Article guide
Using this collection: choosing a subject and an amount of reading
Begin with a present question and choose an entry, one section, or a full text. Subjects do not classify people; recognition establishes no diagnosis. Plans, available articles, and assistance received differ. Pausing, changing subjects, and approaching care without preliminary reading remain possible.
Questions explored
Must I name a diagnosis first?
No. Navigation starts with a question; recognising yourself is not professional assessment.
Must everything be read in order?
No. Choose an entry, a section, or a full text; pause and change direction.
Can an article be assigned to someone close?
Offer choice without diagnosing or requiring a report. A link does not replace an agreed task.
Does every planned title mean an available article?
No. Plans, available text, and assistance received differ; check individual readiness and accessibility.
Key distinctions
Recognising a description does not replace professional PTSD assessment. (NIMH professional diagnostic scope)
- Reading is no medical questionnaire, test, or diagnosis of the reader or someone else.
Emergency assistance involves actual resources and services; a general text cannot certify their accessibility. (WHO emergency assistance context)
- No local pathway, current emergency directive, or individual urgency assessment.
Subject areas follow a present question, may overlap, and do not classify readers by condition. (United Wisdom editorial navigation proposal)
- No implemented automatic selection, registered clinical pathway, or compulsory group identity.
Entry, section, and full text are optional amounts, allowing pauses, skipping, and changed subjects. (United Wisdom optional reading arrangement)
- No time quota, guaranteed result, self-testing, or self-directed exposure.
Language, intended readership, and another person’s agreement matter separately; a link is not assistance and a plan is not publication. (United Wisdom editorial and ethical distinctions)
- No interface features, unready-article availability, universal procedures, or child suitability promised from a heading.
Clinical information, fiction, authorial proposals, and philosophical images have different statuses. (United Wisdom explicit source-role distinction)
- No duty to check everything or automatic institutional endorsement of an entire article.
Laozi on a step and Epictetus on an undertaking are compared only for choosing a manageable amount. (Checked primary passages and explicit authorial bridge)
- No shared therapy, compulsory long journey, complete foresight, or grading of worth.
Limits of interpretation
- No diagnosis, trauma questionnaire or compulsory reading route.
- No promise of implemented search, accounts, saving or automatic selection.
- Planned titles do not prove availability or publication.
- A text or sent link does not establish assistance received.
- No required disclosure, faith, growth, emotion or self-directed exposure.
- Actual local safety and medical access require appropriate current information.
- Russian and English are available meaning choices, not country procedure.
Sources
- Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder — National Institute of Mental Health
Full relevant written sections: definition, reactions, assessment, ongoing trauma and Reprints; web lines 21–154
Source use: TEXT_REUSE_ALLOWED_WITH_ATTRIBUTION
No individual diagnosis, symptom scale, local pathway or treatment plan
- Mental health in emergencies — World Health Organization
Complete main fact sheet, web lines 81–151, including problems, actions and references; listed underlying studies not independently read
Source use: UNKNOWN
Public-health and service context, not individual prognosis; prevalence numbers, country claims and clinical protocols not imported
- Tao Teh King, chapter 64 — Laozi (traditional attribution); translator James Legge
Complete chapter 64 and opening edition/reuse terms already read for WAR-002; chapter 64 checked again for selected quotation, web lines 519–522
Source use: UNKNOWN
No compulsory full journey, recovery programme or clinical guarantee
- Enchiridion, section 29 — Epictetus; displayed translator Elizabeth Carter
Complete section 29 and title/translator already read for WAR-003, web lines 18–22 and 76–83
Source use: UNKNOWN
No clinical intervention, self-blame, mandatory discipline or complete control of consequences