# Accountability for someone people trust

This article concerns delegated powers, explanation recipients, inquiry limits and actual correction. Trust and earlier contributions do not replace questions about actions; inquiry grants no unlimited power either. The new revision adds social organisations, informal influence, donor and member roles. Individual scenes are invented.

It may help organisers, members, volunteers, staff, donors and beneficiaries.

- How does trust differ from an assignment's scope?
- What does a document establish and leave unknown?
- When do donors, members and leaders have different roles?
- How does sending a question differ from consideration, correction and help?

Historical comparisons are neither proven systems nor local law. An actual constitution and individual rights are undetermined. Safe questioning, refusal or departure, retained funding, membership, place, help, relationships, work and income, or a shared favourable outcome are not guaranteed. Actual urgent duties do not await completed inquiries; beneficiary histories are no price of accountability.

<!-- SERVICE_PASSPORT -->
catalog_id: R-25-N02
language: en
revision: 2
article_sha256: ca73ae10a63a0561f119b5c63e0795c5f3ca12aca2a61ae899e1f804d7f69e8a
article: ARTICLE_EN.md
status: AUTHOR_PREPARED_NOT_SERVER_ACCEPTED