41; brief use4/6/10. CSRCmetadata68/70 confirmsJuly2025/supersedes2020; not fullstandard or otherparts",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN",
      "role": "Technical authenticator-control scope and voluntary-sharing limit; no local banking right or personal consent determination",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S3",
      "author": "Dhammapada; F.MaxMüller",
      "title": "Dhammapada XII.166",
      "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/2017/pg2017-images.html",
      "read_scope": "Complete166348 and chapterXII157–166331–348 read; notbook. Ebook2017/translator/USPD metadata reusedSYS182",
      "rights_status": "US_PUBLIC_DOMAIN; WORLDWIDE_NOT_ASSESSED",
      "role": "Short8word epigraph; spiritual practice not bank/employmentduty, no indifference or blame for deception",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    },
    {
      "id": "S4",
      "author": "Matthew; KJV",
      "title": "Matthew5:37 and5:33–37",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+5%3A33-37&version=KJV",
      "read_scope": "Complete5:33–37 49–56; separate5:37 49/version57/PD59 read; notchapter",
      "rights_status": "PAGE_MARKED_PUBLIC_DOMAIN; WORLDWIDE_NOT_ASSESSED",
      "role": "Short4word keyquotation, oaths/clearword context, no unlimited disclosure or unsafe refusal duty",
      "read_date": "2026-10-20"
    }
  ],
  "retrieval_limits": [
    "Hypothetical scenes; crime, authentic consent, guilt, law and service rules unestablished. Family help, joint accounts and representation are not automatically criminal. No check bypass/identity use/concealed-operation instructions, trial transfers/logins, deletion, false dates or agreed accounts; no guaranteed harmless participation, safe refusal, secrecy or protected disclosure. Immediate danger gives urgent help priority. Moral comparison here is no banking rule, indifference permission, self-sacrifice requirement, unrestricted disclosure or dangerous refusal duty."
  ],
  "article_blocks": [
    {
      "id": "B01",
      "heading": "Epigraph"
    },
    {
      "id": "B02",
      "heading": "What this article is about"
    },
    {
      "id": "B03",
      "heading": "I. What must be supplied or done?"
    },
    {
      "id": "B04",
      "heading": "II. Your account for someone else's purpose"
    },
    {
      "id": "B05",
      "heading": "III. Acting through another person's account"
    },
    {
      "id": "B06",
      "heading": "IV. Identity is not a document copy"
    },
    {
      "id": "B07",
      "heading": "V. A successful login answers which question?"
    },
    {
      "id": "B08",
      "heading": "VI. Trust while retaining your own role"
    },
    {
      "id": "B09",
      "heading": "VII. Deception, pressure and possible participation"
    },
    {
      "id": "B10",
      "heading": "VIII. If an act already occurred"
    },
    {
      "id": "B11",
      "heading": "IX. Ending access and obtaining a result"
    },
    {
      "id": "B12",
      "heading": "X. Helping without disappearing from the act"
    },
    {
      "id": "B13",
      "heading": "What this means in practice"
    },
    {
      "id": "B14",
      "heading": "Key quotation"
    },
    {
      "id": "B15",
      "heading": "Connections between traditions"
    },
    {
      "id": "B16",
      "heading": "Primary texts and sources"
    },
    {
      "id": "B17",
      "heading": "Tags"
    },
    {
      "id": "B18",
      "heading": "About the authors"
    }
  ],
  "machine_content": {
    "summary": [
      {
        "text": "Providing your account/access and using another's differ. Owner consent, technical capability and authority differ. A document copy is no general consent; successful login alone cannot establish legality or owner awareness. Another person's promise transfers no responsibility automatically. Deception, pressure and possible participation are considered together; ended access, corrected records, restored control and legal outcomes differ.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B03",
            "quote": "Providing your account for another's acts and using someone else's account are different positions. Handing over your access and receiving another's are distinct too."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Owner consent, technical capability and proper authority differ."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "A document copy is no general consent to everything done under a person's name."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Successful login alone cannot establish proper authority, operation legality or the owner's awareness of purpose."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "A promise to take every consequence establishes no automatic responsibility transfer."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Deception, pressure and possible participation need distinct and connected attention."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B11",
            "quote": "Ending access, correcting records, restoring control and legal outcomes do not automatically coincide."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "topics": [
      {
        "text": "Providing your account/access and using another's as separate perspectives",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B03",
            "quote": "Providing your account for another's acts and using someone else's account are different positions. Handing over your access and receiving another's are distinct too."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Owner consent, powers and service conditions",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Owner consent, technical capability and proper authority differ."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Service rules and applicable law may impose conditions of their own; their content for a particular person is undetermined here."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Document, name, consent and authorship",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "Providing identity information, showing a document, accepting a role and confirming an act differ. A document copy is no general consent to everything done under a person's name."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "A name in an account or document cannot establish informed participation in every act."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Technical login, account control and lawfulness",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "An authenticator, account control and the lawfulness of a particular act differ."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Successful login alone cannot establish proper authority, operation legality or the owner's awareness of purpose."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Trust, payment, promises and responsibility limits",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Trusting someone differs from providing every means to act in one's name."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "A promise to take every consequence establishes no automatic responsibility transfer."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Payment cannot automatically classify participation. Small rewards do not make an act harmless; no payment does not establish absence of one's own role."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Deception, pressure and possible participation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Deception, pressure and possible participation need distinct and connected attention."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Earlier acts, later knowledge and new requests",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "New requests need their own consideration."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Distinguish conduct then, knowledge later and the request now."
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Receipt, ended access, records, restored control and legal outcomes",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B10",
            "quote": "Confirmed receipt of a report is not restored control; restored control is no legal finding about earlier acts."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B11",
            "quote": "Ending access, correcting records, restoring control and legal outcomes do not automatically coincide."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "claims": [
      {
        "text": "Providing your account/access and using another's differ; account holder, sender, recipient and person directing need not coincide.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B03",
            "quote": "Providing your account for another's acts and using someone else's account are different positions. Handing over your access and receiving another's are distinct too."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B04",
            "quote": "Account holder, sender, recipient and person issuing instructions need not coincide."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S1"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Difference alone establishes no crime; Europol concerns a particular scheme, not every family/joint/representative arrangement, and consequences cannot be transplanted to everyone.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B04",
                "quote": "Account holder, sender, recipient and person issuing instructions need not coincide. Difference alone establishes no crime: lawful relationships and business grounds exist."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B04",
                "quote": "Europol's leaflet describes paid use of an account for others' money movements presented as risk-free earnings, and warns of possible threats.[1] This concerns a particular scheme, not every relative's assistance, joint account or representation. Stated consequences cannot be transplanted mechanically to each country or person."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Owner consent, technical capability and proper authority differ; particular permission does not automatically expand to every later act.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B05",
            "quote": "Owner consent, technical capability and proper authority differ. Authentic permission for particular help should not automatically expand to every later act."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Service rules/law unestablished here; lawful forms of help remain possible and suspicion establishes no deception.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B05",
                "quote": "Service rules and applicable law may impose conditions of their own; their content for a particular person is undetermined here."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B05",
                "quote": "Assistance for someone struggling with a service may have lawful forms; they are not declared impossible."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B05",
                "quote": "Suspicion cannot establish deception either."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Identity information, documents, roles and confirmation differ; copies are no general consent and a name cannot establish informed participation in every act.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "Providing identity information, showing a document, accepting a role and confirming an act differ. A document copy is no general consent to everything done under a person's name."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B06",
            "quote": "A name in an account or document cannot establish informed participation in every act."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Unknowing use, incomplete explanation, limited consent and pressure are possibilities, not established themselves; copy provision gets no universal classification.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B06",
                "quote": "Data may have been used without knowledge, explanations may be incomplete, consent limited or participation pressured. These possibilities cannot establish themselves."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B06",
                "quote": "Possession or provision of a copy receives no universal legal classification here either."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Authenticator, account control and lawfulness differ; successful login alone does not establish proper authority, legality or owner awareness.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "An authenticator, account control and the lawfulness of a particular act differ."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B07",
            "quote": "Successful login alone cannot establish proper authority, operation legality or the owner's awareness of purpose."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S2"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "NIST is technical framing, not banking law/consent finding; technical failure alone cannot prove unlawful intent, and official help is not a guarantee of instant recovery or legal completion.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B07",
                "quote": "NIST 2025's introduction describes authentication through control of means associated with an account and notes limits where secrets are deliberately shared.[2] This is technical framing, not banking law or a decision on Ilya's consent."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B07",
                "quote": "A technical failure likewise cannot prove unlawful intent by someone seeking ordinary help."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B07",
                "quote": "Where access is used without consent, appropriate official bank or service help may matter; it is no promise of instant recovery or legal completion."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Trust differs from unlimited means; promises do not transfer responsibility automatically, payment alone does not determine the nature of participation, while no payment does not establish absence of one's own role.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Trusting someone differs from providing every means to act in one's name."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "A promise to take every consequence establishes no automatic responsibility transfer."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B08",
            "quote": "Payment cannot automatically classify participation. Small rewards do not make an act harmless; no payment does not establish absence of one's own role."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "No agreement validity assessed; a promise can matter without becoming release, and income is not inherently suspect.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B08",
                "quote": "No particular agreement's validity is assessed here."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B08",
                "quote": "The promise may nevertheless matter to the relationship and the person's understanding. It should neither disappear from history nor become completed release."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B08",
                "quote": "This article treats neither earnings as inherently suspect nor money as a measure of virtue."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Deception, pressure and possible participation need consideration together; support need not wait for complete innocence, and then/later/new requests differ.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Deception, pressure and possible participation need distinct and connected attention."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Complete innocence need not be proved before help with threats and present circumstances becomes available."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Distinguish conduct then, knowledge later and the request now."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Particular coercion protection unestablished; safe refusal/secrecy/every-disclosure protection not promised; genuine correction remains possible.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B09",
                "quote": "This article establishes no coercion-based legal protection in a particular case."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B09",
                "quote": "Safe refusal, absolute secrecy and protection for every disclosure are not promised."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B09",
                "quote": "Genuine correction nevertheless remains possible; a broken earlier promise need not prove every future correction impossible."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Report receipt is not restored control or legal determination; ending access, corrected records, restored control and legal outcomes differ.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B10",
            "quote": "Confirmed receipt of a report is not restored control; restored control is no legal finding about earlier acts."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B11",
            "quote": "Ending access, correcting records, restoring control and legal outcomes do not automatically coincide."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Actual cessation matters without rewriting the past or establishing every duty/consequence gone; remaining questions create no lifelong obedience.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "B11",
                "quote": "Actual cessation matters without rewriting the past or establishing every duty and consequence gone."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "B11",
                "quote": "Conversely, a remaining question creates no lifelong obedience to the former requester or new helper."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "limitations": [
      {
        "text": "Hypothetical scenes; crime, authentic consent, guilt, law and service rules unestablished. Family help, joint accounts and representation are not automatically criminal. No check bypass/identity use/concealed-operation instructions, trial transfers/logins, deletion, false dates or agreed accounts; no guaranteed harmless participation, safe refusal, secrecy or protected disclosure. Immediate danger gives urgent help priority. Moral comparison here is no banking rule, indifference permission, self-sacrifice requirement, unrestricted disclosure or dangerous refusal duty.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "B02",
            "quote": "All scenes are hypothetical. Crime, authentic consent, guilt, applicable service rules and law are unestablished. A technical standard and public leaflet cannot replace suitable local consideration. No methods of bypassing checks, using another identity or concealing operations are offered."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B02",
            "quote": "Family assistance, joint accounts and representation are not automatically declared criminal."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B10",
            "quote": "Do not make trial transfers, test another person's login, delete information, falsify dates or coordinate convenient accounts."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B13",
            "quote": "No consequence-free participation method is offered."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B09",
            "quote": "Safe refusal, absolute secrecy and protection for every disclosure are not promised."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B02",
            "quote": "Immediate danger to life and safety gives appropriate urgent local help priority over reading and preparing explanations."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B12",
            "quote": "Dhammapada XII.166 preserves attention to one's own duty alongside another's.[3] Here it is an editorial question about help's boundaries, not a banking rule or permission for indifference. Historical spiritual practice has another subject. It supplies no explanation of deception as deserved harm or demand for self-sacrifice to repair it."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "B12",
            "quote": "Matthew 5:33–37 concerns oaths and clear speech.[4] That context creates no universal duty to answer anyone, disclose others' secrets or make dangerous refusals."
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "machine_schema_local_validation": "PASS",
  "evidence_policy": "semantic-explicit-v2",
  "production_compatibility": "NOT_RUN",
  "server_auto_acceptance": "NOT_RUN",
  "publication": "NOT_RUN"
}