Authorship and data: taking part in research does not authorise everything

Does supervision or funding establish all authorship?

Does CRediT decide authorship and first position?

May data be taken away to defend a contribution?

What counts as an enquiry result?

A particular contribution and its relation to a result need description; rank, labour volume and an initial general idea do not establish all authorship. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

A name involves credit and responsibility; ICMJE is a scoped editorial framework, while actual opportunity to examine the final version needs checking. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

CRediT describes contributions without awarding authorship, position or data; a table, discussion and confirmed agreement differ. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

Project access authorises no new transfer or disclosure; data, code, text and method may have different conditions, and removing names guarantees no permissible disclosure. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

Funding, credit and economic rights differ; WIPO national exceptions decide no actual manuscript, data or code rights. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

A scientific doubt needs substantive grounds separately from a status decision; chronology establishes no retaliation motive and an authorship claim makes no analysis infallible. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

An omitted name, role, citation, order and material use are different possible subjects; recipient and procedure require actual clarification. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

Contribution evidence must fit access rights and purpose; both parties’ dignity coexists with checking, and support has limits of competence and result. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

Version correction, submission, published correction, access, place and feelings differ; departure cancels no usage question and creates no earnings. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.

Laozi and Confucius support limited questions about understanding and appropriation, not rights verdicts, editorial policy or surrender of credit. (Author distinctions through fictional academic case; sources only in explicitly scoped examples)

• Maksim, group and events are fictional; no actual appropriation, breach, guilt, diagnosis or dispute verdict is established.
• Discipline, journal, institution, country, status and agreement need checking. ICMJE is not universal law, CRediT awards no authorship and WIPO decides no actual data rights.
• Enquiry, publication, information gathering and departure guarantee neither safety nor correction, a place, access, funding or earnings; threats need separate protection and help.
• Preparation, delivery, reply, working correction and published correction are not restored access, place, trust, earnings or emotional release.
• No authority is offered for restricted-data transfer/disclosure, whole-project copying, concealed archives, deletion/withholding the only copy, altered history or unsupported use of others’ work.
• Historical images replace neither research facts nor authorship criteria or property rights, and require no junior to surrender legitimate credit; understanding proves no dissenter infallible.