A child among grades, punishments and adult decisions

Does respect require cancelling a low grade?

Must the whole decision be transferred to children for them to be heard?

Can a child be promised absolute secrecy?

What counts as a result of help or reporting?

Assessment of a piece of work does not establish the child's entire worth; criteria and their application differ. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

A disciplinary measure differs from a grade and needs consideration of grounds, content, limits and an end or available review. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

Hearing children does not mean fulfilling every wish or transferring every decision; age and capacities matter to participation. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

Error or disobedience does not cancel protection; adults retain duties, and children should not stop danger or secure an exit on their own. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

Adult disagreement does not make a child their responsible mediator; discussion should not delay necessary urgent protection. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

An assessment should lead to a definite learning question; help and alternatives require available conditions and resources, not a promised result. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

Learning questions and danger reports may need different recipients; confidentiality and permissible information exchange require checking. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

Supporting a child does not establish every fact; fairness, privacy and protection of other children remain relevant. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

Preparation, receipt, decision and changed conditions differ; partial outcomes and transfers need examination of their actual scope. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.

Dewey and the selected Confucian saying offer questions about development and participation without replacing current law, science or protection. (Original bounded author reasoning; selected source examples only in stated scope)

• All particular cases are invented; country and school rules are unspecified. The Convention concerns State-party obligations, not established local law, applicability or implementation.
• Safe reporting, complaint, transfer or disclosure, a changed mark and retained place are not guaranteed. Protection and adult duties are not replaced by reflection or transferred to children.
• No absolute secrecy or general permission for recording/restricted information is offered. Children are not assigned dossiers, provocation or public disclosure, and other children's privacy matters.
• The article determines no diagnosis or method effectiveness. Suitable help does not guarantee a result, and feelings after a decision alone establish neither diagnosis nor new danger.
• Promises, available resources, transfers and actual change differ. Adults check conditions; remaining temporarily does not establish agreement to every form of treatment.
• Historical philosophy is not current clinical science, a proven method or legal protection. Hierarchies and physical force are not adopted, and dignity does not replace protection or education.