{
  "schema_version": "uw-systems-local-geo-v1",
  "catalog_id": "WAR-082",
  "route_id": "SYS-R031",
  "language": "en",
  "revision": 5,
  "revision_status": "LOCAL_PROPOSED_NOT_SERVER_REVISION",
  "headline": "Living through occupation: fear, dependence and relationships",
  "description": "The article considers everyday dependence under external military authority and residents’ different biographies. Curfew and checks, incompatible demands and ordinary procedures returning after emergency rule are added. Protection norms, actual access, trust and legal assessment remain distinct.",
  "master_filename": "ARTICLE_EN.md",
  "master_sha256": "7129b37a8aff016ad17aa078b4f4e913b967970aea48ca7a54719dea2ef474a9",
  "short_answer": "Understanding restrictions requires their current hours, area and conditions; incompatible demands do not make everyday contact proof of choosing a side. Ordinary procedures returning after emergency rule differ from occupation ending; a norm proves neither local implementation nor current forms and deadlines.",
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "C01",
      "text": "Hours, area, date, affected people, exceptions and a current restriction source differ; yesterday’s arrangement establishes no present conditions. Documents, movement and treatment raise different questions; describing an arrangement certifies neither legality nor a safe journey.",
      "status": "interpretation",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. External authority is more than a personal feeling"
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C02",
      "text": "Obtaining medicine, everyday conversation, delivering help and contributing to harm differ; neither contact nor the word help establishes intention, contribution, free consent or legal outcome.",
      "status": "interpretation",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Dependence on necessities is not unlimited agreement"
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C03",
      "text": "Ordinary procedures returning after emergency rule differ from occupation ending; a temporary-derogation norm proves no local implementation, while an open office establishes no current forms, deadlines or appeal arrangements.",
      "status": "interpretation",
      "source_ids": [
        "S6"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "IX. Changed authority does not produce immediate trust"
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C04",
      "text": "Health, money, documents, responsibilities and information access may differ; wanting to protect loved ones creates no identical possibilities, while material dependence does not automatically approve each action.",
      "status": "interpretation",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. One address does not mean one biography"
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "C05",
      "text": "Private discussion, help, legal assessment, reporting and publication have different purposes; consent to one does not itself permit another, while others’ names and experience do not become freely available material.",
      "status": "interpretation",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. Telling has a recipient, conditions and limits"
      ],
      "qualifiers": [
        "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome."
      ]
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "id": "Q01",
      "q": "What needs distinguishing under curfew and checks?",
      "a": "Hours, area, date, affected people, exceptions and a current restriction source differ; yesterday’s arrangement establishes no present conditions. Documents, movement and treatment raise different questions; describing an arrangement certifies neither legality nor a safe journey.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C01"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. External authority is more than a personal feeling"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q02",
      "q": "Does everyday contact mean choosing a side between incompatible demands?",
      "a": "Obtaining medicine, everyday conversation, delivering help and contributing to harm differ; neither contact nor the word help establishes intention, contribution, free consent or legal outcome.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C02"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Dependence on necessities is not unlimited agreement"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q03",
      "q": "Does an open office prove ordinary rules have returned?",
      "a": "Ordinary procedures returning after emergency rule differ from occupation ending; a temporary-derogation norm proves no local implementation, while an open office establishes no current forms, deadlines or appeal arrangements.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C03"
      ],
      "source_ids": [
        "S6"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "IX. Changed authority does not produce immediate trust"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q04",
      "q": "Does one address mean everyone had the same choices?",
      "a": "Health, money, documents, responsibilities and information access may differ; wanting to protect loved ones creates no identical possibilities, while material dependence does not automatically approve each action.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C04"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. One address does not mean one biography"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "Q05",
      "q": "Does a private account permit publication and other people’s names?",
      "a": "Private discussion, help, legal assessment, reporting and publication have different purposes; consent to one does not itself permit another, while others’ names and experience do not become freely available material.",
      "claim_ids": [
        "C05"
      ],
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. Telling has a recipient, conditions and limits"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "S1",
      "title": "ICRC Occupation and international humanitarian law: Questions and answers",
      "url": "https://www.icrc.org/en/article/occupation-international-humanitarian-law-questions",
      "locator": "4Aug2004; all7mainquestions175–234 anddate164–169 fullyreadnow, lastquestion230–234separately. Notfulltreaties/currentindividualclassification.",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN; BRIEF_ATTRIBUTED_PARAPHRASE",
      "read_date": "2026-10-21"
    },
    {
      "id": "S2",
      "title": "Proverbs18:13–17 KJV",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs+18%3A13-17&version=KJV",
      "locator": "All5verses49–56 andKJV/PD62–64 readnow; exact4wordepigraph before he heareth it; notwholechapter/Hebrew.",
      "rights_status": "KJV_PUBLIC_DOMAIN_LABEL_READ; GLOBAL_ASSESSMENT_NOT_RUN",
      "read_date": "2026-10-21"
    },
    {
      "id": "S3",
      "title": "Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics III.1–2, W.D.Ross",
      "url": "https://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.3.iii.html",
      "locator": "OriginalWAR082recordfullIII1–2 retainedhistorically. Newownreadmeta20–21 andIII1context27–50 inclmixedactions, mortalitydemandnotadopted and7wordkey at the time when they are done. No newfullIII1–2read claim.",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN; SHORT_ATTRIBUTED_FRAGMENT",
      "read_date": "2026-10-21"
    },
    {
      "id": "S4",
      "title": "VA Common Reactions After Trauma",
      "url": "https://www.ptsd.va.gov/understand/isitptsd/common_reactions.asp",
      "locator": "Selectedcompleteparas371,376–377,423 plusNotAllReactionsPTSD381 andupdated25Sep2026line520readnow; notwholemainbodynewread. Originalfullread retainedasWAR082history.",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN; BRIEF_ATTRIBUTED_PARAPHRASE",
      "read_date": "2026-10-21"
    },
    {
      "id": "S5",
      "title": "NIMH Help for Mental Illnesses",
      "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/find-help",
      "locator": "Selected18–28urgency,42–58competenthelp and75–78limits/date/rights readnow. ReviewedApril2026. USnumbersnottransferred; noimages.",
      "rights_status": "PUBLIC_DOMAIN_TEXT_NOTICE_EXCEPT_UNLESS_SPECIFIED_AND_IMAGES; NO_GLOBAL_BLANKET",
      "read_date": "2026-10-21"
    },
    {
      "id": "S6",
      "title": "UNHumanRightsCommittee General Comment29 Art4",
      "url": "https://docstore.ohchr.org/SelfServices/FilesHandler.ashx?enc=VRhyH%2Bfv%2BI8YD8fvFEmrEBGNNWCpm%2BDcfk6I5v6uCdBbUI2%2Bswg2EPnyGSpAhcvhwCAZM%2FPPIIEnidtNdNfhFRQFPUJKh0WTBONmJoooPNk%3D",
      "locator": "Adopted24Jul2001/document31Aug2001; officialOHCHRheading0–10andcompleteparas1–4lines11–22read; para5partialnotclaimed. Newcurrentprocedure/fullcommentnotread. Emergencyderogation andoccupationstatusdistinct.",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN; BRIEF_ATTRIBUTED_PARAPHRASE",
      "read_date": "2026-10-21"
    }
  ],
  "retrieval_limits": [
    "This article determines no territory’s, person’s or action’s status, locally safe channels or applicable procedure. A norm proves no actual protection access; confidentiality depends on recipient and rules."
  ],
  "article_blocks": [
    {
      "block_id": "I",
      "section": "I. External authority is more than a personal feeling"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "II",
      "section": "II. Dependence on necessities is not unlimited agreement"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "III",
      "section": "III. Fear calls for distinguishing current threat and condition"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "IV",
      "section": "IV. An action belongs to the circumstances of its time"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "V",
      "section": "V. Suspicion about a neighbour is not an established fact"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "VI",
      "section": "VI. One address does not mean one biography"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "VII",
      "section": "VII. Household agreements should not pass adult danger to children"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "VIII",
      "section": "VIII. Telling has a recipient, conditions and limits"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "IX",
      "section": "IX. Changed authority does not produce immediate trust"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "X",
      "section": "X. Responsibility can acknowledge coercion and injured people"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "XI",
      "section": "XI. Continuing life is larger than compulsory explanation"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "LEAD",
      "section": "What this article is about"
    },
    {
      "block_id": "PRACTICE",
      "section": "What this means in practice"
    }
  ],
  "machine_content": {
    "summary": [
      {
        "text": "Understanding restrictions requires their current hours, area and conditions; incompatible demands do not make everyday contact proof of choosing a side. Ordinary procedures returning after emergency rule differ from occupation ending; a norm proves neither local implementation nor current forms and deadlines.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "I",
            "quote": "An everyday entry is a hypothetical medicine trip under curfew and document checks. Relevant distinctions include current hours, area, date, affected people, exceptions and the restriction notice’s source and currency. Yesterday’s arrangement or retelling establishes no present conditions. Document checks, movement restrictions and treatment access differ. No violation to test a rule, checkpoint evasion or unnecessary disclosure is recommended. Describing an arrangement certifies neither its legality nor a safe available journey."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "II",
            "quote": "Another hypothetical civilian faces an institution demanding information confirmation and an opposing actor demanding all contact stop. Both demands may be impossible to fulfil together. Courage alone does not resolve incompatibility. Obtaining medicine, everyday conversation, delivering help and contributing to harm differ; neither contact nor the word help establishes intention, contribution, free consent or legal outcome. This prescribes neither choosing a side nor transmitting information; actual demands and consequences need suitable competent consideration."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "IX",
            "quote": "After prolonged emergency rule, restoring ordinary procedures is separate from occupation ending. Human Rights Committee General Comment 29, paragraphs 1–2, describes derogations as exceptional and temporary, with restored full Covenant compliance the objective. This norm proves no local implementation. An office reopening confirms no current forms, deadlines or appeal arrangements; habitual emergency practice does not thereby become permanent. Access, applicable rules and competence need separate grounds, promising neither immediate trust nor absence of risk."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "topics": [
      {
        "text": "Living through occupation: fear, dependence and relationships",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "LEAD",
            "quote": "Life under external military authority concerns more than convictions. It may determine access to necessities, movement, institutions and the cost of refusal. Residents of one place do not automatically share the same experience, freedom of choice or response. Occupation also has a legal meaning; this article determines no particular territory's, person's or action's status."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "LEAD",
            "quote": "The concern is fear, dependence and relationships: distinguishing necessities from unconditional agreement, suspicion from established fact, and endurance from dangerous proof demanded of someone. All scenes are hypothetical. Read selectively without replaying threats. Present safety, medical help, assessment of harm and suitable legal procedure remain different tasks. It supplies no methods for evading control, resisting or disclosing sensitive information. Understanding pressure does not erase injured people's voices, while taking responsibility seriously does not permit a whole life to be judged through one visible sign. Neither a heroic nor an accusatory role is assigned in advance."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "I",
            "quote": "An everyday entry is a hypothetical medicine trip under curfew and document checks. Relevant distinctions include current hours, area, date, affected people, exceptions and the restriction notice’s source and currency. Yesterday’s arrangement or retelling establishes no present conditions. Document checks, movement restrictions and treatment access differ. No violation to test a rule, checkpoint evasion or unnecessary disclosure is recommended. Describing an arrangement certifies neither its legality nor a safe available journey."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "II",
            "quote": "Another hypothetical civilian faces an institution demanding information confirmation and an opposing actor demanding all contact stop. Both demands may be impossible to fulfil together. Courage alone does not resolve incompatibility. Obtaining medicine, everyday conversation, delivering help and contributing to harm differ; neither contact nor the word help establishes intention, contribution, free consent or legal outcome. This prescribes neither choosing a side nor transmitting information; actual demands and consequences need suitable competent consideration."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "IX",
            "quote": "After prolonged emergency rule, restoring ordinary procedures is separate from occupation ending. Human Rights Committee General Comment 29, paragraphs 1–2, describes derogations as exceptional and temporary, with restored full Covenant compliance the objective. This norm proves no local implementation. An office reopening confirms no current forms, deadlines or appeal arrangements; habitual emergency practice does not thereby become permanent. Access, applicable rules and competence need separate grounds, promising neither immediate trust nor absence of risk."
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "claims": [
      {
        "text": "Hours, area, date, affected people, exceptions and a current restriction source differ; yesterday’s arrangement establishes no present conditions. Documents, movement and treatment raise different questions; describing an arrangement certifies neither legality nor a safe journey.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "I",
            "quote": "An everyday entry is a hypothetical medicine trip under curfew and document checks. Relevant distinctions include current hours, area, date, affected people, exceptions and the restriction notice’s source and currency. Yesterday’s arrangement or retelling establishes no present conditions. Document checks, movement restrictions and treatment access differ. No violation to test a rule, checkpoint evasion or unnecessary disclosure is recommended. Describing an arrangement certifies neither its legality nor a safe available journey."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "Life under external military authority concerns more than convictions. It may determine access to necessities, movement, institutions and the cost of refusal. Residents of one place do not automatically share the same experience, freedom of choice or response. Occupation also has a legal meaning; this article determines no particular territory's, person's or action's status."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "The concern is fear, dependence and relationships: distinguishing necessities from unconditional agreement, suspicion from established fact, and endurance from dangerous proof demanded of someone. All scenes are hypothetical. Read selectively without replaying threats. Present safety, medical help, assessment of harm and suitable legal procedure remain different tasks. It supplies no methods for evading control, resisting or disclosing sensitive information. Understanding pressure does not erase injured people's voices, while taking responsibility seriously does not permit a whole life to be judged through one visible sign. Neither a heroic nor an accusatory role is assigned in advance."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Obtaining medicine, everyday conversation, delivering help and contributing to harm differ; neither contact nor the word help establishes intention, contribution, free consent or legal outcome.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "II",
            "quote": "Another hypothetical civilian faces an institution demanding information confirmation and an opposing actor demanding all contact stop. Both demands may be impossible to fulfil together. Courage alone does not resolve incompatibility. Obtaining medicine, everyday conversation, delivering help and contributing to harm differ; neither contact nor the word help establishes intention, contribution, free consent or legal outcome. This prescribes neither choosing a side nor transmitting information; actual demands and consequences need suitable competent consideration."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "Life under external military authority concerns more than convictions. It may determine access to necessities, movement, institutions and the cost of refusal. Residents of one place do not automatically share the same experience, freedom of choice or response. Occupation also has a legal meaning; this article determines no particular territory's, person's or action's status."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "The concern is fear, dependence and relationships: distinguishing necessities from unconditional agreement, suspicion from established fact, and endurance from dangerous proof demanded of someone. All scenes are hypothetical. Read selectively without replaying threats. Present safety, medical help, assessment of harm and suitable legal procedure remain different tasks. It supplies no methods for evading control, resisting or disclosing sensitive information. Understanding pressure does not erase injured people's voices, while taking responsibility seriously does not permit a whole life to be judged through one visible sign. Neither a heroic nor an accusatory role is assigned in advance."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Ordinary procedures returning after emergency rule differ from occupation ending; a temporary-derogation norm proves no local implementation, while an open office establishes no current forms, deadlines or appeal arrangements.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "IX",
            "quote": "After prolonged emergency rule, restoring ordinary procedures is separate from occupation ending. Human Rights Committee General Comment 29, paragraphs 1–2, describes derogations as exceptional and temporary, with restored full Covenant compliance the objective. This norm proves no local implementation. An office reopening confirms no current forms, deadlines or appeal arrangements; habitual emergency practice does not thereby become permanent. Access, applicable rules and competence need separate grounds, promising neither immediate trust nor absence of risk."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [
          "S6"
        ],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "Life under external military authority concerns more than convictions. It may determine access to necessities, movement, institutions and the cost of refusal. Residents of one place do not automatically share the same experience, freedom of choice or response. Occupation also has a legal meaning; this article determines no particular territory's, person's or action's status."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "The concern is fear, dependence and relationships: distinguishing necessities from unconditional agreement, suspicion from established fact, and endurance from dangerous proof demanded of someone. All scenes are hypothetical. Read selectively without replaying threats. Present safety, medical help, assessment of harm and suitable legal procedure remain different tasks. It supplies no methods for evading control, resisting or disclosing sensitive information. Understanding pressure does not erase injured people's voices, while taking responsibility seriously does not permit a whole life to be judged through one visible sign. Neither a heroic nor an accusatory role is assigned in advance."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Health, money, documents, responsibilities and information access may differ; wanting to protect loved ones creates no identical possibilities, while material dependence does not automatically approve each action.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "VI",
            "quote": "People in one building may have differed in health, money, documents, family responsibilities and communication access. One cared for someone ill, another needed continuous assistance, another lacked information about options. “Everyone could have done the same” erases these differences. Listing circumstances also does not establish the full meaning of every action in advance. Particular facts can matter without being converted immediately into a complete defence or accusation."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "VI",
            "quote": "Two hypothetical families want to protect loved ones. In one, an adult can leave work; in the other, income supports continuous treatment. General praise for a courageous decision does not explain this difference. Considering material dependence does not approve every action. It avoids replacing actual conditions with possibilities available only to an outside observer. The comparison supplies no conclusion about the actions themselves without the facts they require."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "Life under external military authority concerns more than convictions. It may determine access to necessities, movement, institutions and the cost of refusal. Residents of one place do not automatically share the same experience, freedom of choice or response. Occupation also has a legal meaning; this article determines no particular territory's, person's or action's status."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "The concern is fear, dependence and relationships: distinguishing necessities from unconditional agreement, suspicion from established fact, and endurance from dangerous proof demanded of someone. All scenes are hypothetical. Read selectively without replaying threats. Present safety, medical help, assessment of harm and suitable legal procedure remain different tasks. It supplies no methods for evading control, resisting or disclosing sensitive information. Understanding pressure does not erase injured people's voices, while taking responsibility seriously does not permit a whole life to be judged through one visible sign. Neither a heroic nor an accusatory role is assigned in advance."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "text": "Private discussion, help, legal assessment, reporting and publication have different purposes; consent to one does not itself permit another, while others’ names and experience do not become freely available material.",
        "status": "interpretation",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "VIII",
            "quote": "Private conversation, medical assistance, legal assessment, official reporting and publication have different purposes. Consent to one is no general permission for another. Where conditions allow, purpose, recipients and necessary scope matter. Asking these questions guarantees no safe outcome and replaces no professional assessment under significant consequences or current threat. A listener should not quietly transform one form of contact into another because the story seems important."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "VIII",
            "quote": "Telling one's own story may affect others. Their names, circumstances and experiences do not become freely available material because an account matters. This article requests no dangerous details, indiscriminate forwarding or suspected-offender list. Disclosure in complicated circumstances needs suitable expertise and actual understanding, rather than an outsider's assurance that honest people have nothing to fear. A moral appeal alone cannot certify the consequences of sharing information."
          }
        ],
        "source_ids": [],
        "qualifiers": [
          {
            "text": "Hypothetical scenes establish no reader’s legal outcome.",
            "evidence": [
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "Life under external military authority concerns more than convictions. It may determine access to necessities, movement, institutions and the cost of refusal. Residents of one place do not automatically share the same experience, freedom of choice or response. Occupation also has a legal meaning; this article determines no particular territory's, person's or action's status."
              },
              {
                "block_id": "LEAD",
                "quote": "The concern is fear, dependence and relationships: distinguishing necessities from unconditional agreement, suspicion from established fact, and endurance from dangerous proof demanded of someone. All scenes are hypothetical. Read selectively without replaying threats. Present safety, medical help, assessment of harm and suitable legal procedure remain different tasks. It supplies no methods for evading control, resisting or disclosing sensitive information. Understanding pressure does not erase injured people's voices, while taking responsibility seriously does not permit a whole life to be judged through one visible sign. Neither a heroic nor an accusatory role is assigned in advance."
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "limitations": [
      {
        "text": "This article determines no territory’s, person’s or action’s status, locally safe channels or applicable procedure. A norm proves no actual protection access; confidentiality depends on recipient and rules.",
        "evidence": [
          {
            "block_id": "LEAD",
            "quote": "Life under external military authority concerns more than convictions. It may determine access to necessities, movement, institutions and the cost of refusal. Residents of one place do not automatically share the same experience, freedom of choice or response. Occupation also has a legal meaning; this article determines no particular territory's, person's or action's status."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "I",
            "quote": "ICRC's explanation considers occupation through the actual authority of a foreign army, rather than naming alone, and describes protection obligations. The text dates from 2004; reading it establishes neither every provision's application to a reader nor a current individual legal assessment. A norm's existence does not prove relevant protection is accessible here now. It also does not allow a person to be assigned a legal category through an editorial example. [ICRC on occupation and international humanitarian law](https://www.icrc.org/en/article/occupation-international-humanitarian-law-questions)."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "V",
            "quote": "Imagine hearing, “That person reported everything.” What is directly known? What arrived through someone else's words? What is unknown? These are no instructions for private investigation, testing a suspected person or compiling a dangerous list of names. Actual risk and substantial allegations require suitable expertise and consideration of real circumstances. This article identifies no locally accessible safe channel. It cannot certify the safety of approaching any particular institution or individual."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "VIII",
            "quote": "Someone may want to testify while fearing consequences. Another wants no public discussion but needs help. Neither combination is contradictory. Naming present difficulty should not require complete exposure. This article promises no universal confidentiality: arrangements and exceptions depend on recipient and applicable rules. A sympathetic listener is not automatically an appropriate recipient for every kind of information, particularly where consequences are substantial."
          },
          {
            "block_id": "IX",
            "quote": "Suspicion also establishes no legal responsibility. Public argument, rumour and proper procedure differ. This article determines neither applicable law, sufficient evidence nor a participant's particular rights. Substantial allegations need suitable expertise. “We'll settle it ourselves” may conceal new power and threat; this text supplies no methods for doing so. The absence of an immediate public verdict does not itself settle innocence or guilt either."
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "schema_org": {
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "identifier": "UW:WAR-082:en",
    "headline": "Living through occupation: fear, dependence and relationships",
    "inLanguage": "en",
    "author": [
      {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Andrey Zarinsh"
      },
      {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Maria Evilkut"
      }
    ]
  },
  "production_compatibility": "NOT_RUN",
  "server_auto_acceptance": "NOT_RUN"
}