# When avoiding all contact is impossible

A shared corridor, job or queue may require interaction with someone associated with the other side of a war. Proximity alone establishes neither trust nor reconciliation or agreement to discuss experience. A practical task can retain a narrow subject while memory and public conflict remain unresolved.

The full article distinguishes work agreements, closeness, public roles and present safety. Agreeing a time or receiving a needed service does not abandon convictions. Dignity makes no acts identical and requires no trust test through personal risk. Origin replaces no particular conduct information; actual threats do not vanish for coexistence.

Advice simply to avoid meeting creates no alternative housing, income or care. An intermediary, writing and the word voluntary verify no safety automatically. Availability, roles, conditions and consequences need actual understanding. This supplies no individual risk assessment, legal route or prescribed joint discussion. Private history should not become payment for an ordinary task or material for a convenient public ending.

Substantial everyday difficulties may warrant suitable help before exemplary relations with all. Immediate danger, serious deterioration or inability to maintain safety requires appropriate available local urgent help. Do not wait for another meeting or shared handshake.

[Read the full article](ARTICLE_EN.md).