{
  "schema_version": "uw.editorial_geo.v1",
  "catalog_id": "WAR-076",
  "article_index": "WAR-076",
  "language": "en",
  "headline": "Leaving service because of injury or health",
  "description": "Changed functioning, rehabilitation goals, care and role loss without diminished dignity or assigned local benefits.",
  "short_answer": "Distinguish health questions, service decisions and actually available help. Changed functioning does not determine dignity. Rehabilitation goals need suitable expertise and may concern participation beyond former service. Help with one task does not transfer all decisions. Local status, money and access need separate checking; care requires neither productivity, injury’s benefit nor dangerous proof of former fitness.",
  "master_sha256": "4880fa86f31a37fbd90e2eb573922dfd72f58efed97b2f63b54f7029a0c9f9dc",
  "entities": [
    "war",
    "leaving service",
    "injury",
    "health",
    "rehabilitation",
    "changed functioning",
    "dignity",
    "role loss",
    "status",
    "recognition",
    "accessibility",
    "independence",
    "Dhammapada",
    "Luke",
    "WHO",
    "NIMH"
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "who_rehab",
      "author": "World Health Organization",
      "title": "Rehabilitation (22April2024)",
      "url": "https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rehabilitation",
      "read_scope": "Whole main82–162 read18October2026,date79. Narrow91–94/108 functioning/environment/person goals and preferences. No prescription from examples, statistics, universal outcome, local access or service-clearance guarantee. Specific rights undetermined.",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "dhp129",
      "author": "Dhammapada; translated by Acharya Buddharakkhita",
      "title": "Dandavagga, DhammapadaX129–145; narrow129–130",
      "url": "https://accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/kn/dhp/dhp.10.budd.html",
      "read_scope": "Whole displayed chapter42–64 and metadata26–35/69–72 read18October2026. BPS1985,transcription1996,ATIrevision30Nov2013. Exact7word phrase: Putting oneself in the place of another. Only vulnerability/attention, no illness/injury as punishment137–140, silence134, asceticism141, hierarchy/discipline143–145 or promised suffering elimination144. OriginalPali not read. Conditional permission69–71 read (free distribution,print cap50,derivative attribution/fulllicence); not claimed as a project licence. Only short quotation/attributed RUrendering; specific operation rights undetermined.",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "luke10",
      "author": "Gospel according to Luke; King James Version",
      "title": "Luke10:25–37",
      "url": "https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+10%3A25-37&version=KJV",
      "read_scope": "Whole selected49–70 previously read and reread duringWAR076;KJV/PD76–78. Exact4word Take care of him at10:35. Samaritan/host/care context; neither ancient firstaid prescription, unlimited financial duty nor guaranteed restoration/access. Not wholeGospel/originalGreek. Specific operation/territory rights undetermined despite PDlabel.",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "nimh_help",
      "author": "National Institute of Mental Health",
      "title": "Help for Mental Illnesses (reviewedApril2026)",
      "url": "https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/find-help",
      "read_scope": "Main18–78 previously read in continuous task. Urgency, appropriate expertise, help/list limits. No military clearance rules, prescriptions, local service/confidentiality/cost/status guarantees or UScontacts transferred. Page publicdomain with exceptions; no images used; specific operation undetermined.",
      "rights_status": "UNKNOWN"
    }
  ],
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "c01",
      "text": "A health assessment, a decision to end service, changed responsibilities and received assistance are related but different events. One phrase should not make them simultaneous. A transition under discussion is not completed; an actual decision does not explain every later arrangement. Someone may know a stage and remain uncertain about the next. Naming this is more useful than demanding a complete feeling of departure or unchanged belonging to earlier life. Status has consequences without describing the whole person, their health or future possibilities. Its meaning needs clarification within the actual setting, rather than being inferred from a broad label alone.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. A service decision has a particular subject"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c02",
      "text": "Something may become harder, inaccessible or possible through a different method. This describes present functioning, not reduced dignity. Walking distance, work speed and absent requests cannot measure a person's value. Equally, dignity should not deny actual limits through reassurance that everything remains possible inwardly. Respect includes hearing what changed and which participation fits. Pain need not be displayed to make every need convincing. Yet a conversation about worth establishes no medical opinion or safe conditions by itself. A person's equal value and the particular requirements of an activity can both remain real without one being used to erase the other.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Changed functioning is not a moral demotion"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c03",
      "text": "WHO describes rehabilitation through functioning in an environment and the person's goals. This promises neither former function nor access to a rehabilitation service. A particular plan needs qualified assessment. Today's purpose may concern daily participation rather than return to the earlier activity. Discuss priorities, conditions and unknowns without deriving a prescription, workload or prognosis from an injury category. This article prescribes no test through pain, risk or repeating an old task without appropriate conditions. A practical goal can be considered within its own scope, rather than made to prove fitness for all the responsibilities that once belonged to the person's service role.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [
        "who_rehab"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Rehabilitation can have a purpose beyond former service"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c04",
      "text": "Departure may remove particular danger while taking away a role, routine or shared language. One feeling need not refute another. Gratitude need not replace sadness, nor sadness remove relief. A general article diagnoses neither. Distinguish the loss: tasks, recognition, people, group position or an imagined future. These have different subjects. New employment need not replace a comrade, and healthcare need not immediately settle belonging. Several tasks do not mean the transition is being handled incorrectly. An actual improvement in one condition can matter while another loss remains significant, without requiring a single final emotional account acceptable to everyone nearby.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. Lost roles may matter beside relief"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c05",
      "text": "Transition may affect contacts, treatment location and daily support. Necessity alone confirms no continuation. Clarify who actually receives the next question, what information is needed and what has been agreed. This article guarantees neither access, coverage nor data transfer. Prescribed treatment should not be changed independently because status changes. Clinical continuation needs appropriate expertise; organisation may involve other recipients. Both parts matter so a health need does not disappear behind “the paperwork is finished.” A new life does not become practically arranged merely because an administrative stage has ended, and existing care does not automatically become irrelevant to the person's current circumstances.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "V. Ending service does not automatically end care"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c06",
      "text": "Income, housing, treatment, transport and assistance can become separate transition questions. Reassurance about inner dignity cannot pay for travel or create a service. Yet shortages signify no lesser worth. Distinguish the task, confirmed information and competent recipient. This article assigns no benefit, compensation, disability category or payment entitlement. Conditions require current checking in the actual local setting. Knowing a programme exists establishes neither eligibility nor access for a particular person. A possible route can matter as a question to investigate, while urgent material needs remain actual rather than being dismissed as secondary to the person's attitude or understanding of the transition.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. Money, documents and access need actual answers"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c07",
      "text": "Changed health may call for different household methods and responsibilities. Neither total incapacity nor unchanged demands should be assumed in equality's name. Discuss an action, conditions and support while preserving choice where real. Independence need not mean absent help in every detail; help need not transfer every decision to a relative. Participation can have different limits by task. Someone may want travel assistance and independently decide whom to see. These should not become one status of total dependence or rejected care. A practical arrangement can recognise a particular need without making that need the governing definition of every relationship and choice in the person's life.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. Help at home does not remove independence everywhere"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c08",
      "text": "Departure erases no shared history with those remaining. Roles and available contact may still change. Neither identical relationships nor easy understanding can be promised. Wanting connection, feeling awkward or missing participation creates no duty to prove loyalty through inaccessible demands or danger. Actual service rules, safety and health remain relevant. A personal bond is no medical clearance; an official transition does not establish which relationships must end or continue regardless of consent. The present form can be considered separately from the history's importance, without requiring either total severance or an unchanged role that current conditions do not support.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. Comradeship requires no dangerous proof"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c09",
      "text": "Employment, study, household life or another activity may raise new questions. They need not all be solved through an immediate calling. Some experience may transfer; other tasks require learning, conditions or assistance. No skill is promised easy translation everywhere, yet absent instant recognition erases no whole experience. Ask what is worth exploring, which limits matter and who can assess conditions. Human value does not depend on quickly becoming useful again or supplying observers with a successful transition story. A possible activity can be considered as a particular choice without being assigned to restore status, provide every needed resource and settle the person's whole future at once.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IX. New participation need not immediately replace a former role"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c10",
      "text": "Lost roles, pain, uncertainty and others' responses can be discussed without becoming one automatic diagnosis. Where difficulties substantially interfere with life, seek appropriate qualified help with a present description. NIMH offers general orientation, not conclusions about everyone leaving service. All causes need not be known, nor must bodily and emotional needs compete. Different recipients may be appropriate. One good day establishes no absent difficulty; one hard conversation makes no future hopeless. Assessment concerns actual life beyond a transition's label. Its subject can remain specific without requiring the person to explain every part of their history or settle all questions of meaning beforehand.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [
        "nimh_help"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "X. Distress can be discussed without diagnosis from transition"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c11",
      "text": "Injury or illness need not become a good thing before life continues. Limits can be recognised, care appreciated and available participation sought without wanting what happened. No later result must prove the loss necessary. Inspiring observers and daily gratitude for survival are not owed. A current task has its subject; dignity extends beyond health and status. This promises no disappearance of pain through understanding. It allows care without first convincingly loving events or discovering an acceptable higher cause. A person can value a particular relationship or action while still rejecting the harm that changed their circumstances, with neither part required to erase the other.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "XI. Continuing life need not justify injury"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "c12",
      "text": "Begin with safety and current health needs. Threats to life, violence or danger of harm to yourself or another require suitable urgent local help. Do not prove former fitness through pain, risk or unapproved exertion. Status changes justify no independent prescription changes.",
      "type": "editorial_synthesis",
      "attribution": "United Wisdom editorial reasoning with hypothetical scenes and limited historical/specialist sources; neither medical, legal nor service assessment.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "What this means in practice"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "q": "Does one document complete the whole transition?",
      "a": "No. Assessment, decision, changed duties and delivered assistance have different actual results.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "I. A service decision has a particular subject"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Does changed functioning reduce dignity?",
      "a": "No. Conditions for an action may change without moral demotion. Attention to vulnerability does not mean deciding for someone.",
      "source_ids": [
        "dhp129"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "II. Changed functioning is not a moral demotion"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Must rehabilitation restore former service?",
      "a": "That is not the only possible goal. Present participation, goals and conditions need appropriate expertise without guaranteed outcomes.",
      "source_ids": [
        "who_rehab"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "III. Rehabilitation can have a purpose beyond former service"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Can relief and role loss coexist?",
      "a": "Yes. No single correct feeling is required; new tasks need not replace every former connection.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "IV. Lost roles may matter beside relief"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Does ending service guarantee continuing care?",
      "a": "A general article guarantees no such result. Contact, format and actual assistance need clarification.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "V. Ending service does not automatically end care"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Does the article assign benefits or payments?",
      "a": "No. A programme, eligibility, application and received service differ. Current local checking is needed.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VI. Money, documents and access need actual answers"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Does help transfer all independence?",
      "a": "No. Support with one action differs from other decisions. Helpers retain limits; children bear no adult-safety responsibility.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VII. Help at home does not remove independence everywhere"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Must loyalty to comrades be proved through danger?",
      "a": "No. Shared history is no current medical clearance; contact and personal information need consent.",
      "source_ids": [],
      "article_sections": [
        "VIII. Comradeship requires no dangerous proof"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "How can substantial distress be brought for help?",
      "a": "Begin with a present description to suitable qualified expertise. Threats to life need urgent actual local assistance.",
      "source_ids": [
        "nimh_help"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "X. Distress can be discussed without diagnosis from transition"
      ]
    },
    {
      "q": "Must an injury’s benefit be found before life continues?",
      "a": "No. Care requires neither loss justified nor immediate usefulness; a parable replaces no actual resources.",
      "source_ids": [
        "luke10"
      ],
      "article_sections": [
        "XI. Continuing life need not justify injury"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "retrieval_limits": [
    "Neither diagnosis, clinical plan/workload, clearance, discharge process nor deadline.",
    "Assigns no disability category, benefit, compensation, income or local-access guarantee.",
    "Requires neither former function, full independence, growth/gratitude nor new productivity.",
    "Explains neither injury nor illness as punishment, spiritual gift or victim fault.",
    "Prescribes neither dangerous fitness proof, independent treatment changes nor ancient medical protocol.",
    "Consent to help transfers no whole life; children are no permanent caregivers/sole safety supports.",
    "Legal/social rules, data, confidentiality and actual access need separate checking."
  ]
}